Institute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Floridagrid.15276.37, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Floridagrid.15276.37, Orlando, Florida, USA.
mBio. 2022 Dec 20;13(6):e0291622. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02916-22. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has radically altered daily life. Effective antiviral therapies to combat COVID-19, especially severe disease, remain scarce. Molnupiravir is an antiviral that has shown clinical efficacy against mild-to-moderate COVID-19 but failed to provide benefit to hospitalized patients with severe disease. Here, we explained the mechanism behind the failure of molnupiravir in hospitalized patients and identified alternative dosing strategies that would improve therapeutic outcomes in all patients with COVID-19. We showed that delaying therapy initiation markedly decreased the antiviral effect of molnupiravir, and these results were directly related to intracellular drug triphosphate pools and intracellular viral burden at the start of therapy. The adverse influence of therapeutic delay could be overcome by increasing drug exposure, which increased intracellular molnupiravir triphosphate concentrations that inhibited viral replication. These findings illustrated that molnupiravir must be administered as early as possible following COVID-19 symptom onset to maximize therapeutic efficacy. Higher doses may be effective in patients hospitalized with severe disease, but the safety of high-dose molnupiravir regimens is unknown. Our findings could be extended to design effective regimens with nucleoside analogs for other RNA viruses, especially those with pandemic potential. In this study, we showed that early intervention with molnupiravir resulted in a greater antiviral effect, and we explained the mechanism behind this phenomenon. Our results predicted and explained the failure of molnupiravir in hospitalized patients and highlighted the utility of preclinical pharmacodynamic studies to design optimal antiviral regimens for the treatment of viral diseases. This contrasts with the procedure that was implemented early in the pandemic in which clinical studies were conducted in the absence of preclinical experimentation. These findings are significant and demonstrated the importance of experimental approaches in antiviral development for treatments against COVID-19 as well as other viral diseases.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)是导致 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的病原体,它彻底改变了人们的日常生活。目前,针对 COVID-19,特别是重症疾病,有效的抗病毒疗法仍然匮乏。莫努匹韦是一种抗病毒药物,已被证明对轻度至中度 COVID-19 具有临床疗效,但对住院的重症患者无效。在这里,我们解释了莫努匹韦在住院患者中失败的原因,并确定了替代给药策略,可以改善所有 COVID-19 患者的治疗效果。我们表明,延迟治疗开始会显著降低莫努匹韦的抗病毒效果,而这些结果与治疗开始时细胞内药物三磷酸池和细胞内病毒载量直接相关。通过增加药物暴露,可以克服治疗延迟的不利影响,从而增加抑制病毒复制的细胞内莫努匹韦三磷酸浓度。这些发现表明,莫努匹韦必须在 COVID-19 症状出现后尽早给药,以最大限度地提高治疗效果。对于住院的重症患者,较高剂量可能有效,但高剂量莫努匹韦方案的安全性尚不清楚。我们的发现可扩展至设计针对其他 RNA 病毒的有效核苷类似物方案,特别是那些具有大流行潜力的病毒。在这项研究中,我们表明,早期干预使用莫努匹韦可产生更大的抗病毒效果,并解释了这种现象的机制。我们的结果预测并解释了莫努匹韦在住院患者中的失败,并强调了临床前药效学研究在设计治疗病毒性疾病的最佳抗病毒方案方面的作用。这与大流行早期实施的程序形成对比,当时在没有临床前实验的情况下进行了临床研究。这些发现意义重大,证明了实验方法在 COVID-19 及其他病毒性疾病的抗病毒药物研发中的重要性。