Faderman L
J Homosex. 1978 Fall;4(1):73-90. doi: 10.1300/J082v04n01_06.
Twentieth-century attitudes toward love between women are very different from those of previous centuries. Fiction and personal correspondence that antedate the work of Krafft-Ebing and Havelock Ellis in the late 19th century indicate that a much broader spectrum of expression of love and affection between women had been acceptable than that to which we have become accustomed. Medical science and psychology for the past 100 years have morbidified intense love relationships between women by inventing a syndrome of ills that supposedly accompany such affection, and by denying the validity or seriousness of the affection where such ills are clearly not present. The result has been that (until the lesbian-feminist movement) 20th-century women were largely forced to deny their love for other women unless they were willing to acknowledge their concomitant morbidity.
20世纪对女性之间爱情的态度与此前几个世纪大不相同。19世纪末克拉夫特-埃宾和哈夫洛克·埃利斯的著作之前的小说和私人信件表明,与我们如今习以为常的情况相比,女性之间表达爱和情感的范围要宽泛得多。在过去100年里,医学和心理学通过虚构一系列据称伴随这种情感而来的疾病,以及在明显不存在这些疾病的情况下否认这种情感的有效性或严肃性,将女性之间强烈的恋爱关系病态化。结果就是,在女同性恋女权运动之前,20世纪的女性在很大程度上被迫否认对其他女性的爱,除非她们愿意承认随之而来的病态。