Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Section of Critical Care Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jul;30(7):742-759. doi: 10.1111/acem.14629. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
The objective was to conduct a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) to identify best practices, benefits, harms, facilitators, and barriers to the routine collection of sociodemographic variables in emergency departments (EDs).
This work is a systematic review and QES. We conducted a comprehensive search of Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), Cochrane Central (OVID), EMBASE (Ovid), and the multidisciplinary Web of Science Core database using peer-reviewed search strategies, complemented by a gray literature search. We included citations containing perspectives on routine sociodemographic variable collection in EDs and recommendations on definitions or processes of collection or benefits, harms, facilitators, or barriers related to the routine collection of sociodemographic variables in EDs. We conducted this systematic review and QES adhering to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Two reviewers independently selected included studies and extracted data. We conducted a best-fit framework synthesis and paired inductive thematic analysis of the included studies. We generated recommendations based on the QES.
We included 21 unique reports that enrolled 10,454 patients or respondents in our systematic review and QES. Publication dates of included studies ranged from 2011 to 2021. Included citations were published in Australia, Canada, and the United States. We synthesized 11 benefits, 14 potential harms, 15 barriers, and 19 facilitators and identified 14 best practice recommendations from included citations.
Health systems should routinely collect sociodemographic variables in EDs guided by recommendations that minimize harms and maximize benefits and consider relevant barriers and facilitators. Our recommendations can serve as a guide for the equity-focused reformation of emergency medicine health information systems.
本研究旨在进行系统评价和定性证据综合(QES),以确定在急诊科常规收集社会人口统计学变量的最佳实践、益处、危害、促进因素和障碍。
这是一项系统评价和 QES。我们使用同行评审的搜索策略,对 Medline(Ovid)、CINAHL(Ebsco)、Cochrane Central(OVID)、EMBASE(Ovid)和多学科 Web of Science Core 数据库进行了全面搜索,并辅以灰色文献搜索。我们纳入了包含急诊科常规社会人口统计学变量收集观点以及与急诊科常规社会人口统计学变量收集相关的定义或流程建议、益处、危害、促进因素或障碍的文献。我们按照 Joanna Briggs 研究所的指南进行了这项系统评价和 QES。两位评审员独立选择纳入的研究并提取数据。我们对纳入的研究进行了最佳拟合框架综合和归纳主题分析。我们根据 QES 生成了建议。
我们纳入了 21 项独特的报告,其中包括我们的系统评价和 QES 中的 10454 名患者或受访者。纳入研究的发表日期从 2011 年到 2021 年不等。纳入的引文发表在澳大利亚、加拿大和美国。我们综合了 11 项益处、14 项潜在危害、15 项障碍和 19 项促进因素,并从纳入的引文确定了 14 项最佳实践建议。
卫生系统应根据建议在急诊科常规收集社会人口统计学变量,这些建议旨在最大限度地减少危害,最大化益处,并考虑相关的障碍和促进因素。我们的建议可以作为以公平为重点的急诊医学健康信息系统改革的指南。