Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Minnesota, MMC 741, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Division of Hospital Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Apr;38(5):1224-1231. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07912-8. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
Secure text messaging systems (STMS) offer HIPAA-compliant text messaging and mobile phone call functionalities that are more efficient than traditional paging. Although some studies associate improved provider satisfaction and healthcare delivery with STMS use, healthcare organizations continue to struggle with achieving widespread and sustained STMS adoption.
To understand the barriers to adoption of an STMS among physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs).
We qualitatively analyzed free-text comments that clinicians (physicians and APPs) across a large healthcare organization offered on a survey about STMS perceptions.
A total of 1110 clinicians who provided a free-text comment in response to one of four open-ended survey questions.
Data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach and constant comparative method to characterize responses and identify themes.
The overall survey response rate was 20.5% (n = 1254). Clinicians familiar with the STMS frequently believed the STMS was unnecessary (existing tools worked well enough) and would overburden them with more communications. They were frustrated that the STMS app had to be downloaded onto their personal mobile device and that it drained their battery. Ambiguity regarding who was reachable in the app led to missed messages and drove distrust of the STMS. Clinicians saw the exclusion of other care team members (e.g., nurses) from the STMS as problematic; however, some clinicians at hospitals with expanded STMS access complained of excessive messages. Secondhand reports of several of these barriers prevented new users from downloading the app and contributed to ongoing low use.
Clinicians are reluctant to adopt an STMS that does not offer a clear and trustworthy communication benefit to offset its potential burden and intrusiveness. Our findings can be incorporated into STMS implementation strategies that maximize active users by targeting and mitigating barriers to adoption.
安全短信系统 (STMS) 提供符合 HIPAA 标准的短信和手机通话功能,比传统传呼更高效。尽管一些研究表明 STMS 的使用与提供者满意度和医疗保健服务的提高相关,但医疗保健组织仍在努力实现 STMS 的广泛和持续采用。
了解医生和高级实践提供者 (APP) 采用 STMS 的障碍。
我们对一家大型医疗机构的临床医生(医生和 APP)在关于 STMS 认知的调查中提供的自由文本评论进行了定性分析。
共有 1110 名临床医生对四个开放式调查问题中的一个提供了自由文本评论。
使用扎根理论方法和恒定比较方法对数据进行分析,以描述和识别主题。
总体调查回复率为 20.5%(n = 1254)。熟悉 STMS 的临床医生经常认为 STMS 没有必要(现有工具已经足够好用),并且会给他们带来更多的沟通负担。他们对 STMS 应用程序必须下载到他们的个人移动设备上以及电池电量消耗感到不满。对在应用程序中谁可以联系到的模糊性导致了信息的遗漏,并导致对 STMS 的不信任。临床医生认为 STMS 将其他护理团队成员(如护士)排除在外是有问题的;然而,一些在扩大 STMS 访问权限的医院的临床医生则抱怨信息过多。这些障碍的二手报告阻止了新用户下载应用程序,并导致持续低使用率。
临床医生不愿意采用 STMS,如果它不能提供明确且值得信赖的沟通优势,以抵消其潜在的负担和干扰性。我们的研究结果可以纳入 STMS 实施策略中,通过针对和减轻采用障碍来最大限度地提高活跃用户数量。