• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据急诊室格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德风险评分-计算机断层扫描评分提示的风险,急性上消化道出血的临床结局。

Clinical outcomes of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding according to the risk indicated by Glasgow-Blatchford risk score-computed tomography score in the emergency room.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(6):1176-1185. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2022.099. Epub 2022 Nov 1.

DOI:10.3904/kjim.2022.099
PMID:36375488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9666247/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Acute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding is a significant emergency situation with a mortality rate of 2% to 10%. Therefore, initial risk stratification is important for proper management. We aimed to evaluate the role of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for risk stratification in patients with acute UGI bleeding in the emergency room (ER).

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with UGI bleeding in the ER. Glasgow-Blatchford risk score-computed tomography (GBS-CT) was assessed using a combination of GBS and the MDCT scan scoring system.

RESULTS

Of the 297 patients with UGI bleeding, 124 (41.8%) underwent abdominal MDCT. Among them, 90.3% were classified as high-risk by GBS, and five patients died (4.0%). Rebleeding occurred in nine patients (7.3%). The high-risk GBS-CT group had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (10.5% in high-risk vs. 1.4% in moderate risk vs. 0% in low-risk, p = 0.049), transfusion amount (p < 0.001), and endoscopic hemostasis (p < 0.001) compared to the moderate- and low-risk groups.

CONCLUSION

Adding MDCT scans to the existing validated prognosis model when predicting the risk of UGI bleeding in patients in the ER plays a significant role in determining in-hospital mortality, transfusions, and the need for endoscopic hemostasis.

摘要

背景/目的:急性上消化道(UGI)出血是一种具有 2%至 10%死亡率的重大紧急情况。因此,初始风险分层对于适当的管理很重要。我们旨在评估对比增强多排螺旋 CT(MDCT)在急诊室(ER)急性 UGI 出血患者中的风险分层作用。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了 ER 中出现 UGI 出血的患者。使用 GBS 和 MDCT 扫描评分系统的组合评估格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德风险评分-计算机断层扫描(GBS-CT)。

结果

在 297 例 UGI 出血患者中,124 例(41.8%)接受了腹部 MDCT 检查。其中,90.3%的患者根据 GBS 被归类为高风险,有 5 例患者死亡(4.0%)。9 例患者发生再出血(7.3%)。高风险 GBS-CT 组的住院死亡率显著更高(高风险组为 10.5%,中风险组为 1.4%,低风险组为 0%,p = 0.049)、输血量更多(p < 0.001),且需要内镜止血(p < 0.001)的比例也更高。

