Suppr超能文献

手腕处示波法血压测量与上臂听诊式汞血压计测量的比较。

Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.

作者信息

Rogers P, Burke V, Stroud P, Puddey I B

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1999 May-Jun;26(5-6):477-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.1999.03059.x.

Abstract
  1. Oscillometric devices for blood pressure (BP) measurement at the wrist are becoming more widely used in clinical practice. However, systematic comparisons with standard auscultatory BP measurement at the brachial artery are scarce. Therefore, we compared two such devices, the Boso-Mediwatch (Bosch & Sohn GmbH U. Co., Jungingen, Germany) and the Omron R3 (Omron Corp., Tokyo, Japan), with upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometry. 2. In 20 normotensive subjects and 20 treated hypertensive subjects, the Boso-Mediwatch was applied to the left wrist by observer 1 and was compared with mercury sphygmomanometry of the right upper arm by observer 2. Each observer swapped sides and the procedure was repeated. The Boso-Mediwatch was then applied to the right wrist by observer 1 and was compared with mercury sphygmomanometry of the left upper arm by observer 2. Each observer once again swapped sides and the procedure was repeated. An identical protocol was followed for the Omron R3 in a further 20 treated hypertensive subjects and 20 normotensive subjects. 3. There were no significant differences between observers or left versus right arm for either oscillometric device or when measurements were performed by mercury sphygmomanometry. In normotensive subjects, the Boso-Mediwatch readings were higher than mercury sphygmomanometer readings, with mean differences (95% confidence intervals) of 3.9 (0.1, 7.6; P = 0.045) and 7.0 mmHg (4.7, 9.2; P < 0.001) for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively. In hypertensive subjects, the Boso-Mediwatch readings were lower for systolic BP (mean difference -6.0 mmHg (-11.6, -0.3; P = 0.04) but were higher for diastolic BP (mean difference 3.8 mmHg (1.4, 6.3; P < 0.01). 4. In normotensive subjects, the Omron R3 readings were higher, with mean differences of 3.2 (0.6, 5.8; P = 0.018) and 4.2 mmHg (1.6, 6.7; P = 0.003) for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively. In hypertensive subjects, the Omron R3 readings were lower for both systolic and diastolic BP (mean differences: -5.8 (-8.8, -2.8; P = 0.001) and -5.5 (-9.3, -1.6; P = 0.008), respectively). 5. For the Boso-Mediwatch, weighted least products analysis confirmed the presence of both fixed and proportional error for systolic BP but not for diastolic BP. For the Omron R3, fixed or proportional error was not detected for either systolic or diastolic BP. 6. These wrist oscillometric devices, although offering portability and convenience, give BP measurements that frequently differ substantially (by at least 5 mmHg) from readings simultaneously measured at the upper arm by a mercury sphygmomanometer. The magnitude and direction of differences detected are dependent on both the device used and the underlying level of BP.
摘要
  1. 用于测量手腕血压(BP)的示波法设备在临床实践中应用越来越广泛。然而,与肱动脉标准听诊法测量血压的系统比较却很少见。因此,我们将两种此类设备,即博索-美迪手表(博世与索恩有限责任公司,德国容根根)和欧姆龙R3(欧姆龙公司,日本东京),与上臂听诊式汞柱血压计进行了比较。2. 在20名血压正常的受试者和20名接受治疗的高血压受试者中,观察者1将博索-美迪手表应用于左手腕,并与观察者2测量的右上臂汞柱血压计测量值进行比较。每个观察者交换测量部位并重复该过程。然后观察者1将博索-美迪手表应用于右手腕,并与观察者2测量的左上臂汞柱血压计测量值进行比较。每个观察者再次交换测量部位并重复该过程。另外20名接受治疗的高血压受试者和20名血压正常的受试者对欧姆龙R3遵循相同的方案。3. 对于示波法设备或用汞柱血压计测量时,观察者之间以及左臂与右臂之间均无显著差异。在血压正常的受试者中,博索-美迪手表的读数高于汞柱血压计的读数,收缩压和舒张压的平均差异(95%置信区间)分别为3.9(0.1,7.6;P = 0.045)和7.0 mmHg(4.7,9.2;P < 0.001)。在高血压受试者中,博索-美迪手表的收缩压读数较低(平均差异-6.0 mmHg(-11.6,-0.3;P = 0.04),但舒张压读数较高(平均差异3.8 mmHg(1.4,6.3;P < 0.01)。4. 在血压正常的受试者中,欧姆龙R3的读数较高,收缩压和舒张压的平均差异分别为3.2(0.6,5.8;P = 0.018)和4.2 mmHg(1.6,6.7;P = 0.003)。在高血压受试者中,欧姆龙R3的收缩压和舒张压读数均较低(平均差异分别为-5.8(-8.8,-2.8;P = 0.001)和-5.5(-9.3,-1.6;P = 0.008))。5. 对于博索-美迪手表,加权最小乘积分析证实收缩压存在固定误差和比例误差,但舒张压不存在。对于欧姆龙R3,收缩压或舒张压均未检测到固定误差或比例误差。6. 这些手腕示波法设备虽然具有便携性和便利性,但所测血压与用汞柱血压计同时在上臂测量的读数经常有很大差异(至少相差5 mmHg)。检测到的差异大小和方向取决于所使用的设备以及基础血压水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验