Jin Tao, Chen Ze-Hua, Liang Pan-Ping, Li Ze-Dong, He Feng-Jun, Chen Zheng-Wen, Hu Jian-Kun, Yang Kun
Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China; Laboratory of Gastric Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China.
Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China; Laboratory of Gastric Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, JinTang Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China.
Surgery. 2023 Feb;173(2):375-382. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.10.016. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
Vagus nerve-preserving gastrectomy is increasingly popular in treating gastric cancer in the early stage, however the long and short-term outcomes after gastrectomy while preserving the celiac branch of the vagus nerve are not well defined. We aimed to summarize and compare perioperative and longer-term outcomes after celiac branch vagus nerve-preserving gastrectomy (CBP, preserving both the celiac and hepatic branches of the vagus nerve), compared to those without CBP (non-CBP, only the hepatic branch of the vagus nerve is preserved).
We searched the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases for papers published before October 2021. The primary results were evaluated by short-term and long-term postoperative complications, whereas the secondary outcomes included surgery-related parameters, recovery-related parameters and overall survival. Random-effects or fixed-effects model were used to estimate odds ratio, and weighted mean difference for the outcomes. The underlying publication bias was identified via funnel charts, Begg's test and Egger's test. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by removing the research one by one.
A total of 9 studies consisting of 8 retrospective studies and one randomized control trial were included. The analysis included 1,109 patients, with 568 (51.2%) of patients receiving CBP and 541 (48.8%) patients who received non-CBP. The CBP group had a shorter time in terms of first flatus (weighted mean difference = -0.436, 95% confidence interval: -0.603 to -0.269; P < 0.001) and hospital stay (weighted mean difference = -0.456, 95% confidence interval: -0.874 to -0.037, P = 0.033) than the non-CBP group, but the time to the start of oral intake was comparable between the groups. Regarding short-term complications and surgery-related parameters, between CBP and non-CBP, no evident differences were observed in pancreatic complications, anastomotic leakage, postoperative bleeding, operation time, blood loss or lymph nodes examined. In terms of long-term complications, the incidence of gallstones in CBP was lower than that in non-CBP (odds ratio = 0.582, 95% confidence interval: 0.356-0.953, P = 0.031), and the incidence of bile reflux in CBP was lower than that in non-CBP (odds ratio = 0.473, 95% confidence interval: 0.280-0.800, P = 0.005). However, the prevalence rates of diarrhea, early dumping syndrome, esophageal reflux, and delayed gastric emptying were comparable between CBP and non-CBP.
The present research showed that gastric cancer patients in the early stage under CBP were superior to those without CBP in terms of incidence of gallstones, bile reflux, time of first flatus and hospital stay. Furthermore, it is imperative to conduct randomized control studies with larger sample sizes to determine the oncological survival outcomes when preserving the celiac branch.
保留迷走神经的胃癌切除术在早期胃癌治疗中越来越受欢迎,然而,保留迷走神经腹腔支的胃癌切除术后的短期和长期结果尚不明确。我们旨在总结和比较保留腹腔支迷走神经的胃癌切除术(CBP,保留迷走神经的腹腔支和肝支)与未行CBP(非CBP,仅保留迷走神经的肝支)术后的围手术期和长期结果。
我们检索了Embase、PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和科学网数据库中2021年10月之前发表的论文。主要结果通过术后短期和长期并发症进行评估,次要结果包括手术相关参数、恢复相关参数和总生存期。采用随机效应或固定效应模型估计比值比和结果的加权平均差。通过漏斗图、Begg检验和Egger检验识别潜在的发表偏倚。通过逐一剔除研究进行敏感性分析。
共纳入9项研究,其中8项回顾性研究和1项随机对照试验。分析包括1109例患者,其中568例(51.2%)接受CBP,541例(48.8%)接受非CBP。CBP组首次排气时间(加权平均差=-0.436,95%置信区间:-0.603至-0.269;P<0.001)和住院时间(加权平均差=-0.456,95%置信区间:-0.874至-0.037,P=0.033)比非CBP组短,但两组开始经口进食的时间相当。关于短期并发症和手术相关参数,CBP组和非CBP组在胰腺并发症、吻合口漏、术后出血、手术时间、失血量或检查的淋巴结方面未观察到明显差异。在长期并发症方面,CBP组胆结石的发生率低于非CBP组(比值比=0.582,95%置信区间:0.356-0.953,P=0.031),CBP组胆汁反流的发生率低于非CBP组(比值比=0.473,95%置信区间:0.280-0.800,P=0.)。然而,CBP组和非CBP组腹泻、早期倾倒综合征、食管反流和胃排空延迟的发生率相当。
本研究表明,早期胃癌患者行CBP在胆结石发生率、胆汁反流、首次排气时间和住院时间方面优于未行CBP的患者。此外,必须进行更大样本量的随机对照研究,以确定保留腹腔支时的肿瘤学生存结果。