Thomas-Jones Iolo, Kocialkowski Cezary, Dominguez Elizabeth, Williams James
Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, GBR.
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, GBR.
Cureus. 2022 Oct 18;14(10):e30413. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30413. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Introduction The virtual fracture clinic (VFC) can be an effective means of managing specific musculoskeletal injuries, including through protocol-driven direct discharge from the emergency department (ED) or minor injury unit (MIU). This study aimed to measure the efficiency of the VFC triage process while quantifying patient satisfaction after direct discharge from the VFC without routine face-to-face review. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database to ascertain VFC outcomes for 9064 patients from February 2017 to July 2018. We analysed consultant variation in VFC review and the mean time taken per patient. Patient satisfaction was investigated in 100 chronological patients initially managed via the VFC. Results The mean time to triage each patient was 74 seconds, and a mean of 503 patients was triaged each month. The telephone helpline received a mean of 0.9 calls per week. Seventy-seven percent of patients stated they were happy to be managed without a fracture clinic appointment, and 82% of patients received virtual leaflets in the ED or MIU as per protocol. The number of fracture clinic appointments was reduced by 24% as patients were discharged directly or seen instead by allied health professionals. The median patient satisfaction with VFC management was 90%, and the mean satisfaction with VFC communication was 80%. Conclusion Virtual review of fracture clinic referral enables stratification of patients according to clinical urgency and saves patients from attending unnecessary appointments. This is achieved in a patient population generally satisfied with their overall management. Our study results support the growing trend of VFCs as pivotal systems in streamlining the care of musculoskeletal injuries while adhering to British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma guidelines for Fracture Clinic Services.
引言 虚拟骨折诊所(VFC)可以成为管理特定肌肉骨骼损伤的有效手段,包括通过协议驱动的方式从急诊科(ED)或轻伤单元(MIU)直接出院。本研究旨在衡量VFC分诊流程的效率,同时量化VFC直接出院后患者的满意度,且无需常规面对面复查。方法 我们对前瞻性收集的数据库进行回顾性分析,以确定2017年2月至2018年7月9064例患者的VFC结果。我们分析了VFC复查中顾问的差异以及每位患者的平均用时。对最初通过VFC管理的100例按时间顺序排列的患者进行了患者满意度调查。结果 每位患者的平均分诊时间为74秒,每月平均分诊503例患者。电话热线每周平均接到0.9个电话。77%的患者表示很高兴在没有骨折诊所预约的情况下接受管理,82%的患者按照协议在急诊科或轻伤单元收到了虚拟传单。由于患者直接出院或由联合健康专业人员替代诊治,骨折诊所预约数量减少了24%。患者对VFC管理的中位数满意度为90%,对VFC沟通的平均满意度为80%。结论 对骨折诊所转诊进行虚拟评估能够根据临床紧急程度对患者进行分层,并使患者免于参加不必要的预约。这在总体上对其整体管理感到满意的患者群体中得以实现。我们的研究结果支持了VFC作为简化肌肉骨骼损伤护理的关键系统的发展趋势,同时遵循英国骨科协会创伤标准中骨折诊所服务指南。