• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

菌血症的口服降阶梯治疗:抗菌药物管理的契机?

Oral step-down for bacteraemia: an opportunity for antimicrobial stewardship?

作者信息

Platts Stephen, Payne Brendan A I, Price D Ashley, Pareja-Cebrian Lucia, Schwab Ulrich

机构信息

Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Clin Infect Pract. 2022 Nov;16:100202. doi: 10.1016/j.clinpr.2022.100202.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinpr.2022.100202
PMID:36394002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7613828/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Long courses of intravenous antimicrobial therapy are traditionally recommended for the treatment of methicillin sensitive bacteraemia (MS-SAB), but are not always completed in clinical practice. Early intravenous to oral antibiotic switch is a key component of antimicrobial stewardship. This study aimed to identify whether intravenous antibiotic duration may be safely reduced in MS-SAB.

METHODS

We performed a single-centre retrospective study of MS-SAB management. Successful outcome was defined as 90-day recurrence-free survival. Effect of intravenous antibiotic duration on 90-day recurrence risk was examined.

RESULTS

281 adult cases of MS-SAB were evaluated, of which 208 (74%) had a successful outcome. 176 cases (63%) received less than 14 days of intravenous antimicrobial therapy. Very short durations of intravenous therapy were associated with increased risk of recurrence (<7 days iv, 9.8% recurrence; 7-13 days, 1.4%; ≥14 days, 2.9%; p 0.005). This effect was robust to sensitivity analysis for total antimicrobial therapy duration of 14 days. CRP reduction of at least 37% from peak value at intravenous to oral antibiotic switch was associated with decreased risk of recurrence (<37% CRP reduction, 12% recurrence; >37%, 2.0%; p 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral antimicrobial switch may allow safe reductions in duration of intravenous therapy in MS-SAB.

摘要

目的

传统上推荐采用长疗程静脉抗菌治疗来治疗甲氧西林敏感菌血症(MS-SAB),但在临床实践中并非总能完成整个疗程。早期静脉转口服抗生素治疗是抗菌药物管理的关键组成部分。本研究旨在确定MS-SAB患者的静脉抗生素治疗疗程是否可以安全缩短。

方法

我们对MS-SAB的管理进行了一项单中心回顾性研究。成功结局定义为90天无复发存活。研究了静脉抗生素治疗疗程对90天复发风险的影响。

结果

评估了281例成年MS-SAB病例,其中208例(74%)获得成功结局。176例(63%)接受了少于14天的静脉抗菌治疗。静脉治疗疗程过短与复发风险增加相关(静脉治疗<7天,复发率9.8%;7-13天,1.4%;≥14天,2.9%;p<0.005)。对于总抗菌治疗疗程为14天的敏感性分析,该效应仍然显著。静脉转口服抗生素治疗时,C反应蛋白(CRP)从峰值至少降低37%与复发风险降低相关(CRP降低<37%,复发率12%;>37%,2.0%;p<0.001)。

结论

口服抗菌药物转换治疗可能允许安全缩短MS-SAB患者的静脉治疗疗程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d03/9768529/83d07fd924f8/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d03/9768529/3f4639ceec34/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d03/9768529/83d07fd924f8/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d03/9768529/3f4639ceec34/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d03/9768529/83d07fd924f8/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Oral step-down for bacteraemia: an opportunity for antimicrobial stewardship?菌血症的口服降阶梯治疗:抗菌药物管理的契机?
Clin Infect Pract. 2022 Nov;16:100202. doi: 10.1016/j.clinpr.2022.100202.
2
Management of bacteraemia (SAB) in the oncology patient: Further evidence supports prompt removal of central venous catheters and shorter duration of intravenous antimicrobial therapy.肿瘤患者血流感染(SAB)的管理:更多证据支持及时拔除中心静脉导管并缩短静脉抗菌治疗疗程。
Infect Prev Pract. 2020 Feb 1;2(1):100037. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2020.100037. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
Early oral switch therapy in low-risk Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SABATO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.低风险金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的早期口服转换治疗(SABATO):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Oct 9;16:450. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0973-x.
4
Association between treatment duration and mortality or relapse in adult patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a retrospective cohort study.金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症成人患者的治疗持续时间与死亡率或复发率的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 May;26(5):626-631. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.07.019. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
5
Comparable Effectiveness of Cefuroxime and Piperacillin-Tazobactam as Empirical Therapy for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.头孢呋辛与哌拉西林他唑巴坦治疗甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的等效性比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Jun 29;10(3):e0153021. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01530-21. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
6
The benefits and safety of oral sequential antibiotic therapy in non-complicated and complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.口服序贯抗生素疗法在非复杂性和复杂性金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症中的获益和安全性。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;102:554-560. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.097. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
7
Relative efficacy of cefuroxime versus dicloxacillin as definitive antimicrobial therapy in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a propensity-score adjusted retrospective cohort study.头孢呋辛与双氯西林治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的相对疗效:倾向评分调整的回顾性队列研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Feb;69(2):506-14. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt375. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
8
Comparable Outcomes of Short-Course and Prolonged-Course Therapy in Selected Cases of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Pooled Cohort Study.在某些耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症病例中,短程和长程治疗的可比结局:一项汇总队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 7;73(5):866-872. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab201.
9
Impact of antimicrobial treatment duration on outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a cohort study.抗菌治疗时间对金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症结局的影响:一项队列研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Jun;25(6):723-732. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
10
Staphylococcus aureus - selective reporting of antibiogram results and its impact on antibiotic use: Interventional study with a reference group on the effect of switching from non-selective to selective antibiotic reporting.金黄色葡萄球菌 - 抗生素药敏试验结果的选择性报告及其对抗生素使用的影响:采用参照组的干预性研究,评估从非选择性报告向选择性报告转变对抗生素使用的影响。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 Nov 6;10(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-01021-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalising intravenous to oral antibiotic switch decision making through fair interpretable machine learning.通过公平可解释的机器学习实现静脉内到口服抗生素转换决策的个性化。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 13;15(1):506. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44740-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Intravenous versus Oral Step-Down for the Treatment of Bacteremia in a Pediatric Population.静脉注射与口服逐步降级疗法用于儿科人群菌血症的治疗
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Jan 15;10(1):16. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10010016.
2
Efficacy of Early Oral Switch with β-Lactams for Low-Risk Bacteremia.β-内酰胺类药物早期口服转换治疗低危菌血症的疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jun 23;64(7). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02345-19.
3
Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infection.口服与静脉用抗生素治疗骨与关节感染。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):425-436. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710926.
4
Clinical Practice Variation Among Adult Infectious Disease Physicians in the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.成人感染病医师在金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症管理方面的临床实践差异。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 18;69(3):530-533. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy1144.
5
Partial Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Endocarditis.部分口服与静脉抗生素治疗心内膜炎。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):415-424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808312. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
6
Early oral switch therapy in low-risk Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SABATO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.低风险金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的早期口服转换治疗(SABATO):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Oct 9;16:450. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0973-x.
7
Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management.金黄色葡萄球菌感染:流行病学、病理生理学、临床表现及管理
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015 Jul;28(3):603-61. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00134-14.
8
Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a review.金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的临床管理:综述。
JAMA. 2014 Oct 1;312(13):1330-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.9743.
9
Antibiotics for treating chronic osteomyelitis in adults.用于治疗成人慢性骨髓炎的抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 6;2013(9):CD004439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004439.pub3.
10
The management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in the United Kingdom and Vietnam: a multi-centre evaluation.英国和越南金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的管理:一项多中心评估。
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 13;5(12):e14170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014170.