• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让他们参与进来:肥胖干预中采用和参与的社会和行为决定因素。

Getting them through the door: Social and behavioral determinants of uptake and engagement in an obesity intervention.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, W2 1PG London, UK; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK.

Department of Pediatrics, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.

出版信息

Obes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Jan-Feb;17(1):86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.orcp.2022.11.002
PMID:36376161
Abstract

Using data from a large-scale screening program (N = 19634), we aimed to prospectively identify factors predicting uptake (i.e. acceptance of the invitation) and engagement (i.e. participation in at least two sessions) in a multi-component-intensive-behavioral-intervention for obesity-management (MBIOM) intervention targeting adolescents (n = 2862; 12-14 years; BMI ≥90th percentile). Approximately one third of adolescents most in need of weight management declined the initial invitation to enter the MBIOM. Poor diet, sedentary behavior, and parental education predicted willingness to enter and stay in the intervention, however measured body mass index did not matter. Perceived family support, instead of initial motivation, facilitated engagement. Our results provide new insights on the importance of regional socio-geographical factors including trust in local authorities.

摘要

我们使用一项大规模筛查项目的数据(N=19634),旨在前瞻性地确定影响接受(即接受邀请)和参与(即至少参加两个疗程)多组分强化行为干预肥胖管理(MBIOM)的因素。该项目针对青少年(n=2862;12-14 岁;BMI≥第 90 百分位数)。大约三分之一最需要体重管理的青少年拒绝了最初参加 MBIOM 的邀请。不良饮食、久坐行为和父母教育水平预测了进入和留在干预中的意愿,而体重指数的测量值则无关紧要。与最初的动机相比,感知到的家庭支持促进了参与。我们的研究结果提供了新的见解,强调了区域社会地理因素的重要性,包括对地方当局的信任。

相似文献

1
Getting them through the door: Social and behavioral determinants of uptake and engagement in an obesity intervention.让他们参与进来:肥胖干预中采用和参与的社会和行为决定因素。
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Jan-Feb;17(1):86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
2
"PoZdro!" as an example of a successful multicenter programme for obesity management and healthy lifestyle promotion in children and adolescents - programme protocol and preliminary results from the first intervention site.“PoZdro!”作为儿童和青少年肥胖管理及健康生活方式促进的多中心成功项目范例——项目方案及首个干预点的初步结果。
Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2020;26(1):22-26. doi: 10.5114/pedm.2020.94393.
3
Mid-way and post-intervention effects on potential determinants of physical activity and sedentary behavior, results of the HEIA study - a multi-component school-based randomized trial.中期和干预后对身体活动和久坐行为潜在决定因素的影响,HEIA 研究的结果-一项多组分基于学校的随机试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 May 29;9:63. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-63.
4
Baseline Dietary Restraint Predicts Negative Treatment Outcomes after 12 Months in Children and Adolescents with Obesity Participating in a Lifestyle Intervention.基线饮食抑制预测肥胖儿童和青少年参与生活方式干预 12 个月后的负面治疗结果。
Obes Facts. 2019;12(2):179-189. doi: 10.1159/000496940. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
5
A socio-ecological approach promoting physical activity and limiting sedentary behavior in adolescence showed weight benefits maintained 2.5 years after intervention cessation.促进青少年身体活动和限制久坐行为的社会生态学方法显示,干预停止 2.5 年后,体重仍有获益。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Jul;38(7):936-43. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.23. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
6
The CANadian Pediatric Weight management Registry (CANPWR): study protocol.加拿大儿科体重管理登记研究(CANPWR):研究方案。
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Jun 23;14:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-161.
7
8
Screening for Obesity in Children and Adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.儿童和青少年肥胖筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2417-2426. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.6803.
9
End-user perspectives to inform policy and program decisions: a qualitative and quantitative content analysis of lifestyle treatment recommendations by adolescents with obesity.为政策和项目决策提供参考的终端用户视角:对肥胖青少年生活方式治疗建议的定性和定量内容分析
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1749-3.
10
The CHIRPY DRAGON intervention in preventing obesity in Chinese primary-school--aged children: A cluster-randomised controlled trial.振翅之龙干预对中国小学生肥胖预防的效果:一项整群随机对照试验
PLoS Med. 2019 Nov 26;16(11):e1002971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002971. eCollection 2019 Nov.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of motivation in weight reduction programs for children and adolescents with overweight or obesity: a systematic review.动机在超重或肥胖儿童及青少年减肥计划中的作用:一项系统综述。
Eat Weight Disord. 2025 Jul 9;30(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s40519-025-01763-y.