• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

功能多样性对森林生物多样性实验中生产力随年龄增长的影响。

Functional diversity effects on productivity increase with age in a forest biodiversity experiment.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Department of Geography, Remote Sensing Laboratories, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Dec;5(12):1594-1603. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01564-3. Epub 2021 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1038/s41559-021-01564-3
PMID:34737435
Abstract

Forest restoration increases global forest area and ecosystem services such as primary productivity and carbon storage. How tree species functional composition impacts the provisioning of these services as forests develop is sparsely studied. We used 10-year data from 478 plots with 191,200 trees in a forest biodiversity experiment in subtropical China to assess the relationship between community productivity and community-weighted mean (CWM) or functional diversity (FD) values of 38 functional traits. We found that effects of FD values on productivity became larger than effects of CWM values after 7 years of forest development and that the FD values also became more reliable predictors of productivity than the CWM values. In contrast to CWM, FD values consistently increased productivity across ten different species-pool subsets. Our results imply that to promote productivity in the long term it is imperative for forest restoration projects to plant multispecies communities with large functional diversity.

摘要

森林恢复增加了全球森林面积和生态系统服务,如初级生产力和碳储存。树木物种功能组成如何影响森林发展过程中这些服务的提供,这方面的研究还很少。我们利用中国亚热带地区一个森林生物多样性实验中的 478 个样地、191200 棵树的 10 年数据,评估了 38 个功能性状的群落生产力与群落加权均值(CWM)或功能多样性(FD)值之间的关系。我们发现,FD 值对生产力的影响在森林发展 7 年后大于 CWM 值的影响,而且 FD 值比 CWM 值更能可靠地预测生产力。与 CWM 不同的是,FD 值在十个不同的物种库子集中都能持续提高生产力。我们的研究结果表明,为了长期促进生产力,森林恢复项目必须种植具有较大功能多样性的多物种群落。

相似文献

1
Functional diversity effects on productivity increase with age in a forest biodiversity experiment.功能多样性对森林生物多样性实验中生产力随年龄增长的影响。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Dec;5(12):1594-1603. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01564-3. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
2
Tree species and genetic diversity increase productivity via functional diversity and trophic feedbacks.树种和遗传多样性通过功能多样性和营养反馈增加生产力。
Elife. 2022 Nov 29;11:e78703. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78703.
3
Using plant functional traits to explain diversity-productivity relationships.利用植物功能性状解释多样性-生产力关系。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036760. Epub 2012 May 18.
4
Origin context of trait data matters for predictions of community performance in a grassland biodiversity experiment.性状数据的起源背景对草原生物多样性实验中群落表现的预测很重要。
Ecology. 2018 May;99(5):1214-1226. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2216. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
5
Forest disturbance increases functional diversity but decreases phylogenetic diversity of an arboreal tropical ant community.森林干扰会增加树栖热带蚂蚁群落的功能多样性,但会降低其系统发育多样性。
J Anim Ecol. 2024 Apr;93(4):501-516. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.14060. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
6
Biodiversity promotes tree growth during succession in subtropical forest.生物多样性促进亚热带森林演替过程中的树木生长。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 26;8(11):e81246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081246. eCollection 2013.
7
Effects of thinning on the demography and functional community structure of a secondary tropical lowland rain forest.抚育间伐对次生热带低地雨林种群动态和功能群落结构的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 1;279:111805. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111805. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
8
Genetic richness affects trait variation but not community productivity in a tree diversity experiment.在一项树木多样性实验中,遗传丰富度影响性状变异,但不影响群落生产力。
New Phytol. 2020 Aug;227(3):744-756. doi: 10.1111/nph.16567. Epub 2020 May 3.
9
Tree and shrub richness modifies subtropical tree productivity by regulating the diversity and community composition of soil bacteria and archaea.树木和灌木的丰富度通过调节土壤细菌和古菌的多样性和群落组成来改变亚热带树木的生产力。
Microbiome. 2023 Nov 23;11(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01676-x.
10
Tree diversity promotes generalist herbivore community patterns in a young subtropical forest experiment.在一项亚热带幼林实验中,树木多样性促进了多食性食草动物群落格局。
Oecologia. 2017 Feb;183(2):455-467. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3769-0. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The tree growth-herbivory relationship depends on functional traits across forest biodiversity experiments.树木生长与食草动物的关系取决于森林生物多样性实验中的功能性状。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1038/s41559-025-02835-z.
2
Understory shrub diversity: equally vital as overstory tree diversity to promote forest productivity.林下灌木多样性:对于促进森林生产力而言,与上层树木多样性同等重要。
Natl Sci Rev. 2025 Mar 13;12(7):nwaf093. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaf093. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Dominant species predict plant richness and biomass in global grasslands.

