• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Early Oral Switch with β-Lactams for Low-Risk Bacteremia.β-内酰胺类药物早期口服转换治疗低危菌血症的疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jun 23;64(7). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02345-19.
2
Early oral switch therapy in low-risk Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SABATO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.低风险金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的早期口服转换治疗(SABATO):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Oct 9;16:450. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0973-x.
3
Early Oral Antibiotic Switch in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia: The Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) Trial Early Oral Switch Protocol.金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症中早期口服抗生素转换:金黄色葡萄球菌网络适应平台(SNAP)试验早期口服转换方案。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 15;79(4):871-887. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad666.
4
Performance of processes of care and outcomes in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者的护理流程执行情况及治疗结果
J Hosp Med. 2016 Jan;11(1):27-32. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2479. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
5
Early Oral Antibiotic Switch for Bacteremia: Many Are Called, but Few Are Chosen.早期血培养阳性菌血症的抗生素转换:应者云集,择者寥寥。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jun 23;64(7). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00317-20.
6
A Prospective Cohort Study of Durations of Bacteremia According to Different Phenotypes and a New Concept of Persistent Bacteremia.一项关于不同表型下菌血症持续时间的前瞻性队列研究和一个新的持续性菌血症概念。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Dec 20;64(1). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01656-19.
7
Efficacy of seven and fourteen days of antibiotic treatment in uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB7): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.七天和十四天抗生素治疗方案对单纯金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症(SAB7)的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 May 2;20(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3357-9.
8
Comparable Outcomes of Short-Course and Prolonged-Course Therapy in Selected Cases of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Pooled Cohort Study.在某些耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症病例中,短程和长程治疗的可比结局:一项汇总队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 7;73(5):866-872. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab201.
9
Effect of Vancomycin or Daptomycin With vs Without an Antistaphylococcal β-Lactam on Mortality, Bacteremia, Relapse, or Treatment Failure in Patients With MRSA Bacteremia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.万古霉素或达托霉素联合与不联合抗葡萄球菌β-内酰胺类药物治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者的死亡率、菌血症、复发或治疗失败的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 11;323(6):527-537. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0103.
10
Treatment duration for uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia to prevent relapse: analysis of a prospective observational cohort study.治疗单纯金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症以预防复发的疗程:一项前瞻性观察队列研究分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Mar;57(3):1150-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01021-12. Epub 2012 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Common Bacterial Infections in Persons Who Inject Drugs.注射吸毒者中的常见细菌感染
Medicines (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;12(2):8. doi: 10.3390/medicines12020008.
2
Transitioning to oral therapy compared to IV in bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血流感染中从静脉注射治疗转换为口服治疗:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jan 9;87(1):265-275. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002742. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Time to Staphylococcus aureus Blood Culture Positivity as a Risk Marker of Infective Endocarditis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.金黄色葡萄球菌血培养阳性时间作为感染性心内膜炎的风险标志物:一项回顾性队列研究
Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 30;80(4):727-734. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae628.
4
Oral Antibiotics for Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.用于治疗菌血症和感染性心内膜炎的口服抗生素:当前证据与未来展望
Microorganisms. 2023 Dec 18;11(12):3004. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11123004.
5
Early Oral Antibiotic Switch in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia: The Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) Trial Early Oral Switch Protocol.金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症中早期口服抗生素转换:金黄色葡萄球菌网络适应平台(SNAP)试验早期口服转换方案。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 15;79(4):871-887. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad666.
6
An evaluation of risk factors for readmission in patients receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.接受门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗患者再入院风险因素的评估。
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2023 Sep 1;10:20499361231195966. doi: 10.1177/20499361231195966. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
7
Comparison of Oral and Intravenous Definitive Antibiotic Therapy for Beta-Hemolytic Streptococcus Species Bloodstream Infections from Soft Tissue Sources: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.口腔与静脉应用抗生素治疗源于软组织的乙型溶血性链球菌血流感染的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Jun 15;67(6):e0012023. doi: 10.1128/aac.00120-23. Epub 2023 May 16.
8
Impact of specialty on the self-reported practice of using oral antibiotic therapy for definitive treatment of bloodstream infections.专业对自我报告的使用口服抗生素疗法确定性治疗血流感染实践的影响。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Mar 9;3(1):e48. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.132. eCollection 2023.
9
Uncomplicated Streptococcal Bacteremia: The Era of Oral Antibiotic Step-down Therapy?非复杂性链球菌菌血症:口服抗生素降阶梯治疗时代?
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Mar;61(3):106736. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106736. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
10
Oral step-down for bacteraemia: an opportunity for antimicrobial stewardship?菌血症的口服降阶梯治疗:抗菌药物管理的契机?
Clin Infect Pract. 2022 Nov;16:100202. doi: 10.1016/j.clinpr.2022.100202.

