Lin Meng-Ting, Liu I-Chun, Chang Hsien-Po, Wu Chueh-Hung
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, 100, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feng Yuan Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Eur Radiol. 2023 Apr;33(4):2378-2385. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09262-9. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the mobility of the median nerve (MN) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) patients compared to healthy people.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was followed and the electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2022. All published observational studies comparing the excursion of MN between participants with and without CTS were included. The quality of research was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool. The primary outcome was the excursion of the MN under dynamic examination, representing nerve mobility quantified by the standardized mean difference (SMD) for random effect meta-analysis.
Fourteen studies were included in the qualitative review, and twelve entered the meta-analysis involving a total of 375 CTS patients and 296 healthy controls. The forest plot revealed that the mobility of the MN significantly decreased in the CTS group compared to the non-CTS control (SMD = -1.47, 95% CI: -1.91, -1.03, p < 0.001, heterogeneity 82%). In subgroup analysis, both transverse and longitudinal methods for nerve excursion showed less nerve mobility in CTS than in non-CTS.
This meta-analysis showed that the patients with CTS exhibited less mobility of the MN than those without CTS, suggesting MN mobility as a potential CTS marker.
• The patients with CTS revealed less mobility of the median nerve than those without CTS. • The mobility of the median nerve could be regarded as a potential CTS marker.
本系统评价和荟萃分析研究了腕管综合征(CTS)患者与健康人相比正中神经(MN)的活动度。
遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,检索了包括PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆在内的电子数据库,检索截至2022年4月。纳入所有已发表的比较有CTS和无CTS参与者之间MN活动度的观察性研究。研究质量通过纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表工具进行评估。主要结局是动态检查下MN的活动度,通过随机效应荟萃分析的标准化均数差(SMD)量化神经活动度。
定性评价纳入了14项研究,12项进入荟萃分析,共涉及375例CTS患者和296例健康对照。森林图显示,与非CTS对照组相比,CTS组MN的活动度显著降低(SMD = -1.47,95%CI:-1.91,-1.03,p < 0.001,异质性82%)。亚组分析中,神经活动度的横向和纵向方法均显示CTS患者的神经活动度低于非CTS患者。
该荟萃分析表明,CTS患者的MN活动度低于非CTS患者,提示MN活动度可能是CTS的一个潜在标志物。
• CTS患者的正中神经活动度低于非CTS患者。• 正中神经活动度可被视为CTS的潜在标志物。