Guseva A L, Doronina O M, Kryukov A I
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Sverzhevsky Research Clinical Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, Moscow, Russia.
Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2022;87(5):12-18. doi: 10.17116/otorino20228705112.
To assess clinical symptoms and rehabilitation of anterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (aBPPV) in comparison to horizontal canal BPPV (hBPPV) and posterior canal BPPV (pBPPV).
The study included 22 patients with aBPPV, 450 patients with pBPPV and 88 patients with hBPPV from total 640 patients with definite BPPV. Rehabilitation of BPPV included different manual repositioning maneuvers. In case of unsuccessful reposition during the visit the patients practiced various home-based repositioning maneuvers and underwent reposition in multipositional mechanical chair. Clinical symptoms and repositioning process in patients with aBPPV were compared to patients with hBPPV and pBPPV, nystagmus was analyzed in aBPPV during the rehabilitation.
ABPPV is a rare type of otolithiasis (3.4% of all BPPVcases). aBPPV typically has no association with middle and inner ear pathology and head trauma. Clinical symptoms in aBPPV are equal to pBPPV and less severe than in hBPPV. In aBPPV cases dominates cupulolithiasis type of canal involvement, which leads to treatment resistance and complex rehabilitation process, which includes repeat visits, multiple repeat maneuvers by specialist, home-based treatment and use of multipositional mechanical chair. Residual dizziness with duration more than a week after successful reposition occurs more often in patients with aBPPV compared to hBPPV and pBPPV cases. In aBPPV cases atypical change of nystagmus could be observed which could be due to canal switch from anterior to posterior canals, primary location of otoliths in common crus of vertical canals or masking chronic otolithiasis of anterior short arm of posterior canal.
与水平半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕(hBPPV)和后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕(pBPPV)相比,评估前半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕(aBPPV)的临床症状及康复情况。
该研究纳入了640例确诊为BPPV的患者,其中22例为aBPPV患者,450例为pBPPV患者,88例为hBPPV患者。BPPV的康复包括不同的手法复位操作。若在就诊时复位未成功,患者需练习各种家庭复位操作,并在多体位机械椅上进行复位。将aBPPV患者的临床症状及复位过程与hBPPV和pBPPV患者进行比较,并在康复过程中对aBPPV患者的眼震进行分析。
aBPPV是耳石症的一种罕见类型(占所有BPPV病例的3.4%)。aBPPV通常与中耳和内耳病变及头部外伤无关。aBPPV的临床症状与pBPPV相同,且比hBPPV轻。在aBPPV病例中,半规管受累以嵴顶结石型为主,这导致治疗抵抗及复杂的康复过程,包括复诊、专科医生多次重复操作、家庭治疗及使用多体位机械椅。与hBPPV和pBPPV病例相比,aBPPV患者在成功复位后更常出现持续超过一周的残余头晕。在aBPPV病例中可观察到不典型的眼震变化,这可能是由于半规管从前半规管向后半规管转换、耳石在垂直半规管总脚的原发性位置或掩盖后半规管前短臂的慢性耳石症所致。