Suppr超能文献

2013 - 2018年期间印度北部某邦母婴死亡报告系统分析

Analysis of Maternal and Infant Death Reporting System (MIDRS) in a North Indian State during 2013-2018.

作者信息

Verma Madhur, Tripathy Jaya Prasad, Arora Varun, Kaur Harmanjeet, Parija Pragyan Paramita, Gupta Madhu, Gupta Rakesh

机构信息

Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.

Department of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Jul;11(7):3537-3545. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2315_21. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Haryana launched the Maternal and Infant Death Reporting System (MIDRS) in 2013 to report deaths and their causes. We evaluated the system in terms of its data quality, accuracy, and timing of reporting.

METHODS

Secondary data analysis of data about the maternal, infant, and child deaths from the state level MIDRS portal from 2013 to 2018. The portal combines infant and maternal deaths and stillbirths reported through passive and active surveillance. We used the descriptive measure of statistics (proportion) to describe the characteristics and causes of neonatal, post-neonatal, and maternal deaths.

RESULTS

Of 1,18, 028 neonatal deaths, 39% (46,140) neonates died at a government facility. Gender was not recorded in 7,093 (6.0%) deaths. "Others" was a predominant category (14,664, 53%) of death. Of 2,842 maternal deaths, the cause of death was unknown in 465 (16.4%) deaths and mentioned as "others" in 1,618 (56.9%) instances. Nearly 60% of maternal deaths occurred at a health facility. Stillbirth was published as a cause of death in 228 (7.8%) child deaths (1-5 years). Missing data were observed in critical variables such as the timing of maternal mortality (50, 1.8%) and sex of child (4884, 4.3%).

CONCLUSION

Delay in reporting, inconsistencies in data, and missing information were some challenges. Ascertainment of the exact cause of death needs to be improved through better training.

摘要

背景

哈里亚纳邦于2013年启动了母婴死亡报告系统(MIDRS),以报告死亡情况及其原因。我们从数据质量、准确性和报告及时性方面对该系统进行了评估。

方法

对2013年至2018年邦级MIDRS门户网站上有关孕产妇、婴儿和儿童死亡的数据进行二次数据分析。该门户网站整合了通过被动和主动监测报告的婴儿、孕产妇死亡及死产情况。我们使用统计学描述性指标(比例)来描述新生儿、新生儿后期和孕产妇死亡的特征及原因。

结果

在118,028例新生儿死亡中,39%(46,140例)新生儿在政府机构死亡。7,093例(6.0%)死亡未记录性别。“其他”是主要的死亡类别(14,664例,53%)。在2,842例孕产妇死亡中,465例(16.4%)死亡原因不明,1,618例(56.9%)被列为“其他”。近60%的孕产妇死亡发生在医疗机构。在228例(7.8%)1至5岁儿童死亡中,死产被列为死亡原因。在关键变量中存在数据缺失情况,如孕产妇死亡时间(50例,1.8%)和儿童性别(4,884例,4.3%)。

结论

报告延迟、数据不一致和信息缺失是一些挑战。需要通过更好的培训来改进死亡确切原因的确定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a15/9648265/8abbf7114c4a/JFMPC-11-3537-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验