结论

在预测 ER 中 UGI 出血患者的预后时,将 MDCT 扫描添加到现有的验证预后模型中,对于确定住院死亡率、输血需求和内镜止血的必要性具有重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238f/9666247/974540962577/kjim-2022-099f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238f/9666247/b9e8fada365a/kjim-2022-099f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238f/9666247/974540962577/kjim-2022-099f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238f/9666247/b9e8fada365a/kjim-2022-099f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238f/9666247/974540962577/kjim-2022-099f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding according to the risk indicated by Glasgow-Blatchford risk score-computed tomography score in the emergency room.根据急诊室格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德风险评分-计算机断层扫描评分提示的风险,急性上消化道出血的临床结局。
Korean J Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(6):1176-1185. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2022.099. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
2
Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分系统与AIMS65评分系统在急诊科上消化道出血风险分层中的比较
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):22-30. doi: 10.1111/acem.12554. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
3
Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.改良早期预警评分、格拉斯哥布拉奇福德评分及内镜检查前罗卡尔评分在预测上消化道出血急诊患者预后中的有效性
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Dec 30;23:109. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0194-z.
4
Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.老年急性上消化道出血患者风险分层的三种评分系统比较。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Apr;17(4):575-583. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12757. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
5
The prognostic significance of the risk scores at upper gastrointestinal bleeding.上消化道出血风险评分的预后意义。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;22(8):1099-1108. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_193_18.
6
Mortality Risk Scoring System in Patients after Bleeding from Cancers in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract.上消化道出血癌症患者的死亡率风险评分系统。
Gut Liver. 2024 Mar 15;18(2):222-230. doi: 10.5009/gnl230069. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
7
Prospective multicenter validation of the Glasgow Blatchford bleeding score in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting at an emergency department.格拉斯哥布拉奇福德出血评分在急诊科就诊的上消化道出血患者管理中的前瞻性多中心验证
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Sep;27(9):1011-6. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000402.
8
External validation of Glasgow-Blatchford, modified Glasgow-Blatchford and CANUKA scores to identify low-risk patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study.在急诊室中使用 Glasgow-Blatchford、改良 Glasgow-Blatchford 和 CANUKA 评分对外科识别上消化道出血低危患者的外部验证:一项回顾性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Jun;40(6):451-457. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-213052. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
9
Development, Validation, and Comparative Assessment of an International Scoring System to Determine Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.国际上用于确定上消化道出血风险的评分系统的开发、验证和比较评估。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;17(6):1121-1129.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.039. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
10
Both Full Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Modified Glasgow-Blatchford Score Predict the Need for Intervention and Mortality in Patients with Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.无论是完整格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分还是改良格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分,都可预测急性下消化道出血患者的干预需求和死亡率。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Nov;63(11):3020-3025. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5203-4. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The future of critical care: AI-powered mortality prediction for acute variceal gastrointestinal bleeding and acute non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding patients.重症监护的未来:人工智能助力预测急性静脉曲张性胃肠道出血和急性非静脉曲张性胃肠道出血患者的死亡率
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 16;12:1580094. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1580094. eCollection 2025.
2
Etiology and Short-Term Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Presenting at the Emergency Department in a Tertiary Hospital in a Low Resource Setting-A Prospective Cohort Study.资源匮乏地区一家三级医院急诊科就诊的上消化道出血患者的病因及短期预后——一项前瞻性队列研究
JGH Open. 2025 May 4;9(5):e70167. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70167. eCollection 2025 May.
3

本文引用的文献

1
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Therapies for Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Expert Review.AGA 临床实践更新:内镜治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血:专家综述。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Sep;159(3):1120-1128. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.095. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
2
Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Guideline Recommendations From the International Consensus Group.非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的管理:国际共识组的指南推荐。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 3;171(11):805-822. doi: 10.7326/M19-1795. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
3
Computed Tomography: Return on Investment and Regional Disparity Factor Analysis.
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predict outcome of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in emergency.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可预测急诊上消化道出血的预后。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 8;11:1366715. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1366715. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparison and validation of the Japanese score and other scoring systems in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: A retrospective study.比较和验证日本评分与其他评分系统在消化性溃疡出血患者中的应用:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 25;102(34):e34986. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034986.
5
Seeking a better risk-prediction model for upper gastrointestinal bleeding.寻找一种更好的上消化道出血风险预测模型。
Korean J Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(6):1138-1139. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2022.324. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
计算机断层扫描:投资回报率与区域差异因素分析
Front Public Health. 2019 Jan 10;6:380. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00380. eCollection 2018.
4
New Developments in Managing Variceal Bleeding.处理食管胃静脉曲张出血的新进展。
Gastroenterology. 2018 May;154(7):1964-1969. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.02.023. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
5
Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.上消化道出血患者风险评分系统的比较:国际多中心前瞻性研究
BMJ. 2017 Jan 4;356:i6432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6432.
6
Relationship between timing of endoscopy and mortality in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a nationwide cohort study.消化性溃疡出血患者内镜检查时机与死亡率的关系:一项全国性队列研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May;85(5):936-944.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.049. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
7
ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.美国胃肠病学会临床指南:急性下消化道出血患者的管理
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr;111(4):459-74. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.41. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
8
ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Small Bowel Bleeding.美国胃肠病学会临床指南:小肠出血的诊断与管理
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep;110(9):1265-87; quiz 1288. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.246. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
9
Role of urgent contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in patients undergoing early colonoscopy.急诊对比增强多层螺旋CT在接受早期结肠镜检查的急性下消化道出血患者中的作用
J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec;50(12):1162-72. doi: 10.1007/s00535-015-1069-9. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
10
Epidemiology, diagnosis and early patient management of esophagogastric hemorrhage.食管胃出血的流行病学、诊断及患者早期管理
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2014 Dec;43(4):765-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Oct 3.