• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非自愿失业背景下国际疾病分类第11版适应障碍的12个月病程

The 12-Month Course of ICD-11 Adjustment Disorder in the Context of Involuntary Job Loss.

作者信息

Lorenz Louisa, Maercker Andreas, Bachem Rahel

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Eur. 2020 Sep 30;2(3):e3027. doi: 10.32872/cpe.v2i3.3027. eCollection 2020 Sep.

DOI:10.32872/cpe.v2i3.3027
PMID:36398147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9645479/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

After its redefinition in ICD-11, adjustment disorder (AjD) comprises two core symptom clusters of preoccupations and failure to adapt to the stressor. Only a few studies investigate the course of AjD over time and the definition of six months until the remission of the disorder is based on little to no empirical evidence. The aim of the present study was to investigate the course of AjD symptoms and symptom clusters over time and to longitudinally evaluate predictors of AjD symptom severity.

METHOD

A selective sample of the Zurich Adjustment Disorder Study, N = 105 individuals who experienced involuntary job loss and reported either high or low symptom severity at first assessment (t1), were assessed M = 3.4 (SD = 2.1) months after the last day at work, and followed up six (t2) and twelve months (t3) later. They completed a fully structured diagnostic interview for AjD and self-report questionnaires.

RESULTS

The prevalence of AjD was 21.9% at t1, 6.7% at t2, and dropped to 2.9% at t3. All individual symptoms and symptom clusters showed declines in prevalence rates across the three assessments. A hierarchical regression analysis of symptoms at t3 revealed that more symptoms at the first assessment (β = 0.32, p = .002) and the number of new life events between the first assessment and t3 (β = 0.29, p = .004) significantly predicted the number of AjD symptoms at t3.

CONCLUSION

Although prevalence rates of AjD declined over time, a significant proportion of individuals still experienced AjD symptoms after six months. Future research should focus on the specific mechanisms underlying the course of AjD.

摘要

背景

在《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)对其重新定义后,适应障碍(AjD)包含两个核心症状群,即过度担忧和无法适应应激源。仅有少数研究调查了适应障碍随时间的病程,且关于该障碍缓解前六个月的定义几乎没有实证依据。本研究的目的是调查适应障碍症状及症状群随时间的病程,并纵向评估适应障碍症状严重程度的预测因素。

方法

苏黎世适应障碍研究的一个选择性样本,N = 105名经历非自愿失业且在首次评估(t1)时报告症状严重程度高或低的个体,在工作的最后一天后平均M = 3.4(标准差 = 2.1)个月进行评估,并在六个月后(t2)和十二个月后(t3)进行随访。他们完成了一份针对适应障碍的完全结构化诊断访谈和自我报告问卷。

结果

适应障碍的患病率在t1时为21.9%,在t2时为6.7%,在t3时降至2.9%。所有个体症状及症状群在三次评估中的患病率均呈下降趋势。对t3时症状的分层回归分析显示,首次评估时更多的症状(β = 0.32,p = .002)以及首次评估与t3之间新发生生活事件的数量(β = 0.29,p = .004)显著预测了t3时适应障碍症状的数量。

结论

尽管适应障碍的患病率随时间下降,但仍有相当比例的个体在六个月后仍经历适应障碍症状。未来的研究应关注适应障碍病程背后的具体机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8da2/9645479/6c705c6e7ac8/cpe-02-3027-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8da2/9645479/efd8e98b9c83/cpe-02-3027-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8da2/9645479/6c705c6e7ac8/cpe-02-3027-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8da2/9645479/efd8e98b9c83/cpe-02-3027-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8da2/9645479/6c705c6e7ac8/cpe-02-3027-g02.jpg

