• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一款移动健康数据采集应用程序在临床癌症试验随访中的性能与可用性评估

Performance and usability evaluation of a mobile health data capture application in clinical cancer trials follow-up.

作者信息

Paulissen John M J, Zegers Catharina M L, Nijsten Iverna R, Reiters Pascalle H C M, Houben Ruud M, Eekers Daniëlle B P, Roelofs Erik

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Center+, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;24:107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.10.005. eCollection 2022 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.10.005
PMID:36387779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9641052/
Abstract

Mobile health data capture applications (mHDA's) may improve communication between healthcare providers and patients. However, there is limited literature about the use of mHDA's facilitating clinical trials. In this study, the effectiveness of an application, supporting follow-up visits of cancer trial participants was investigated. Twenty participants were provided with an e-questionnaire via the mHDA. Participants rated the usability of the application as high performing (mean Systems Usability Scale 87 points). The research team rated the mHDA as highly applicable and efficient in preparing visits. Anamnesis, physical examination and agreement on further policy were performed within an average of 31 min.

摘要

移动健康数据采集应用程序(mHDA)可能会改善医疗服务提供者与患者之间的沟通。然而,关于使用mHDA促进临床试验的文献有限。在本研究中,对一款支持癌症试验参与者随访的应用程序的有效性进行了调查。通过mHDA为20名参与者提供了电子问卷。参与者将该应用程序的可用性评为高性能(系统可用性量表平均87分)。研究团队将mHDA评为在准备访视方面具有高度适用性和高效性。平均31分钟内完成了病史采集、体格检查以及关于进一步治疗方案的商定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f395/9641052/0019b789a307/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f395/9641052/8ef6afb746d0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f395/9641052/db90c4e94a37/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f395/9641052/5d5010c913a3/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f395/9641052/0019b789a307/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f395/9641052/8ef6afb746d0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f395/9641052/db90c4e94a37/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f395/9641052/5d5010c913a3/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f395/9641052/0019b789a307/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance and usability evaluation of a mobile health data capture application in clinical cancer trials follow-up.一款移动健康数据采集应用程序在临床癌症试验随访中的性能与可用性评估
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;24:107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.10.005. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
A usability design checklist for Mobile electronic data capturing forms: the validation process.移动电子数据采集表单的可用性设计检查表:验证过程。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jan 9;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0718-3.
3
Development of an Intervention Targeting Multiple Health Behaviors Among High School Students: Participatory Design Study Using Heuristic Evaluation and Usability Testing.开发一项针对高中生多种健康行为的干预措施:使用启发式评估和可用性测试的参与式设计研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 29;8(10):e17999. doi: 10.2196/17999.
4
Usability Evaluation of an Offline Electronic Data Capture App in a Prospective Multicenter Dementia Registry (digiDEM Bayern): Mixed Method Study.前瞻性多中心痴呆症登记处(巴伐利亚数字痴呆症登记处)中一款离线电子数据采集应用程序的可用性评估:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Nov 3;5(11):e31649. doi: 10.2196/31649.
5
An Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Mobile App for Data Collection in Type A Hemophilia: Design and Usability Study.一款用于甲型血友病数据收集的电子患者报告结局移动应用程序:设计与可用性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Dec 1;5(12):e25071. doi: 10.2196/25071.
6
Usability Evaluations of Mobile Mental Health Technologies: Systematic Review.移动心理健康技术的可用性评估:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 6;22(1):e15337. doi: 10.2196/15337.
7
Patients' Use of Mobile Health for Self-management of Knee Osteoarthritis: Results of a 6-Week Pilot Study.患者使用移动健康技术进行膝关节骨关节炎自我管理:一项为期6周的试点研究结果
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Nov 25;5(11):e30495. doi: 10.2196/30495.
8
Usability Testing of a Patient-Centered Mobile Health App for Supporting and Guiding the Pediatric Emergency Department Patient Journey: Mixed Methods Study.一款以患者为中心的移动健康应用程序在支持和引导儿科急诊科患者就医过程中的可用性测试:混合方法研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Mar 15;5(1):e25540. doi: 10.2196/25540.
9
Use of a Mobile App for the Process Evaluation of an Intervention in Health Care: Development and Usability Study.使用移动应用程序进行医疗保健干预的过程评估:开发与可用性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Oct 28;5(10):e20739. doi: 10.2196/20739.
10
Studying Microtemporal, Within-Person Processes of Diet, Physical Activity, and Related Factors Using the APPetite-Mobile-App: Feasibility, Usability, and Validation Study.使用 APPetite-Mobile-App 研究饮食、身体活动及相关因素的微时间、个体内过程:可行性、易用性和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 5;23(7):e25850. doi: 10.2196/25850.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing and validating a content quality evaluation tool for cancer mobile applications.开发并验证一款癌症移动应用的内容质量评估工具。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):1494. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13112-w.
2
Multilingual Framework for Risk Assessment and Symptom Tracking (MRAST).多语言风险评估和症状跟踪框架(MRAST)。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;24(4):1101. doi: 10.3390/s24041101.
3
Mobile-Based Application Interventions to Enhance Cancer Control and Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.基于移动设备的应用干预措施在中低收入国家增强癌症防控和照护的系统评价

本文引用的文献

1
System Usability Scale Benchmarking for Digital Health Apps: Meta-analysis.系统可用性量表在数字健康应用程序中的基准测试:荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 18;10(8):e37290. doi: 10.2196/37290.
2
Burden of cancer trial participation: A qualitative sub-study of the INTERIM feasibility RCT.癌症试验参与的负担:INTERIM 可行性 RCT 的定性子研究。
Chronic Illn. 2023 Mar;19(1):81-94. doi: 10.1177/17423953211060253. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
3
Quality of a Supporting Mobile App for Rheumatic Patients: Patient-Based Assessment Using the User Version of the Mobile Application Scale (uMARS).
Int J Public Health. 2023 Dec 5;68:1606413. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606413. eCollection 2023.
一款风湿性疾病患者辅助移动应用程序的质量:使用移动应用程序量表用户版(uMARS)进行基于患者的评估。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 22;8:715345. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.715345. eCollection 2021.
4
User Evaluation of the Swedish Patient Accessible Electronic Health Record: System Usability Scale.瑞典患者可访问电子健康记录的用户评估:系统可用性量表
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Jul 27;8(3):e24927. doi: 10.2196/24927.
5
Importance of proper conduct of clinical trials.正确开展临床试验的重要性。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Feb;126(2):354-356. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.030. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
6
Evaluation of Mobile Health Applications to Track Patient-Reported Outcomes for Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review.评估移动健康应用程序以跟踪肿瘤患者自我报告的结果:一项系统综述。
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jan-Feb;6(1):100576. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.09.016. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
7
Novel mobile application for direct communication between pharmacists and patients treated with oral antineoplastic agents.新型移动应用程序,用于口服抗肿瘤药物治疗的药师与患者之间的直接沟通。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Aug 20;77(17):1393-1402. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa144.
8
Acceptability and usability of a mobile application for management and surveillance of vector-borne diseases in Colombia: An implementation study.一种用于管理和监测哥伦比亚媒介传播疾病的移动应用程序的可接受性和可用性:一项实施研究。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233269. eCollection 2020.
9
The research burden of randomized controlled trial participation: a systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence.随机对照试验参与的研究负担:定性证据的系统主题综合分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Jan 20;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1476-5.
10
Users' acceptability of a mobile application for persons with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.用户对 2 型糖尿病患者移动应用程序的接受度:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 6;19(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4486-2.