Reid J Leighton, Mendenhall Chase D, Rosales J Abel, Zahawi Rakan A, Holl Karen D
Department of Environmental Studies, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
Center for Conservation Biology, Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 4;9(3):e90573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090573. eCollection 2014.
Birds both promote and prosper from forest restoration. The ecosystem functions birds perform can increase the pace of forest regeneration and, correspondingly, increase the available habitat for birds and other forest-dependent species. The aim of this study was to learn how tropical forest restoration treatments interact with landscape tree cover to affect the structure and composition of a diverse bird assemblage. We sampled bird communities over two years in 13 restoration sites and two old-growth forests in southern Costa Rica. Restoration sites were established on degraded farmlands in a variety of landscape contexts, and each included a 0.25-ha plantation, island treatment (trees planted in patches), and unplanted control. We analyzed four attributes of bird communities including frugivore abundance, nectarivore abundance, migrant insectivore richness, and compositional similarity of bird communities in restoration plots to bird communities in old-growth forests. All four bird community variables were greater in plantations and/or islands than in control treatments. Frugivore and nectarivore abundance decreased with increasing tree cover in the landscape surrounding restoration plots, whereas compositional similarity to old-growth forests was greatest in plantations embedded in landscapes with high tree cover. Migrant insectivore richness was unaffected by landscape tree cover. Our results agree with previous studies showing that increasing levels of investment in active restoration are positively related to bird richness and abundance, but differences in the effects of landscape tree cover on foraging guilds and community composition suggest that trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and bird-mediated ecosystem functioning may be important for prioritizing restoration sites.
鸟类既促进森林恢复,又能从中受益。鸟类所发挥的生态系统功能可以加快森林再生的速度,相应地,也能增加鸟类及其他依赖森林的物种的可用栖息地。本研究的目的是了解热带森林恢复措施如何与景观树木覆盖相互作用,从而影响多样化鸟类群落的结构和组成。我们在哥斯达黎加南部的13个恢复地点和两片原始森林中对鸟类群落进行了为期两年的采样。恢复地点是在各种景观环境下的退化农田上建立的,每个地点都包括一个0.25公顷的种植园、岛屿处理(斑块状种植树木)和未种植的对照区。我们分析了鸟类群落的四个属性,包括食果动物的数量、食蜜动物的数量、迁徙食虫动物的丰富度,以及恢复地块中鸟类群落与原始森林中鸟类群落的组成相似性。所有这四个鸟类群落变量在种植园和/或岛屿中都比在对照处理中更大。食果动物和食蜜动物的数量随着恢复地块周围景观中树木覆盖的增加而减少,而与原始森林的组成相似性在树木覆盖高的景观中的种植园中最大。迁徙食虫动物的丰富度不受景观树木覆盖的影响。我们的结果与之前的研究一致,表明对积极恢复的投资增加与鸟类丰富度和数量呈正相关,但景观树木覆盖对觅食类群和群落组成的影响差异表明,生物多样性保护与鸟类介导的生态系统功能之间的权衡可能对确定恢复地点的优先级很重要。