• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格、情绪和情境特征如何影响职场社交互动中的学习

How Personality, Emotions and Situational Characteristics Affect Learning from Social Interactions in the Workplace.

作者信息

Leiß Tamara Vanessa, Rausch Andreas

机构信息

Mannheim Business School (MBS), University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Vocat Learn. 2023;16(1):73-97. doi: 10.1007/s12186-022-09303-w. Epub 2022 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1007/s12186-022-09303-w
PMID:36406797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9647763/
Abstract

The present study examines the effects of social interactions' situational characteristics, emotions, and personality on self-perceived learning from social interactions at work based on diary and survey data. The sample comprises 43 German vocational education and training (VET) trainees in various apprenticeship programs. During the diary period of ten working days, the participants were instructed to record five typical social interactions at work every day. Quantitative data of 1,328 social interactions were analyzed by means of multilevel analysis. Regarding social interactions' characteristics, the analysis revealed the baseline level of instrumentality, an interruption of the social interaction, its instrumentality and questions asked by the trainee during the interaction as positive predictors of self-perceived learning. A trainee's higher speech proportion, however, was a negative predictor. Regarding state emotions, the emotional experiences of bored and motivated were identified as significant positive predictors of learning from social interactions at work. Emotions' baseline level as well as personality traits had no significant influence. The results indicate that social interactions' situational characteristics have the biggest influence on self-perceived learning from social interactions.

摘要

本研究基于日记和调查数据,考察了社交互动的情境特征、情绪和个性对工作中通过社交互动的自我感知学习的影响。样本包括43名参加各种学徒培训项目的德国职业教育培训(VET)学员。在为期十个工作日的日记记录期间,参与者被要求每天记录五次工作中的典型社交互动。通过多层次分析对1328次社交互动的定量数据进行了分析。关于社交互动的特征,分析表明工具性的基线水平、社交互动的中断、其工具性以及学员在互动中提出的问题是自我感知学习的积极预测因素。然而,学员较高的发言比例是一个消极预测因素。关于状态情绪,无聊和积极的情绪体验被确定为工作中通过社交互动学习的显著积极预测因素。情绪的基线水平以及个性特征没有显著影响。结果表明,社交互动的情境特征对通过社交互动的自我感知学习影响最大。

相似文献

1
How Personality, Emotions and Situational Characteristics Affect Learning from Social Interactions in the Workplace.人格、情绪和情境特征如何影响职场社交互动中的学习
Vocat Learn. 2023;16(1):73-97. doi: 10.1007/s12186-022-09303-w. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
2
Trust, power and learning in workplace-based assessment: The trainee perspective.工作场所评估中的信任、权力和学习:学员视角。
Med Educ. 2022 Mar;56(3):280-291. doi: 10.1111/medu.14631. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
3
Pathological personality, situations, and their joint influences on daily emotional symptoms.病态人格、情境及其对日常情绪症状的联合影响。
J Pers. 2022 Jun;90(3):426-440. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12675. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
4
Understanding heterogeneity in borderline personality disorder: differences in affective reactivity explained by the traits of dependency and self-criticism.理解边缘型人格障碍的异质性:依赖和自我批评特质解释了情感反应的差异。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Aug;121(3):680-91. doi: 10.1037/a0028513. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
5
Emotional intelligence and social interaction.情商与社交互动。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Aug;30(8):1018-34. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264762.
6
Self-entrustment: how trainees' self-regulated learning supports participation in the workplace.自主委托:培训生的自我调节学习如何支持其参与工作场所。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Oct;22(4):931-949. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9723-4. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
7
Depressive Symptoms and Their Interactions With Emotions and Personality Traits Over Time: Interaction Networks in a Psychiatric Clinic.抑郁症状及其随时间与情绪和人格特质的相互作用:精神科诊所中的相互作用网络
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2017 Apr 13;19(2). doi: 10.4088/PCC.16m02043.
8
The role of emotions in the development and organization of personality.情绪在人格发展与形成中的作用。
Nebr Symp Motiv. 1988;36:1-56.
9
Big Five Personality Traits Predict Successful Transitions From School to Vocational Education and Training: A Large-Scale Study.大五人格特质预测从学校到职业教育培训的成功过渡:一项大规模研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 31;11:1827. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01827. eCollection 2020.
10
Work-Based Social Interactions, Perceived Stress, and Workload Incongruence as Antecedents of Athletic Trainer Burnout.基于工作的社交互动、感知压力和工作负荷不一致作为运动训练师职业倦怠的前因。
J Athl Train. 2016 Jan;51(1):28-34. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.2.05. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Homecare nurses' length of conversation and intention to remain at the workplace: A multilevel analysis.家庭护理护士的对话时间和留在工作场所的意愿:多层次分析。
J Nurs Manag. 2021 May;29(4):721-730. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13212. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
2
Effects of nurses' personality traits and their environmental characteristics on their workplace learning and nursing competence.护士的个性特质及其环境特征对其工作场所学习和护理能力的影响。
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2018 Apr;15(2):167-180. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12180. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
3
Data with hierarchical structure: impact of intraclass correlation and sample size on type-I error.具有层次结构的数据:组内相关和样本量对I型错误的影响
Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 20;2:74. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00074. eCollection 2011.
4
An experience sampling study of learning, affect, and the demands control support model.一项关于学习、情感与需求控制支持模型的经验取样研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jul;94(4):1003-17. doi: 10.1037/a0015517.
5
Workplace emotions: the role of supervision and leadership.职场情绪:监督与领导的作用
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Sep;92(5):1357-67. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1357.
6
Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue.横断面多层次模型中的预测变量中心化:对一个老问题的新审视。
Psychol Methods. 2007 Jun;12(2):121-38. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.
7
Multilevel models for the experimental psychologist: foundations and illustrative examples.实验心理学家的多层模型:基础与示例
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Feb;39(1):101-17. doi: 10.3758/bf03192848.
8
Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity.将积极主动型人格和大五人格与学习动机及发展活动联系起来。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):927-35. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.927.
9
Conscientiousness, autonomy fit, and development: a longitudinal study.尽责性、自主性契合与发展:一项纵向研究
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):954-63. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.954.
10
Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency.从头开始:系数α与内部一致性介绍
J Pers Assess. 2003 Feb;80(1):99-103. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18.