Errahmani M Y, Locquet M, Broggio D, Spoor D, Jimenez G, Camilleri J, Langendijk J A, Crijns A P G, Bernier M O, Ferrières J, Thariat J, Boveda S, Kirova Y, Loap P, Monceau V, Jacob S
Laboratory of Epidemiology, Institute for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France.
University Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022 Nov 4;38:62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.10.015. eCollection 2023 Jan.
To assess sinoatrial node (SAN) and atrioventricular node (AVN) doses for breast cancer (BC) patients treated with 3D-CRT and evaluate whether "large" cardiac structures (whole heart and four cardiac chambers) would be relevant surrogates.
This single center study was based on 116 BCE patients (56 left-sided, 60 right-sided) treated with 3D-CRT without respiratory gating strategies and few IMN irradiations from 2009 to 2013. The heart, the left and right ventricles (LV, RV), the left and right atria (LA, RA) were contoured using multi-atlases for auto-segmentation. The SAN and the AVN were manually delineated using a specific atlas. Based on regression analysis, the coefficients of determination (R) were estimated to evaluate whether "large" cardiac structures were relevant surrogates (R > 0.70) of SAN and AVN doses.
For left-sided BC, mean doses were: 3.60 ± 2.28 Gy for heart, 0.47 ± 0.24 Gy for SAN and 0.74 ± 0.29 Gy for AVN. For right-sided BC, mean heart dose was 0.60 ± 0.25 Gy, mean SAN dose was 1.57 ± 0.63 Gy (>85 % of patients with SAN doses > 1 Gy) and mean AVN dose was 0.51 ± 0.14 Gy. Among all "large" cardiac structures, RA appeared as the best surrogate for SAN doses (R > 0.80). Regarding AVN doses, the RA may also be an interesting surrogate for left-sided BC (R = 0.78), but none of "large" cardiac structures appeared as relevant surrogates among right-sided BC (all R < 0.70), except the LA for patients with IMN (R = 0.83).
In BC patients treated 10 years ago with 3D-CRT, SAN and AVN exposure was moderate but could exceed 1 Gy to the SAN in many right-sided patients with no IMN-inclusion. The RA appeared as an interesting surrogate for SAN exposure. Specific conduction nodes delineation remains necessary by using modern radiotherapy techniques.
评估接受三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)的乳腺癌(BC)患者的窦房结(SAN)和房室结(AVN)剂量,并评估“大”心脏结构(全心和四个心腔)是否可作为相关替代指标。
本单中心研究基于2009年至2013年期间接受3D-CRT治疗且未采用呼吸门控策略且极少进行调强放疗(IMN)的116例BC患者(56例左侧,60例右侧)。使用多图谱自动分割技术勾勒出心脏、左心室和右心室(LV,RV)、左心房和右心房(LA,RA)。使用特定图谱手动勾勒出SAN和AVN。基于回归分析,估计决定系数(R)以评估“大”心脏结构是否为SAN和AVN剂量的相关替代指标(R>0.70)。
对于左侧BC,平均剂量分别为:心脏3.60±2.28 Gy,SAN 0.47±0.24 Gy,AVN 0.74±0.29 Gy。对于右侧BC,平均心脏剂量为0.60±0.25 Gy,平均SAN剂量为1.57±0.63 Gy(>85%的患者SAN剂量>1 Gy),平均AVN剂量为0.51±0.14 Gy。在所有“大”心脏结构中,RA似乎是SAN剂量的最佳替代指标(R>0.80)。关于AVN剂量,RA对于左侧BC也可能是一个有意义的替代指标(R = 0.78),但在右侧BC中,除了IMN患者的LA(R = 0.83)外,没有“大”心脏结构可作为相关替代指标(所有R<0.70)。
在10年前接受3D-CRT治疗的BC患者中,SAN和AVN的照射剂量适中,但在许多未纳入IMN的右侧患者中,SAN的照射剂量可能超过1 Gy。RA似乎是SAN照射的一个有意义的替代指标。使用现代放疗技术时,仍有必要对特定传导节点进行勾勒。