本文引用的文献

1
A Survey of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Clinicians in Australia and New Zealand About the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.澳大利亚和新西兰传染病及微生物学临床医生关于金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症管理的调查
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 30;69(10):1835-1836. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz275.
2
Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infection.口服与静脉用抗生素治疗骨与关节感染。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):425-436. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710926.
3
Clinical Practice Variation Among Adult Infectious Disease Physicians in the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.成人感染病医师在金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症管理方面的临床实践差异。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 18;69(3):530-533. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy1144.
4
Benefit of Echocardiography in Patients With Bacteremia at Low Risk of Endocarditis.超声心动图在感染性心内膜炎低风险菌血症患者中的益处。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Dec 11;5(12):ofy303. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy303. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
Early Oral Switch to Linezolid for Low-risk Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study.早期口服利奈唑胺治疗金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染低危患者:一项倾向性匹配队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 18;69(3):381-387. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy916.
6
Considerations for Clinical Trials of Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection in Adults.成人金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染临床试验的考虑因素。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 15;68(5):865-872. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy774.
7
Partial Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Endocarditis.部分口服与静脉抗生素治疗心内膜炎。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):415-424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808312. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
8
When are Oral Antibiotics a Safe and Effective Choice for Bacterial Bloodstream Infections? An Evidence-Based Narrative Review.当口服抗生素是治疗细菌性血流感染的安全有效选择时?基于证据的叙述性综述。
J Hosp Med. 2018 May 1;13(5):328-335. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2949. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
9
Criteria for Identifying Patients With Bacteremia Who Are at Low Risk of Endocarditis: A Systematic Review.识别感染性心内膜炎低风险菌血症患者的标准:一项系统评价
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 24;4(4):ofx261. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx261. eCollection 2017 Fall.
10
Infectious disease consultation for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia - A systematic review and meta-analysis.金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的感染病会诊:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Infect. 2016 Jan;72(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.09.037. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

β-内酰胺类药物早期口服转换治疗低危菌血症的疗效。

Efficacy of Early Oral Switch with β-Lactams for Low-Risk Bacteremia.

机构信息

Department of Infection Services, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand

Department of Infection Services, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jun 23;64(7). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02345-19.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.02345-19
PMID:32015029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7318028/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the safety of early oral switch (EOS) prior to 14 days for low-risk bacteremia (LR-SAB), which is the primary treatment strategy used at our institution. The usual recommended therapy is 14 days of intravenous (i.v.) antibiotics. All patients with SAB at our hospital were identified between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018. Those meeting low-risk criteria (health care-associated, no evidence of deep infection or demonstrated involvement of prosthetic material, and no further positive blood cultures after 72 h) were included in the study. The primary outcome was occurrence of a SAB-related complication within 90 days. There were 469 SAB episodes during the study period, 100 (21%) of whom met inclusion criteria. EOS was performed in 84 patients. In this group, line infection was the source in 79%, methicillin-susceptible caused 95% of SABs and 74% of patients received i.v. flucloxacillin. The median durations of i.v. and oral antibiotics in the EOS group were 5 days (interquartile range [IQR], 4 to 6) and 10 days (IQR, 9 to 14), respectively. A total of 71% of patients received flucloxacillin as their EOS agent. Overall, 86% of oral step-down therapy was with beta-lactams. One patient (1%) undergoing EOS had SAB relapse within 90 days. No deaths attributable to SAB occurred within 90 days. In this low-MRSA-prevalence LR-SAB cohort, EOS was associated with a low incidence of SAB-related complications. This was achieved with oral beta-lactam therapy in most patients. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

本研究旨在评估低危菌血症(LR-SAB)患者提前至 14 天进行早期口服切换(EOS)的安全性,这是我们机构采用的主要治疗策略。通常推荐的治疗方法是静脉注射(i.v.)抗生素 14 天。我们医院所有患有 SAB 的患者均在 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间确定。符合低危标准(与医疗保健相关,无深部感染证据或证明涉及假体材料,且在 72 小时后无进一步阳性血培养)的患者被纳入研究。主要结局是在 90 天内发生 SAB 相关并发症。研究期间发生了 469 例 SAB 发作,其中 100 例(21%)符合纳入标准。对 84 例患者进行了 EOS。在该组中,84 例患者中有 79%的感染源为导管感染,耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌引起 95%的 SAB 和 74%的患者接受 i.v. 氟氯西林。EOS 组中 i.v. 和口服抗生素的中位持续时间分别为 5 天(四分位距 [IQR],4 至 6)和 10 天(IQR,9 至 14)。共有 71%的患者接受氟氯西林作为 EOS 药物。总体而言,86%的口服降级治疗是使用β-内酰胺类药物。1 名(1%)接受 EOS 的患者在 90 天内发生 SAB 复发。90 天内无 SAB 相关死亡。在本低 MRSA 流行率的 LR-SAB 队列中,EOS 与 SAB 相关并发症的发生率较低相关。这是通过大多数患者接受口服β-内酰胺类药物治疗实现的。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。