Department of Environment and Genetics, and Centre for Future Landscapes, School of Agriculture, Biomedicine, and Environment, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ecol Appl. 2023 Mar;33(2):e2779. doi: 10.1002/eap.2779. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
Restoration of degraded areas is now a central tool in humanity's response to continued species-loss. However, restoration projects often report exceedingly slow or failed recolonization of fauna, especially dispersal-constrained groups such as invertebrates. Active interventions via reintroducing or "rewilding" invertebrates may assist recolonization and speed up restoration of communities toward a desired target. However, invertebrate rewilding is rarely implemented during ecological restoration. Here, we studied the efficacy of invertebrate rewilding as a means of reintroducing dispersal-constrained species and improving diversity and compositional similarities to remnant communities during restoration. Rewilding was conducted by transplanting leaf litter and soil, including associated communities of invertebrates from species rich remnant sites into species poor, and geographically isolated, revegetated farmland sites. We sampled pre- and post-rewilding invertebrate communities in remnant, rewilded revegetation, and control revegetation sites. We analyzed morphospecies richness, abundance, community composition, and modeled morphospecies traits (dispersal method/trophic guild) using a Hierarchical Modelling of Species Communities approach to determine which biological properties facilitated establishment. Beetle (Coleoptera) morphospecies richness increased rapidly in rewilded sites and was indistinguishable from remnant communities as early as 7 months post-rewilding. Beetle community similarity in the rewilding sites significantly deviated from the control sites 27 months post-rewilding, however remnant communities remained distinct over the study timeframe. Establishment success varied as other taxa did not respond as consistently as beetles within the study timeframe. Furthermore, there were no discernible shifts in dispersal traits in rewilded sites. However, predatory morphospecies were more likely to establish post-rewilding than other trophic groups. Our results demonstrate that the relatively simple act of transplanting leaf litter can result in comparatively large increases in morphospecies richness during restoration in a short timeframe. We advocate methodologies such as ours should be adopted more frequently to address failed community restoration as they are cost-effective and can be easily applied by practitioners in various restoration settings. However, further efficacy tests (e.g., varying the number of rewilding events) and longer study timeframes are needed to ensure effectiveness for a broader range of invertebrate taxa and ecosystems.
恢复退化区域现在是人类应对物种持续丧失的核心工具。然而,恢复项目经常报告动物群的再殖民化极其缓慢或失败,特别是扩散受限的群体,如无脊椎动物。通过重新引入或“重新野化”无脊椎动物进行积极干预可能有助于再殖民化,并加速社区向目标恢复。然而,无脊椎动物的重新野化在生态恢复中很少实施。在这里,我们研究了无脊椎动物重新野化作为一种引入扩散受限物种的手段的功效,并在恢复过程中提高多样性和与残余群落的组成相似性。通过从物种丰富的残余地点移植落叶和土壤,包括相关的无脊椎动物群落,将其转移到物种贫乏且地理位置隔离的重新植被化农田地点,进行重新野化。我们在残余、重新野化的植被和对照植被地点采样了重新野化前后的无脊椎动物群落。我们使用物种群落的分层模型分析了形态种丰富度、丰度、群落组成以及形态种特征(扩散方法/营养群),以确定哪些生物特性有助于建立。甲虫(鞘翅目)形态种丰富度在重新野化的地点迅速增加,早在重新野化后 7 个月就与残余群落无法区分。重新野化地点的甲虫群落相似性在重新野化后 27 个月与对照地点显著不同,但残余群落在研究期间仍然存在明显差异。建立成功率因其他类群在研究时间范围内的反应不如甲虫一致而有所不同。此外,重新野化地点的扩散特征没有明显变化。然而,捕食性形态种比其他营养组更有可能在重新野化后建立。我们的结果表明,在相对较短的时间内,在恢复过程中,移植落叶的相对简单行为可以导致形态种丰富度的相对较大增加。我们主张更频繁地采用我们这样的方法来解决失败的社区恢复问题,因为它们具有成本效益,并且可以由各种恢复环境中的从业者轻松应用。然而,需要进一步的功效测试(例如,改变重新野化事件的数量)和更长的研究时间框架,以确保对更广泛的无脊椎动物类群和生态系统的有效性。