本文引用的文献

1
Improve forest restoration initiatives to meet Sustainable Development Goal 15.改进森林恢复举措,以实现可持续发展目标15。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Jan;5(1):10-13. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-01332-9.
2
Plant traits alone are poor predictors of ecosystem properties and long-term ecosystem functioning.仅植物特性是对生态系统属性和长期生态系统功能的不良预测指标。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Dec;4(12):1602-1611. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-01316-9. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
3
Tree planting is not a simple solution.植树并非一个简单的解决方案。
优势物种可预测全球草原的植物丰富度和生物量。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1038/s41559-025-02701-y.
4
Biodiversity and Management as Central Players in the Network of Relationships Underlying Forest Resilience.生物多样性与管理作为森林恢复力所依赖的关系网络中的核心要素。
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 May;31(5):e70196. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70196.
5
Cones and consequences: the false dichotomy of conifers vs broad-leaves has critical implications for research and modelling.球果与影响:针叶树与阔叶树的错误二分法对研究和建模具有关键意义。
New Phytol. 2025 Jul;247(1):33-39. doi: 10.1111/nph.70136. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
6
Tree Diversity Increases Forest Temperature Buffering via Enhancing Canopy Density and Structural Diversity.树木多样性通过增强树冠密度和结构多样性来提高森林的温度缓冲能力。
Ecol Lett. 2025 Mar;28(3):e70096. doi: 10.1111/ele.70096.
7
Unprotected carbon dominates decadal soil carbon increase.未受保护的碳主导了土壤碳十年期的增加。
Nat Commun. 2025 Feb 27;16(1):2008. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57354-z.
8
Multidimensionality of tree communities structure host-parasitoid networks and their phylogenetic composition.树木群落结构的多维性承载着寄主-寄生蜂网络及其系统发育组成。
Elife. 2025 Feb 25;13:RP100202. doi: 10.7554/eLife.100202.
9
Growth Rate and Not Growing Season Explains the Increased Productivity of Masson Pine in Mixed Stands.生长速率而非生长季节解释了马尾松混交林生产力的提高。
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jan 21;14(3):313. doi: 10.3390/plants14030313.
10
Asymmetric sensitivity of boreal forest resilience to forest gain and loss.北方森林恢复力对森林增加和减少的不对称敏感性。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Mar;9(3):505-514. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02631-1. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491):580-581. doi: 10.1126/science.aba8232.
4
Directed species loss reduces community productivity in a subtropical forest biodiversity experiment.定向物种丧失降低了亚热带森林生物多样性实验中的群落生产力。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Apr;4(4):550-559. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1127-4. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
5
A multitrophic perspective on biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research.生物多样性与生态系统功能研究的多营养级视角
Adv Ecol Res. 2019;61:1-54. doi: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
6
How do trees respond to species mixing in experimental compared to observational studies?与观察性研究相比,树木在实验性研究中如何对物种混合做出反应?
Ecol Evol. 2019 Sep 10;9(19):11254-11265. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5627. eCollection 2019 Oct.
7
Neighbour species richness and local structural variability modulate aboveground allocation patterns and crown morphology of individual trees.邻域物种丰富度和局部结构变异性调节了个体树木的地上分配格局和树冠形态。
Ecol Lett. 2019 Dec;22(12):2130-2140. doi: 10.1111/ele.13400. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
8
Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon.恢复天然森林是去除大气中碳的最佳方式。
Nature. 2019 Apr;568(7750):25-28. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01026-8.
9
The Future of Complementarity: Disentangling Causes from Consequences.互补性的未来:厘清因果关系。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 Feb;34(2):167-180. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
10
Global trait-environment relationships of plant communities.全球植物群落的特质-环境关系。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Dec;2(12):1906-1917. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0699-8. Epub 2018 Nov 19.