Contos Peter, Murphy Nicholas P, Kayll Zachary J, Morgan Tamara, Vido Joshua J, Decker Orsi, Gibb Heloise
Department of Environment and Genetics, Centre for Future Landscapes, School of Agriculture, Biomedicine, and Environment La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Department of Microbiology, Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Agriculture, Biomedicine, and Environment La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 10;14(3):e11128. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11128. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Habitat degradation and associated reductions in ecosystem functions can be reversed by reintroducing or 'rewilding' keystone species. Rewilding projects have historically targeted restoration of processes such as grazing regimes or top-down predation effects. Few projects focus on restoring decomposition efficiency, despite the pivotal role decomposition plays in global carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling. Here, we tested whether rewilding entire communities of detritivorous invertebrates and fungi can improve litter decomposition efficiency and restore detritivore communities during ecological restoration. Rewilding was conducted by transplanting leaf litter and soil, including associated invertebrate and fungal communities from species-rich remnant sites into species-poor, and geographically isolated, revegetated farmland sites in a temperate woodland region of southeastern Australia. We compared communities in sites under the following treatments: remnant (conservation area and source of litter transplant), rewilded revegetation (revegetated farmland site with litter transplant) and control revegetation (revegetated site, no transplant). In one 'before' and three 'after' sampling periods, we measured litter decomposition and the abundance and diversity of detritivorous invertebrates and fungi. We quantified the effect of detritivores on the rate of litter decomposition using piecewise Structural Equation Modelling. Decomposition was significantly faster in rewilding sites than in both control and remnant areas and was largely driven by a greater abundance of invertebrate detritivores. Similarly, the abundance of invertebrate detritivores in rewilding revegetation sites exceeded the level of remnant communities, whereas there was little difference between control and remnant sites. In contrast, rewilding did not increase saprotrophic fungi relative abundance/diversity and there was no strong relationship between decomposition and fungal diversity. Our findings suggest the relatively simple act of transplanting leaf litter and soil can increase functional efficiency during restoration and alter community composition. Our methods may prove important across a range of contexts where other restoration methods have failed to restore ecosystem processes to pre-degradation levels.
通过重新引入或“野化”关键物种,可以扭转栖息地退化以及随之而来的生态系统功能下降的局面。从历史上看,野化项目的目标是恢复诸如放牧制度或自上而下的捕食效应等过程。尽管分解作用在全球碳固存和养分循环中起着关键作用,但很少有项目专注于恢复分解效率。在这里,我们测试了对整个食碎屑无脊椎动物和真菌群落进行野化是否能提高凋落物分解效率,并在生态恢复过程中恢复食碎屑动物群落。野化是通过将落叶和土壤,包括来自物种丰富的残留地的相关无脊椎动物和真菌群落,移植到澳大利亚东南部温带林地地区物种贫乏且地理上隔离的植被恢复农田中来进行的。我们比较了以下处理方式下各地点的群落:残留地(保护区和落叶移植来源地)、野化植被恢复地(有落叶移植的植被恢复农田地)和对照植被恢复地(植被恢复地,无移植)。在一个“之前”和三个“之后”的采样期内,我们测量了凋落物分解以及食碎屑无脊椎动物和真菌的丰度和多样性。我们使用分段结构方程模型量化了食碎屑动物对凋落物分解速率的影响。野化地点的分解速度明显快于对照区和残留区,这在很大程度上是由无脊椎食碎屑动物的丰度较高驱动的。同样,野化植被恢复地中无脊椎食碎屑动物的丰度超过了残留群落的水平,而对照区和残留区之间几乎没有差异。相比之下,野化并没有增加腐生真菌的相对丰度/多样性,并且分解与真菌多样性之间没有很强的关系。我们的研究结果表明,相对简单的落叶和土壤移植行为可以在恢复过程中提高功能效率并改变群落组成。在一系列其他恢复方法未能将生态系统过程恢复到退化前水平的情况下,我们的方法可能被证明是重要的。