• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证机器人辅助手术中的手术工作空间量表。

Validation of a surgical workspace scale during robot-assisted surgery.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2023 Feb;19(1):e2482. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2482. Epub 2022 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1002/rcs.2482
PMID:36403108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10078223/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A sufficient surgical workspace is crucial to avoid complications. Within classic laparoscopy, many subjective surgical rating scales (SRSs) have previously been used to evaluate the surgical workspace. This study aimed to validate a modified version of the 5-point SRS during robot-assisted radical nephrectomy (RARN).

METHODS

Thirty-two intra-operative videos of intraperitoneal spaces were recorded from eight patients who underwent RARN. To attain the visualisation of different types of workspaces, we recorded 20 s panoramic videos of different pneumoperitoneum, namely 3, 5, 7 and 12 mmHg. The videos were randomised and presented two times to eight experienced robotic surgeons to evaluate the workspace using our modified 5-point SRS. Both inter-and intra-rater reliabilities were tested.

RESULTS

The results of the validation study showed moderate inter-rater and good to excellent intra-rater reliability.

CONCLUSION

This is a valid tool that can be confidently used by future researchers in the field of robot-assisted surgery.

摘要

背景

足够的手术空间对于避免并发症至关重要。在传统腹腔镜手术中,先前已经使用了许多主观手术评分量表(SRS)来评估手术空间。本研究旨在验证改良的 5 分 SRS 在机器人辅助根治性肾切除术(RARN)中的有效性。

方法

从接受 RARN 的 8 名患者中记录了 32 个腹膜内空间的术中视频。为了获得不同类型手术空间的可视化效果,我们记录了不同气腹压力(3、5、7 和 12mmHg)下 20 秒的全景视频。视频被随机呈现两次,由 8 名经验丰富的机器人外科医生使用我们改良的 5 分 SRS 对手术空间进行评估。同时测试了组内和组间的可靠性。

结果

验证研究的结果表明,该评分具有中度的组内可靠性和良好到优秀的组间可靠性。

结论

这是一种有效的工具,未来机器人辅助手术领域的研究人员可以自信地使用。

相似文献

1
Validation of a surgical workspace scale during robot-assisted surgery.验证机器人辅助手术中的手术工作空间量表。
Int J Med Robot. 2023 Feb;19(1):e2482. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2482. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
2
Validation of subjective rating scales for assessment of surgical workspace during laparoscopy.腹腔镜手术中手术操作空间评估主观评分量表的验证
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 Nov;61(10):1270-1277. doi: 10.1111/aas.13001.
3
Robot-Assisted Radical Nephrectomy Using the Novel Avatera Robotic Surgical System: A Feasibility Study in a Porcine Model.使用新型阿瓦特拉机器人手术系统进行机器人辅助根治性肾切除术:猪模型的可行性研究
J Endourol. 2023 Mar;37(3):273-278. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0596. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
Development and Validation of an Objective Scoring Tool for Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Scoring for Partial Nephrectomy.机器人辅助部分肾切除术客观评分工具的开发和验证:部分肾切除术评分。
J Endourol. 2022 May;36(5):647-653. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0706. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
5
Contemporary Pure Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: Is the Transition Worth It?当代纯腹腔镜机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性肾切除术:这种转变是否值得?
J Endourol. 2021 Oct;35(10):1526-1532. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0026. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
6
Workspace and dexterity analysis of the hybrid mechanism master robot in Sina robotic telesurgery system: An in vivo experiment.混合机构主机器人在 Sina 机器人远程手术系统中的工作空间和灵巧度分析:一项体内实验。
Int J Med Robot. 2024 Feb;20(1):e2608. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2608.
7
Salvage Robot-assisted Renal Surgery for Local Recurrence After Surgical Resection or Renal Mass Ablation: Classification, Techniques, and Clinical Outcomes.机器人辅助肾部分切除术治疗肾部分切除术后或肾肿瘤消融后局部复发:分类、技术和临床结果。
Eur Urol. 2021 Dec;80(6):730-737. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
8
Preclinical Evaluation of the Versius Surgical System, a New Robot-assisted Surgical Device for Use in Minimal Access Renal and Prostate Surgery.Versius 手术系统的临床前评估,这是一种新的机器人辅助手术设备,用于微创肾和前列腺手术。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Mar;7(2):444-452. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
9
Medico-economic impact of onco-urological robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery in a high-volume centre.高容量中心的肿瘤泌尿机器人辅助微创手术的医学经济学影响。
Int J Med Robot. 2022 Dec;18(6):e2462. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2462. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
10
Current status of robot-assisted surgery in urology: a multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons.泌尿外科机器人辅助手术的现状:对297名泌尿外科医生的多国调查
Can J Urol. 2009 Aug;16(4):4736-41; discussion 4741.

引用本文的文献

1
Anesthesiological and surgical perspectives on using 8 mmHg versus 12 mmHg pneumoperitoneum pressures during robotic radical prostatectomy: Results of a prospective randomized study.在机器人根治性前列腺切除术期间使用 8 mmHg 与 12 mmHg 气腹压力的麻醉学和手术学观点:一项前瞻性随机研究的结果。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Jun;30(6):430-436. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.78617.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of surgical rating scales for the evaluation of surgical working conditions during laparoscopic surgery: a scoping review.使用手术评分量表评估腹腔镜手术中的手术工作条件:范围综述。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):19-25. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6424-5. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
2
Validation of subjective rating scales for assessment of surgical workspace during laparoscopy.腹腔镜手术中手术操作空间评估主观评分量表的验证
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 Nov;61(10):1270-1277. doi: 10.1111/aas.13001.
3
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
4
Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block.中度与深度神经肌肉阻滞患者腹腔镜手术期间手术条件的评估。
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Mar;112(3):498-505. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet377. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
5
Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision.以所需精度估计组内相关系数时的样本量要求。
Stat Med. 2002 May 15;21(9):1331-5. doi: 10.1002/sim.1108.
6
Sample sizes for constructing confidence intervals and testing hypotheses.
Stat Med. 1989 Jul;8(7):803-11. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780080705.