Yang Guang, Li Shangzhe, Zhang Hailong, Lu Yi
Department of Sports Medicine, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital, School of Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Nov 1;10:1041531. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1041531. eCollection 2022.
Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is typically performed for non-reconstructible radial head fractures with or without valgus stability. The fixation methods can be divided into cemented rigid fixation, such as screw fixation, and uncemented micromovement fixation, including smooth stem, press-fit, expanded device, in-growth stem, and grit-blasted stem fixations. Different fixation methods may impact long-term clinical outcomes and cause complications. This study aimed to compare the long-term follow-up outcomes of cemented and uncemented radial head prostheses. A computerized literature search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for studies on radial head prostheses, replacement, and arthroplasty published from inception to April 2022. The prostheses fixation method was divided into cemented and uncemented fixation groups. The outcomes of interest included the participant characteristics, prostheses types, clinical outcomes, reoperation rates, and complication rates during long-term follow-up. A total of 57 studies involving 2050 patients who underwent RHA were included in our analysis. Cemented fixation was used in 23 of these studies, uncemented fixation in 35 studies, and both cemented and uncemented fixations in one study. Both fixation groups showed significantly improved clinical outcomes after treatment. In particular, both the reoperation and complication rates were lower in the uncemented fixation group (12% and 22%, respectively) than that in the cemented fixation group (20% and 29%, respectively). Among the studies, uncemented monopolar fixation had the lowest reoperation rate (14%), while cemented monopolar fixation had the highest reoperation rate (36%). Regarding complication rates, uncemented bipolar fixation yielded the lowest rate (12%), while cemented bipolar fixation yielded the highest rate (34%). The range of motion and clinical outcome scores were good in both groups. Uncemented radial head prostheses had lower reoperation and complication rates than cemented prostheses. In particular, uncemented monopolar prostheses may yield the lowest reoperation rate, while uncemented bipolar prostheses may yield the lowest overall complication rate.
桡骨头置换术(RHA)通常用于治疗伴有或不伴有外翻稳定性的不可重建性桡骨头骨折。固定方法可分为骨水泥刚性固定,如螺钉固定,以及非骨水泥微动固定,包括光滑柄、压配、膨胀装置、骨长入柄和喷砂柄固定。不同的固定方法可能会影响长期临床结果并引发并发症。本研究旨在比较骨水泥型和非骨水泥型桡骨头假体的长期随访结果。在PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science数据库中进行了计算机化文献检索,以查找从创刊到2022年4月发表的关于桡骨头假体、置换和关节成形术的研究。假体固定方法分为骨水泥固定组和非骨水泥固定组。感兴趣的结果包括参与者特征、假体类型、临床结果、再次手术率和长期随访期间的并发症发生率。我们的分析共纳入了57项涉及2050例行RHA患者的研究。其中23项研究采用骨水泥固定,35项研究采用非骨水泥固定,1项研究同时采用了骨水泥和非骨水泥固定。两个固定组治疗后的临床结果均有显著改善。特别是,非骨水泥固定组的再次手术率(分别为12%和22%)和并发症发生率均低于骨水泥固定组(分别为20%和29%)。在这些研究中,非骨水泥单极固定的再次手术率最低(14%),而骨水泥单极固定的再次手术率最高(36%)。关于并发症发生率,非骨水泥双极固定的发生率最低(12%),而骨水泥双极固定的发生率最高(34%)。两组的活动范围和临床结果评分均良好。非骨水泥型桡骨头假体的再次手术率和并发症发生率低于骨水泥型假体。特别是,非骨水泥单极假体的再次手术率可能最低,而非骨水泥双极假体的总体并发症发生率可能最低。