Mai Shaojun, Zhu Hailan, Li Meijun, Zeng Yanfang, Zhang Yang, Huo Yanchang, Pan Xiong-Fei, Huang Yuli
Department of Cardiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong, China.
Department of Cardiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Jiazi Road 1, Lunjiao Town, Shunde District, Foshan, Guangdong 523808, China.
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 Nov 14;13:20406223221137040. doi: 10.1177/20406223221137040. eCollection 2022.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) has affected millions of adults in the world. It is important to monitor and manage blood pressure (BP) in AF patients. The accuracy of BP monitoring in AF patients with noninvasive methods remains questionable, however.
To compare the accuracy of different noninvasive BP devices (oscillographic sphygmomanometer and pulse wave device) for BP measurement in elderly patients with AF, with a mercury sphygmomanometer as a reference.
This study was an observational study.
Patients with AF from the inpatient department of cardiology were included from 1 January to 31 December 2020. BP measurements were performed by two trained nurses using a tee junction connection on the cuff to connect three sphygmomanometers. The Bland-Altman plot analysis was conducted to compare the agreement of BP measurements. We also compared the agreement of BP measurements through metrics such as accuracy, bias, and precision.
A total of 202 patients (54.5% female) were included. The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed that the lower and upper limits of agreement (LoAs) of pulse wave/reference were similar to the predefined acceptable clinical limits (10/5 mmHg). The bias and precision in both systolic and diastolic BP were significantly less in pulse wave/reference (a bias of 1.8 and 0.77 mmHg and a precision of 5.20 and 4.66 mmHg, respectively), with corresponding higher accuracy readings (98.51% for P10 in systolic BP and 85.64% for P5 in diastolic BP).
A novel noninvasive sphygmomanometer - pulse wave device has a good concordance with a mercury sphygmomanometer in BP monitoring, and may be applicable to perform BP measurements in the elderly with AF.
心房颤动(AF)影响着全球数百万成年人。监测和管理房颤患者的血压(BP)非常重要。然而,采用非侵入性方法监测房颤患者血压的准确性仍存在疑问。
以汞柱式血压计为参照,比较不同非侵入性血压测量设备(示波血压计和脉搏波设备)在老年房颤患者中测量血压的准确性。
本研究为观察性研究。
纳入2020年1月1日至12月31日心内科住院部的房颤患者。由两名经过培训的护士使用三通连接袖带,连接三台血压计进行血压测量。采用Bland-Altman图分析比较血压测量的一致性。我们还通过准确性、偏差和精密度等指标比较了血压测量的一致性。
共纳入202例患者(女性占54.5%)。Bland-Altman图分析显示,脉搏波/参照组的一致性界限(LoA)下限和上限与预先设定的可接受临床界限(10/5 mmHg)相似。脉搏波/参照组收缩压和舒张压的偏差和精密度均显著更低(收缩压偏差分别为1.8和0.77 mmHg,精密度分别为5.20和4.66 mmHg),相应的准确性读数更高(收缩压P10为98.51%,舒张压P5为85.64%)。
一种新型非侵入性血压计——脉搏波设备在血压监测方面与汞柱式血压计具有良好的一致性,可能适用于老年房颤患者的血压测量。