Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tübingen, Calwerstr 7/6, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Mar;307(3):849-862. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06841-5. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
Conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) imposes an increased risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Technical innovations, such as robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS), may provide ergonomic benefits. We compare the surgeon`s work-related demands of CLS vs RALS for benign hysterectomies.
Five specialists (3 females, 2 males) each performed four RALS and four CLS as part of their daily clinical routine. During the surgical procedures, muscular demands were assessed by bipolar surface electromyograms of the descendent trapezius, extensor digitorum and flexor carpi radialis muscles as well as cardio-vascular demands by electrocardiography, and neck, arm and torso posture by gravimetrical position sensors. Additionally, the subjects rated their level of perceived workload (NASA TLX questionnaire with 6 dimension) and musculoskeletal discomfort (11-point Likert-scale, 0-10).
Muscular demands of the trapezius and flexor carpi radialis muscles were lower with RALS but extensor digitorum demands increased. Cardiovascular demands were about 9 heart beats per minute (bpm) lower for RALS compared to CLS with a rather low median level for both surgical techniques (RALS = 84 bpm; CLS 90 bpm). The posture changed in RALS with an increase in neck and torso flexion, and a reduction in abduction and anteversion position of the right arm. The perceived workload was lower in the physical demands dimension but higher in the mental demands dimension during RALS. Subjective musculoskeletal discomfort was rare during both surgical techniques.
This explorative study identified several potential ergonomic benefits related to RALS which now can be verified by studies using hypothesis testing designs. However, potential effects on muscular demands in the lower arm extensor muscles also have to be addressed in such studies.
传统腹腔镜手术(CLS)会增加与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的风险。技术创新,如机器人辅助腹腔镜手术(RALS),可能会提供人体工程学方面的益处。我们比较了良性子宫切除术的 CLS 与 RALS 对手术医生的工作相关需求。
5 名专家(3 名女性,2 名男性)每人在日常临床工作中分别进行了 4 例 RALS 和 4 例 CLS。在手术过程中,通过双极表面肌电图测量下降的斜方肌、伸指肌和桡侧腕屈肌的肌肉需求,通过心电图测量心血管需求,通过重力位置传感器测量颈部、手臂和躯干姿势。此外,受试者还使用 NASA TLX 问卷(6 个维度)和肌肉骨骼不适(11 点李克特量表,0-10)来评估他们的感知工作负荷水平。
RALS 时斜方肌和桡侧腕屈肌的肌肉需求较低,但伸指肌的需求增加。与 CLS 相比,RALS 的心血管需求低约 9 次/分钟(bpm),两种手术技术的中位数水平都相当低(RALS=84 bpm;CLS 90 bpm)。RALS 时的姿势发生了变化,颈部和躯干前屈增加,右臂外展和前旋减少。RALS 时的体力需求维度的工作负荷较低,但心理需求维度的工作负荷较高。两种手术技术中,主观肌肉骨骼不适都很少见。
这项探索性研究确定了与 RALS 相关的一些潜在的人体工程学益处,这些益处现在可以通过使用假设检验设计的研究来验证。然而,在这些研究中也必须解决对小臂伸肌肌肉需求的潜在影响。