相似文献

1
The 12-Month Course of ICD-11 Adjustment Disorder in the Context of Involuntary Job Loss.非自愿失业背景下国际疾病分类第11版适应障碍的12个月病程
Clin Psychol Eur. 2020 Sep 30;2(3):e3027. doi: 10.32872/cpe.v2i3.3027. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
A socio-interpersonal approach to adjustment disorder: the example of involuntary job loss.一种针对适应障碍的社会人际方法:以非自愿失业为例。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Jan 31;9(1):1425576. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2018.1425576. eCollection 2018.
3
Prevalence and correlates of ICD-11 adjustment disorder: Findings from the Zurich Adjustment Disorder Study.国际疾病分类第11版适应障碍的患病率及其相关因素:苏黎世适应障碍研究的结果
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018 Sep-Dec;18(3):209-217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
4
Exploring Characteristics of Preoccupation and Failure to Adapt Among Patients Suffering From Adjustment Disorder: A Qualitative Study.探索适应障碍患者的先占观念和适应失败特征:一项定性研究。
Clin Psychol Eur. 2024 Jun 28;6(2):e11565. doi: 10.32872/cpe.11565. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
A scoping review of ICD-11 adjustment disorder research.对国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)适应障碍研究的范围综述。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Jan 18;8(sup7):1421819. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1421819. eCollection 2017.
6
Adjustment disorders: prevalence in a representative nationwide survey in Germany.适应障碍:德国一项具有代表性的全国性调查中的患病率。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;47(11):1745-52. doi: 10.1007/s00127-012-0493-x. Epub 2012 Mar 11.
7
Measuring ICD-11 adjustment disorder: the development and initial validation of the International Adjustment Disorder Questionnaire.测量 ICD-11 适应障碍:国际适应障碍问卷的编制及初步验证。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Mar;141(3):265-274. doi: 10.1111/acps.13126. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
8
Is adjustment disorder unidimensional or multidimensional? Implications for ICD-11.适应障碍是单维的还是多维的?对 ICD-11 的影响。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Mar;27(1). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1591. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
9
The network structure of ICD-11 adjustment disorder: A comparison of clinical and nonclinical samples.ICD-11 调整障碍的网络结构:临床与非临床样本的比较。
Eur Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 29;65(1):e43. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2303.
10
Adjustment disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depressive disorders in old age: findings from a community survey.老年期的适应障碍、创伤后应激障碍及抑郁障碍:一项社区调查的结果
Compr Psychiatry. 2008 Mar-Apr;49(2):113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.07.002. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Spanish version of the Adjustment Disorder New Module-20 (ADNM-20) in a non-clinical sample.非临床样本中《适应障碍新模块-20》(ADNM-20)西班牙语版本的验证
BMC Psychol. 2024 Dec 21;12(1):771. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02298-0.
2
Grief reactions, depression, and anxiety following job loss: patterns and correlates.失业后的悲伤反应、抑郁和焦虑:模式及其相关因素。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021;12(1):1905348. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1905348.
3
Exhaustion disorder: scoping review of research on a recently introduced stress-related diagnosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and Validity of a German Standardized Diagnostic Interview Module for ICD-11 Adjustment Disorder.《ICD-11 调整障碍的德国标准化诊断访谈模块的信度和效度》
J Trauma Stress. 2021 Apr;34(2):275-286. doi: 10.1002/jts.22597. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
ICD-11 Adjustment Disorder among Organ Transplant Patients and Their Relatives.器官移植患者及其亲属的 ICD-11 适应障碍。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 21;16(17):3030. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173030.
3
Prevalence and correlates of ICD-11 adjustment disorder: Findings from the Zurich Adjustment Disorder Study.
衰竭障碍:对一种新引入的与压力相关诊断的研究的范围综述
BJPsych Open. 2022 Aug 24;8(5):e159. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.559.
国际疾病分类第11版适应障碍的患病率及其相关因素:苏黎世适应障碍研究的结果
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018 Sep-Dec;18(3):209-217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
4
A socio-interpersonal approach to adjustment disorder: the example of involuntary job loss.一种针对适应障碍的社会人际方法:以非自愿失业为例。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Jan 31;9(1):1425576. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2018.1425576. eCollection 2018.
5
Internet-Based Self-Help Intervention for ICD-11 Adjustment Disorder: Preliminary Findings.基于互联网的 ICD-11 适应障碍自助干预:初步研究结果。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Jun;89(2):451-460. doi: 10.1007/s11126-017-9547-2.
6
Adjustment disorder: A diagnosis whose time has come.适应障碍:是时候做出这个诊断了。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:243-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.034. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
7
Is adjustment disorder unidimensional or multidimensional? Implications for ICD-11.适应障碍是单维的还是多维的?对 ICD-11 的影响。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Mar;27(1). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1591. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
8
Prevalence and predictors of post-stroke mood disorders: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of depression, anxiety and adjustment disorder.卒中后心境障碍的患病率及其预测因素:抑郁、焦虑和适应障碍的荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;47:48-60. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
9
Evaluation of the revised Sense of Coherence scale in a sample of older adults: A means to assess resilience aspects.评估修订后的感知控制量表在老年人群体中的应用:评估适应力方面的一种手段。
Aging Ment Health. 2018 Nov;22(11):1438-1447. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1364348. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
10
Adjustment disorder: Prevalence, sociodemographic risk factors, and its subtypes in outpatient psychiatric clinic.适应障碍:门诊精神科的患病率、社会人口学危险因素及其亚型。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2017 Aug;28:82-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Mar 16.