Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术的人体工程学分析

Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures.

作者信息

Zihni Ahmed M, Ohu Ikechukwu, Cavallo Jaime A, Cho Sohyung, Awad Michael M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8109, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA,

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3379-84. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3604-9. Epub 2014 Jun 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Many laparoscopic surgeons report musculoskeletal symptoms that are thought to be related to the ergonomic stress of performing laparoscopy. Robotic surgical systems may address many of these limitations. To date, however, there have been no studies exploring the quantitative ergonomics of robotic surgery. In this study, we sought to compare the activation of bilateral biceps, triceps, deltoid, and trapezius muscle groups during traditional laparoscopic surgery (TLS) and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) procedures, as quantified by surface electromyography (sEMG).

METHODS

One surgeon with expertise in TLS and RALS performed 18 operative procedures (13 TLS, 5 RALS) while sEMG measurements were obtained from bilateral biceps, triceps, deltoid, and trapezius muscles. sEMG measurements were normalized to the maximum voluntary contraction of each muscle (%MVC). We compared mean %MVC values for each muscle group during TLS and RALS with unpaired t-tests and considered differences with a p value <0.05 to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Muscle activation was higher during TLS compared to RALS in bilateral biceps (L Biceps RALS:1.01%MVC, L Biceps TLS:3.14, p = 0.01; R Biceps RALS:1.81%MVC, R Biceps TLS:4.53, p = 0.0002). Muscle activation was higher during TLS compared to RALS in bilateral triceps (L Triceps RALS:1.73%MVC, L Triceps TLS:3.58, p = 0.04; R Triceps RALS:1.59%MVC, R Triceps TLS:5.11, p = 0.02). Muscle activation was higher during TLS compared to RALS in bilateral deltoids (L Deltoid RALS:1.50%MVC, L Deltoid TLS:3.68, p = 0.03; R Deltoid RALS:1.19%MVC, R Deltoid TLS:2.57, p = 0.01). Significant differences were not detected in the bilateral trapezius muscles (L Trapezius RALS:1.50 %MVC, L Trapezius TLS:3.68, p = 0.03; R Trapezius RALS:1.19%MVC, R Trapezius TLS:2.57, p = 0.01).

DISCUSSION

We have quantitatively examined the ergonomics of TLS and RALS and shown that in a single surgeon, TLS procedures are associated with significantly elevated biceps, triceps, and deltoid activation bilaterally when compared to RALS procedures.

摘要

引言

许多腹腔镜外科医生报告了肌肉骨骼症状,这些症状被认为与进行腹腔镜手术时的人体工程学压力有关。机器人手术系统可能会解决其中许多限制。然而,迄今为止,尚未有研究探讨机器人手术的定量人体工程学。在本研究中,我们试图通过表面肌电图(sEMG)量化比较传统腹腔镜手术(TLS)和机器人辅助腹腔镜手术(RALS)过程中双侧肱二头肌、肱三头肌、三角肌和斜方肌肌群的激活情况。

方法

一位精通TLS和RALS的外科医生进行了18台手术(13台TLS,5台RALS),同时从双侧肱二头肌、肱三头肌、三角肌和斜方肌获取sEMG测量值。sEMG测量值被标准化为每块肌肉的最大自主收缩(%MVC)。我们使用非配对t检验比较了TLS和RALS期间每组肌肉的平均%MVC值,并将p值<0.05的差异视为具有统计学意义。

结果

双侧肱二头肌在TLS期间的肌肉激活高于RALS(左肱二头肌RALS:1.)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验