• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症患者对情感性材料的贝叶斯推理

Bayesian reasoning with emotional material in patients with schizophrenia.

作者信息

Romero-Ferreiro Verónica, Susi Rosario, Sánchez-Morla Eva M, Marí-Beffa Paloma, Rodríguez-Gómez Pablo, Amador Julia, Moreno Eva M, Romero Carmen, Martínez-García Natalia, Rodriguez-Jimenez Roberto

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 3;13:827037. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827037. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827037
PMID:36405220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9670539/
Abstract

Delusions are one of the most classical symptoms described in schizophrenia. However, despite delusions are often emotionally charged, they have been investigated using tasks involving non-affective material, such as the Beads task. In this study we compared 30 patients with schizophrenia experiencing delusions with 32 matched controls in their pattern of responses to two versions of the Beads task within a Bayesian framework. The two versions of the Beads task consisted of one emotional and one neutral, both with ratios of beads of 60:40 and 80:20, considered, respectively, as the "difficult" and "easy" variants of the task. Results indicate that patients showed a greater deviation from the normative model, especially in the 60:40 ratio, suggesting that more inaccurate probability estimations are more likely to occur under uncertainty conditions. Additionally, both patients and controls showed a greater deviation in the emotional version of the task, providing evidence of a reasoning bias modulated by the content of the stimuli. Finally, a positive correlation between patients' deviation and delusional symptomatology was found. Impairments in the 60:40 ratio with emotional content was related to the amount of disruption in life caused by delusions. These results contribute to the understanding of how cognitive mechanisms interact with characteristics of the task (i.e., ambiguity and content) in the context of delusional thinking. These findings might be used to inform improved intervention programs in the domain of inferential reasoning.

摘要

妄想是精神分裂症中描述的最典型症状之一。然而,尽管妄想往往带有强烈的情感色彩,但人们一直使用涉及非情感材料的任务(如珠子任务)对其进行研究。在本研究中,我们在贝叶斯框架内,比较了30名患有妄想的精神分裂症患者与32名匹配的对照组在对两种版本珠子任务的反应模式上的差异。珠子任务的两个版本分别包含一个情感版本和一个中性版本,两种版本中珠子的比例均为60:40和80:20,分别被视为该任务的“困难”和“简单”变体。结果表明,患者与规范模型的偏差更大,尤其是在60:40的比例下,这表明在不确定条件下更可能出现更不准确的概率估计。此外,患者和对照组在任务的情感版本中都表现出更大的偏差,这为受刺激内容调节的推理偏差提供了证据。最后,发现患者的偏差与妄想症状之间存在正相关。情感内容的60:40比例下的损伤与妄想对生活造成的干扰程度有关。这些结果有助于理解在妄想思维的背景下认知机制如何与任务特征(即模糊性和内容)相互作用。这些发现可能用于为推理领域改进干预方案提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80bd/9670539/cd8ac6818966/fpsyg-13-827037-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80bd/9670539/cd8ac6818966/fpsyg-13-827037-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80bd/9670539/cd8ac6818966/fpsyg-13-827037-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Bayesian reasoning with emotional material in patients with schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者对情感性材料的贝叶斯推理
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 3;13:827037. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827037. eCollection 2022.
2
Examining reasoning biases in schizophrenia using a modified "Jumping to Conclusions" probabilistic reasoning task.使用改良的“仓促结论”概率推理任务来检查精神分裂症中的推理偏差。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
3
The contribution of hypersalience to the "jumping to conclusions" bias associated with delusions in schizophrenia.超敏度对精神分裂症妄想相关“仓促结论”偏差的贡献。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2010 Jan;35(1):7-17. doi: 10.1503/jpn.090025.
4
Jumping to conclusions and delusions: the impact of discussion of the bias on the bias.草率下结论和妄想:讨论偏见对偏见的影响。
Schizophr Res. 2013 Nov;150(2-3):575-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
5
Problems in measuring the JTC-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial.在使用鱼类任务评估精神病患者 JTC 偏倚时存在的问题:一项随机对照试验基线评估的二次分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02959-5.
6
Reasoning bias and belief conviction in obsessive-compulsive disorder and delusions: jumping to conclusions across disorders?强迫障碍和妄想中推理偏差和信念固执:跨障碍跳跃结论?
Br J Clin Psychol. 2012 Mar;51(1):84-99. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.2011.02014.x. Epub 2011 May 9.
7
Glutamatergic Contribution to Probabilistic Reasoning and Jumping to Conclusions in Schizophrenia: A Double-Blind, Randomized Experimental Trial.谷氨酸能对精神分裂症概率推理和妄下结论的影响:一项双盲、随机实验性试验
Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 1;88(9):687-697. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.03.018. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
8
Healthy people with delusional ideation change their mind with conviction.有妄想观念的健康人会坚定地改变自己的想法。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Oct 30;189(3):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.06.018. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
9
'Jumping to conclusions' and delusions in psychosis: relationship and response to treatment.精神病中的“急于下结论”与妄想:关系及对治疗的反应
Schizophr Res. 2008 Jan;98(1-3):225-31. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.08.021. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
10
Beads task vs. box task: The specificity of the jumping to conclusions bias.珠子任务与盒子任务:草率下结论偏差的特异性
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;56:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.07.017. Epub 2016 Aug 15.

本文引用的文献

1
A distinct inferential mechanism for delusions in schizophrenia.精神分裂症妄想的独特推理机制。
Brain. 2019 Jun 1;142(6):1797-1812. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz051.
2
The relationship between jumping to conclusions and neuropsychological functioning in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中结论推断与神经心理学功能的关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Mar;273:443-449. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.035. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
3
A Bayesian perspective on delusions: Suggestions for modifying two reasoning tasks.关于妄想的贝叶斯观点:修改两项推理任务的建议。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;56:4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
4
Association of the Jumping to Conclusions and Evidence Integration Biases With Delusions in Psychosis: A Detailed Meta-analysis.精神分裂症中妄下结论和证据整合偏差与妄想的关联:一项详细的荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2017 Mar 1;43(2):344-354. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw056.
5
Reasoning in psychosis: risky but not necessarily hasty.精神病中的推理:有风险但未必草率。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2016;21(2):91-106. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2015.1136611. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
6
Psychosis, Delusions and the "Jumping to Conclusions" Reasoning Bias: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.精神病、妄想与“急于下结论”的推理偏差:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Schizophr Bull. 2016 May;42(3):652-65. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv150. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
7
Jumping to Conclusions About the Beads Task? A Meta-analysis of Delusional Ideation and Data-Gathering.对珠子任务草率下结论?关于妄想观念和数据收集的元分析
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Sep;41(5):1183-91. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu187. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
8
Delusion proneness and 'jumping to conclusions': relative and absolute effects.妄想倾向与“急于下结论”:相对效应和绝对效应
Psychol Med. 2015 Apr;45(6):1253-62. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714002359. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
9
Understanding jumping to conclusions in patients with persecutory delusions: working memory and intolerance of uncertainty.理解被害妄想症患者的草率定论:工作记忆与对不确定性的不耐受
Psychol Med. 2014 Oct;44(14):3017-24. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714000592. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
10
Cognitive mechanisms of change in delusions: an experimental investigation targeting reasoning to effect change in paranoia.妄想改变的认知机制:一项针对推理以实现偏执观念改变的实验研究。
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41(2):400-10. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu103. Epub 2014 Jul 21.