Shewchuk Brittany, Green Lee A, Barber Tanya, Miller Jean, Teare Sylvia, Campbell-Scherer Denise, Mrklas Kelly J, Li Linda C, Marlett Nancy, Wasylak Tracy, Lopatina Elena, McCaughey Deirdre, Marshall Deborah A
Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Nov 25;5(11):e30495. doi: 10.2196/30495.
In a previous study, a prototype mobile health (mHealth) app was co-designed with patients, family physicians, and researchers to enhance self-management and optimize conservative management for patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA).
This study aims to evaluate the overall usability, quality, and effectiveness of the mHealth app prototype for aiding knee OA self-management from the perspectives of patients with OA and health care providers (HCPs).
Using methods triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data, we conducted a pilot evaluation of an mHealth app prototype that was codeveloped with patients and HCPs. We recruited adult patients aged ≥20 years with early knee OA (n=18) who experienced knee pain on most days of the month at any time in the past and HCPs (n=7) to participate. In the qualitative assessment, patient and HCP perspectives were elicited on the likeability and usefulness of app features and functionalities and the perceived impact of the app on patient-HCP communication. The quantitative assessment involved evaluating the app using usability, quality, and effectiveness metrics. Patient baseline assessments included a semistructured interview and survey to gather demographics and assess the quality of life (European Quality-of-Life 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L]) and patient activation (patient activation measure [PAM]). Following the 6-week usability trial period, a follow-up survey assessed patients' perceptions of app usability and quality and longitudinal changes in quality of life and patient activation. Semistructured interviews and surveys were also conducted with HCPs (n=7) at baseline to evaluate the usability and quality of the app prototype.
Interviews with patients and HCPs revealed overall positive impressions of the app prototype features and functionalities related to likeability and usefulness. Between the baseline and follow-up patient assessments, the mean EQ-5D-5L scores improved from 0.77 to 0.67 (P=.04), and PAM scores increased from 80.4 to 87.9 (P=.01). Following the 6-week evaluation, patients reported a mean System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 57.8, indicating marginal acceptability according to SUS cutoffs. The mean number of goals set during the usability period was 2.47 (SD 3.08), and the mean number of activities completed for knee OA self-management during the study period was 22.2 (SD 17.8). Spearman rank correlation (r) calculations revealed that the follow-up PAM scores were weakly correlated (r=-0.32) with the number of goals achieved and the number (r=0.19) of activities performed during the 6-week usability period. HCPs reported a mean SUS score of 39.1, indicating unacceptable usability.
This evidence-based and patient-centered app prototype represents a potential use of mHealth for improving outcomes and enhancing conservative care by promoting patient activation and patient-HCP communication regarding OA management. However, future iterations of the app prototype are required to address the limitations related to usability and quality.
在之前的一项研究中,一款移动健康(mHealth)应用程序原型与患者、家庭医生和研究人员共同设计,以加强自我管理并优化轻度至中度膝骨关节炎(OA)患者的保守治疗。
本研究旨在从OA患者和医疗服务提供者(HCPs)的角度评估该mHealth应用程序原型在辅助膝OA自我管理方面的整体可用性、质量和有效性。
采用定性和定量数据的三角测量法,我们对与患者和HCPs共同开发的mHealth应用程序原型进行了试点评估。我们招募了年龄≥20岁、患有早期膝OA且在过去任何时候每月大多数日子都经历膝关节疼痛的成年患者(n = 18)以及HCPs(n = 7)参与。在定性评估中,收集了患者和HCPs对应用程序功能和特性的喜爱程度及有用性的看法,以及该应用程序对患者与HCPs沟通的感知影响。定量评估涉及使用可用性、质量和有效性指标对应用程序进行评估。患者基线评估包括半结构化访谈和调查,以收集人口统计学信息,并评估生活质量(欧洲生活质量五维度五级问卷[EQ - 5D - 5L])和患者激活度(患者激活度测量[PAM])。在为期6周的可用性试验期结束后,一项随访调查评估了患者对应用程序可用性和质量的看法以及生活质量和患者激活度的纵向变化。在基线时还对HCPs(n = 7)进行了半结构化访谈和调查,以评估应用程序原型的可用性和质量。
对患者和HCPs的访谈显示,对与喜爱程度和有用性相关的应用程序原型功能和特性总体印象良好。在患者基线和随访评估之间,EQ - 5D - 5L平均得分从0.77提高到0.67(P = 0.04),PAM得分从80.4提高到87.9(P = 0.01)。在为期6周的评估后,患者报告的系统可用性量表(SUS)平均得分为57.8,根据SUS临界值表明为勉强可接受。在可用性期间设定的目标平均数量为2.47(标准差3.08),在研究期间为膝OA自我管理完成的活动平均数量为22.2(标准差17.8)。Spearman等级相关性(r)计算显示,随访PAM得分与在为期6周的可用性期间实现的目标数量(r = - 0.32)和执行的活动数量(r = 0.19)弱相关。HCPs报告的SUS平均得分为39.1,表明可用性不可接受。
这个基于证据且以患者为中心的应用程序原型代表了mHealth在通过促进患者激活以及关于OA管理的患者与HCPs沟通来改善结局和加强保守治疗方面的一种潜在用途。然而,需要对应用程序原型进行未来迭代以解决与可用性和质量相关的局限性。