Suppr超能文献

化疗联合帕尼单抗/西妥昔单抗与化疗联合贝伐单抗治疗野生型KRAS/RAS转移性结直肠癌的荟萃分析

Chemotherapy plus panitumumab/cetuximab versus chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in wild-type KRAS/RAS metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Chengren, Liu Lili, Lv Yaochun, Li Jingjing, Cao Cong, Lu Jiyong, Wang Shuai, Du Binbin, Yang Xiongfei

机构信息

General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University.

Department of Anorectal Surgery, Gansu Provincial People's Hospital.

出版信息

Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2022 Dec;22(12):1333-1347. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2147512. Epub 2022 Nov 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

It remains controversial which targeted monoclonal antibodies combined with chemotherapy can provide better efficacy in wild-type KRAS/RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Therefore, we used this meta-analysis to assess the latest evidence of clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase databases for eligible studies published from database inception to May 2022. RevMan 5.4 was used to conduct the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

11 RCTs involving a total of 3575 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that EGFR inhibitors significantly prolonged the overall survival (OS) [HR = 0.83, 95%CI (0.73, 0.94), = 0.003] and overall response rate (ORR) [RR = 1.11, 95%CI (1.05, 1.18), = 0.0003] compared to VEGF inhibitors in wild-type KRAS/RAS mCRC patients, but no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) [HR = 0.96, 95%CI (0.87, 1.07), = 0.50]. In subgroup analysis, the survival benefit of EGFR inhibitors was limited to first-line treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that EGFR inhibitors were superior to VEGF inhibitors in wild-type KRAS/RAS mCRC patients, especially in patients with first-line treatment. However, subsequent large sample, multi-center RCTs are needed to further verify our conclusions.

摘要

目的

在野生型KRAS/RAS转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中,哪种靶向单克隆抗体联合化疗能提供更好的疗效仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析以评估临床结局的最新证据。

材料与方法

我们系统检索了PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆和Embase数据库,以获取从数据库建立至2022年5月发表的符合条件的研究。使用RevMan 5.4进行荟萃分析。

结果

纳入了11项随机对照试验,共3575例患者。荟萃分析显示,在野生型KRAS/RAS mCRC患者中,与血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂相比,表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抑制剂显著延长了总生存期(OS)[风险比(HR)=0.83,95%置信区间(CI)(0.73,0.94),P=0.003]和总缓解率(ORR)[相对危险度(RR)=1.11,95%CI(1.05,1.18),P=0.0003],但无进展生存期(PFS)差异无统计学意义[HR = 0.96,95%CI(0.87,1.07),P = 0.50]。亚组分析中,EGFR抑制剂的生存获益仅限于一线治疗。

结论

我们的研究表明,在野生型KRAS/RAS mCRC患者中,EGFR抑制剂优于VEGF抑制剂,尤其是在一线治疗的患者中。然而,后续需要大样本、多中心随机对照试验来进一步验证我们的结论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验