Pennisi di Floristella Angela, Chen Xuechen
Department of International Relations, University of Malta, University of Malta, MSD 2080, Msida, Malta.
Faculty of Politics and International Relations, Northeastern University London, Devon House, London, E1W 1LP UK.
Asia Eur J. 2022;20(4):457-475. doi: 10.1007/s10308-022-00652-8. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
Amid rising uncertainty in the global economy and unprecedented economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the concept of supply chain resilience has gained increasing popularity in ASEAN and the EU. However, by comparing their paths to resilient supply chains, this article argues that while both organizations regard resilience as a departure from past doctrines of pure economic efficiency, each has a different understanding of and approach to supply chain resilience. While for ASEAN, supply chain resilience is meant to reconcile inward- and outward-looking dimensions to support ASEAN competitiveness, within the EU, resilience is associated with the search for strategic autonomy with an internal focus. Despite these differences, both groups regard sustainability and digital transformation as crucial components of supply chain resilience, which they see as a way to enhance their economic cooperation and strategic partnership.
在全球经济不确定性上升以及新冠疫情造成前所未有的经济混乱之际，供应链韧性的概念在东盟和欧盟越来越受到关注。然而，通过比较它们构建韧性供应链的路径，本文认为，虽然两个组织都将韧性视为对过去纯粹经济效率学说的背离，但它们对供应链韧性有着不同的理解和方法。对东盟而言，供应链韧性旨在协调内向和外向维度以支持东盟的竞争力，而在欧盟内部，韧性与寻求以内部为重点的战略自主性相关联。尽管存在这些差异，但两个集团都将可持续性和数字转型视为供应链韧性的关键组成部分，并将其视为加强经济合作和战略伙伴关系的一种方式。
