Suppr超能文献

接受抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的糖尿病视网膜病变患者的青光眼引流装置侵蚀

Glaucoma Drainage Device Erosions in Patients Receiving Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Retinopathy.

作者信息

Islam Yasmin Florence Khodeja, Vanner Elizabeth A, Maharaj Arindel S R, Schwartz Stephen G, Kishor Krishna

机构信息

Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov 9;16:3681-3687. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S386033. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections are associated with an increased risk of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) erosions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted including patients with diabetic retinopathy and had a GDD implanted at a large academic institution. The rate of GDD erosions was compared between eyes that did or did not receive intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. A subanalysis was also performed the relationship between diabetic macular edema (DME) and intravitreal steroid injections and GDD erosions.

RESULTS

A total of 677 eyes from 608 patients was included. A total of 447 eyes received at least one anti-VEGF injection; 230 eyes never received such therapy. Twenty eyes (4.5%) receiving anti-VEGF had at least one erosion event, compared to 7 eyes (3.0%) of patients not receiving anti-VEGF therapy (OR 1.49, p=0.37). Diabetic macular edema was associated with a significantly increased rate of erosion in eyes not receiving anti-VEGF (71.4% versus 31.4%, p=0.034), but not in eyes receiving anti-VEGF (30.0% versus 40.7%, p=0.34). Receiving more than one specific anti-VEGF agent, an increased frequency or total number of anti-VEGF injections, or receiving intravitreal steroids were not associated with an increased risk of erosion (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients with diabetic retinopathy, the use of anti-VEGF does not result in an increased rate of GDD erosions or recurrent erosions. Further research is needed over a longer follow-up period to determine if longer or more frequent anti-VEGF treatment is a risk factor for recurrent erosions.

摘要

目的

确定玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)是否与青光眼引流装置(GDD)侵蚀风险增加相关。

患者与方法

对一家大型学术机构中植入GDD的糖尿病视网膜病变患者进行回顾性病历审查。比较接受或未接受玻璃体内抗VEGF注射的眼睛的GDD侵蚀率。还进行了一项亚分析,以研究糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)、玻璃体内注射类固醇与GDD侵蚀之间的关系。

结果

共纳入608例患者的677只眼。447只眼接受了至少一次抗VEGF注射;230只眼从未接受过此类治疗。接受抗VEGF治疗的20只眼(4.5%)至少发生过一次侵蚀事件,而未接受抗VEGF治疗的患者中有7只眼(3.0%)发生侵蚀事件(比值比1.49,p = 0.37)。糖尿病性黄斑水肿与未接受抗VEGF治疗的眼睛侵蚀率显著增加相关(71.4%对31.4%,p = 0.034),但与接受抗VEGF治疗的眼睛无关(30.0%对40.7%,p = 0.34)。接受一种以上特定抗VEGF药物、抗VEGF注射频率或总数增加,或接受玻璃体内类固醇注射与侵蚀风险增加无关(p>0.05)。

结论

在糖尿病视网膜病变患者中,使用抗VEGF不会导致GDD侵蚀率或复发性侵蚀增加。需要更长随访期的进一步研究来确定更长时间或更频繁的抗VEGF治疗是否是复发性侵蚀的危险因素。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
Glaucoma drainage devices: risk of exposure and infection.青光眼引流装置:暴露与感染风险
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep;160(3):516-521.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.05.025. Epub 2015 May 30.
8

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验