Suppr超能文献

不同体重在伴有和不伴有增强肾清除率的危重症患者 Cockcroft-Gault 方程中的表现:一项多中心队列研究。

Performance of different body weights in the Cockcroft-Gault equation in critically ill patients with and without augmented renal clearance: A multicenter cohort.

机构信息

Trauma Surgical Critical Care, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, Ohio, USA.

Critical Care, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2023 Nov;43(11):1131-1138. doi: 10.1002/phar.2743. Epub 2022 Nov 24.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to evaluate the performance of the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation with different body weights (BWs) compared to a measured creatinine clearance (mCrCl) in an intensive care unit (ICU) population with and without augmented renal clearance (ARC).

DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Two ICUs in the United States and four ICUs from a previous international observational analysis.

PATIENTS

Adult ICU patients admitted from January 1, 2010 to July 30, 2020 with at least one mCrCl collected within the initial 10 days of hospitalization were eligible for inclusion.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was the performance of the CG equation in ARC (mCrCl≥130 ml/min/1.73 m ) and non-ARC (mCrCl<130 ml/min/1.73 m ) patients. Correlation was analyzed by Pearson's correlation coefficient, bias by mean difference, and accuracy by the percentage of patients within 30% of the mCrCl. A total of 383 patients were included, which provided 1708 mCrCl values. The majority were male (n = 239, 62%), median age of 55 years [IQR 40-65] with a surgical diagnosis (n = 239, 77%). ARC was identified in 229 (60%) patients. The ARC group had lower Scr values (0.6 [0.5-0.7] vs. 0.7 [0.6-0.9] mg/dl, p < 0.001) and higher mCrCl (172.8 (SD 39.1) vs. 89.9 mL/min/1.73 m (SD 25.4), p < 0.001) compared with the non-ARC group, respectively. Among non-ARC patients there was a moderate correlation (r = 0.33-0.39), moderate accuracy (range 48-58%), and low bias (range of -12.9 to 17.1) among the different BW estimations with the adjusted BW having the better performance. Among ARC patients there was low correlation (r = 0.24-0.28), low to moderate accuracy (range 38-70%), and high bias (range of -58.5 to -21.6).

CONCLUSIONS

The CG-adjusted BW had the best performance in the non-ARC patients, while CG performed poorly with any BW in ARC patients. Although the CG equation remains the standard equation for estimating CrCl in the ICU setting, a new, validated equation is needed for patients with ARC.

摘要

研究目的

主要目的是评估 Cockcroft-Gault(CG)方程在合并和不合并增强肾清除率(ARC)的重症监护病房(ICU)人群中,使用不同体重(BW)与实测肌酐清除率(mCrCl)相比的表现。

设计

多中心、回顾性队列研究。

地点

美国的 2 个 ICU 和之前国际观察性分析的 4 个 ICU。

患者

2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 7 月 30 日期间入院的 ICU 成年患者,入院最初 10 天内至少采集了一次 mCrCl,符合纳入标准。

测量和主要结果

主要结局是 CG 方程在 ARC(mCrCl≥130ml/min/1.73m )和非 ARC(mCrCl<130ml/min/1.73m )患者中的表现。通过 Pearson 相关系数分析相关性,通过均数差分析偏差,通过 mCrCl 的 30%范围内的患者比例分析准确性。共纳入 383 例患者,共提供了 1708 次 mCrCl 值。大多数患者为男性(n=239,62%),中位年龄 55 岁[四分位距 40-65],手术诊断(n=239,77%)。229 例(60%)患者存在 ARC。ARC 组的 Scr 值较低(0.6[0.5-0.7] vs. 0.7[0.6-0.9]mg/dl,p<0.001),mCrCl 较高(172.8[标准差 39.1] vs. 89.9ml/min/1.73m(标准差 25.4),p<0.001)。与非 ARC 组相比,ARC 组的 Scr 值较低(0.6[0.5-0.7] vs. 0.7[0.6-0.9]mg/dl,p<0.001),mCrCl 较高(172.8[标准差 39.1] vs. 89.9ml/min/1.73m(标准差 25.4),p<0.001)。在非 ARC 患者中,不同 BW 估计值之间存在中度相关性(r=0.33-0.39)、中度准确性(范围 48%-58%)和低偏差(范围-12.9 至 17.1),其中调整 BW 的 CG 表现最佳。在 ARC 患者中,相关性较低(r=0.24-0.28),准确性较低至中度(范围 38%-70%),偏差较高(范围-58.5 至-21.6)。

结论

CG 调整 BW 在非 ARC 患者中表现最佳,而 CG 方程在 ARC 患者中使用任何 BW 表现均不佳。尽管 Cockcroft-Gault 方程仍然是 ICU 中估计 CrCl 的标准方程,但对于 ARC 患者,需要一种新的、经过验证的方程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5855/10947228/fedb514948a9/PHAR-43-1131-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验