Alrassy Patrick, Smyth Andrew W, Jang Jinwoo
Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatics Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, FL, 33431, USA.
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Jan;179:106879. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106879. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
Large-scale telematics data enable a high-resolution inference of road network's safety conditions and driver behavior. Although many researchers have investigated how to define meaningful safety surrogates and crash predictors from telematics, no comprehensive study analyzes the driver behavior derived from large-scale telematics data and relates them to crash data and the road networks in metropolitan cities. This study extracts driver behavior indices (e.g., speed, speed variation, hard braking rate, and hard acceleration rate) from large-scale telematics data, collected from 4000 vehicles in New York City five boroughs. These indices are compared to collision frequencies and collision rates at the street level. Moderate correlations were found between the safety surrogate measures and collision rates, summarized as follows: (i) When normalizing crash frequencies with traffic volume, using a traffic AADT model, safety-critical regions almost remain the same. (ii) The correlation magnitude of hard braking and hard acceleration varies by road types: hard braking clusters are more indicative of higher collision rates on highways, whereas hard acceleration is a stronger hazard indicator on non-highway urban roads. (iii) Locations with higher travel times coincide with locations of high crash incidence on non-highway roads. (iv) However, speeding on highways is indicative of collision risks. After establishing the spatial correlation between the driver behavior indices and crash data, two prototype safety metrics are proposed: speed corridor maps and hard braking and hard acceleration hot-spots. Overall, this paper shows that data-driven network screening enabled by telematics has great potential to advance our understanding of road safety assessment.
大规模远程信息处理数据能够对道路网络的安全状况和驾驶员行为进行高分辨率推断。尽管许多研究人员已经探讨了如何从远程信息处理中定义有意义的安全替代指标和碰撞预测指标,但尚无全面研究分析从大规模远程信息处理数据中得出的驾驶员行为,并将其与大城市的碰撞数据和道路网络相关联。本研究从纽约市五个行政区的4000辆车辆收集的大规模远程信息处理数据中提取驾驶员行为指标(例如速度、速度变化、急刹车率和急加速率)。将这些指标与街道层面的碰撞频率和碰撞率进行比较。在安全替代指标与碰撞率之间发现了适度的相关性,总结如下:(i)使用交通年平均日交通量(AADT)模型,用交通量对碰撞频率进行归一化时,安全关键区域几乎保持不变。(ii)急刹车和急加速的相关程度因道路类型而异:急刹车聚集区更能表明高速公路上较高的碰撞率,而急加速在非高速公路城市道路上是更强的危险指标。(iii)行程时间较长的地点与非高速公路道路上高碰撞发生率的地点一致。(iv)然而,在高速公路上超速表明存在碰撞风险。在建立驾驶员行为指标与碰撞数据之间的空间相关性之后,提出了两个原型安全指标:速度走廊图以及急刹车和急加速热点图。总体而言,本文表明,由远程信息处理实现的数据驱动型网络筛选在推进我们对道路安全评估的理解方面具有巨大潜力。