Suppr超能文献

β-内酰胺类药物早期口服转换治疗低危菌血症的疗效。

Efficacy of Early Oral Switch with β-Lactams for Low-Risk Bacteremia.

机构信息

Department of Infection Services, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand

Department of Infection Services, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jun 23;64(7). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02345-19.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the safety of early oral switch (EOS) prior to 14 days for low-risk bacteremia (LR-SAB), which is the primary treatment strategy used at our institution. The usual recommended therapy is 14 days of intravenous (i.v.) antibiotics. All patients with SAB at our hospital were identified between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018. Those meeting low-risk criteria (health care-associated, no evidence of deep infection or demonstrated involvement of prosthetic material, and no further positive blood cultures after 72 h) were included in the study. The primary outcome was occurrence of a SAB-related complication within 90 days. There were 469 SAB episodes during the study period, 100 (21%) of whom met inclusion criteria. EOS was performed in 84 patients. In this group, line infection was the source in 79%, methicillin-susceptible caused 95% of SABs and 74% of patients received i.v. flucloxacillin. The median durations of i.v. and oral antibiotics in the EOS group were 5 days (interquartile range [IQR], 4 to 6) and 10 days (IQR, 9 to 14), respectively. A total of 71% of patients received flucloxacillin as their EOS agent. Overall, 86% of oral step-down therapy was with beta-lactams. One patient (1%) undergoing EOS had SAB relapse within 90 days. No deaths attributable to SAB occurred within 90 days. In this low-MRSA-prevalence LR-SAB cohort, EOS was associated with a low incidence of SAB-related complications. This was achieved with oral beta-lactam therapy in most patients. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

本研究旨在评估低危菌血症(LR-SAB)患者提前至 14 天进行早期口服切换(EOS)的安全性,这是我们机构采用的主要治疗策略。通常推荐的治疗方法是静脉注射(i.v.)抗生素 14 天。我们医院所有患有 SAB 的患者均在 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间确定。符合低危标准(与医疗保健相关,无深部感染证据或证明涉及假体材料,且在 72 小时后无进一步阳性血培养)的患者被纳入研究。主要结局是在 90 天内发生 SAB 相关并发症。研究期间发生了 469 例 SAB 发作,其中 100 例(21%)符合纳入标准。对 84 例患者进行了 EOS。在该组中,84 例患者中有 79%的感染源为导管感染,耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌引起 95%的 SAB 和 74%的患者接受 i.v. 氟氯西林。EOS 组中 i.v. 和口服抗生素的中位持续时间分别为 5 天(四分位距 [IQR],4 至 6)和 10 天(IQR,9 至 14)。共有 71%的患者接受氟氯西林作为 EOS 药物。总体而言,86%的口服降级治疗是使用β-内酰胺类药物。1 名(1%)接受 EOS 的患者在 90 天内发生 SAB 复发。90 天内无 SAB 相关死亡。在本低 MRSA 流行率的 LR-SAB 队列中,EOS 与 SAB 相关并发症的发生率较低相关。这是通过大多数患者接受口服β-内酰胺类药物治疗实现的。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Common Bacterial Infections in Persons Who Inject Drugs.注射吸毒者中的常见细菌感染
Medicines (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;12(2):8. doi: 10.3390/medicines12020008.
9
Uncomplicated Streptococcal Bacteremia: The Era of Oral Antibiotic Step-down Therapy?非复杂性链球菌菌血症:口服抗生素降阶梯治疗时代?
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Mar;61(3):106736. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106736. Epub 2023 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

7
Partial Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Endocarditis.部分口服与静脉抗生素治疗心内膜炎。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):415-424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808312. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验