• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

室间隔穿孔患者预后的影响因素分析:一项单中心回顾性研究。

Analysis of influencing factors for prognosis of patients with ventricular septal perforation: A single-center retrospective study.

作者信息

Duan Ming-Xuan, Zhao Xi, Li Shao-Lin, Tao Jun-Zhong, Li Bo-Yan, Meng Xin-Guo, Dai Dong-Pu, Lu Yan-Yu, Yue Zhen-Zhen, Du Yang, Rui Zi-Ao, Pang Shuo, Zhou Yuan-Hang, Miao Guang-Rui, Bai Lin-Peng, Zhang Qing-Yang, Zhao Xiao-Yan

机构信息

Henan Key Laboratory of Hereditary Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Department of Cardiology, Chest Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 3;9:995275. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.995275. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.995275
PMID:36407434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9668866/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a type of cardiac rupture, usually complicated by acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with a high mortality rate and often poor prognosis. The aim of our study was to investigate the factors influencing the long-term prognosis of patients with VSR from different aspects, comparing the evaluation performance of the Gensini score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and European Heart Surgery Risk Assessment System II (EuroSCORE II) score systems.

METHODS

This study retrospectively enrolled 188 patients with VSR between Dec 9, 2011 and Nov 21, 2021at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. All patients were followed up until Jan 27, 2022 for clinical data, angiographic characteristics, echocardiogram outcomes, intraoperative, postoperative characteristics and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (30-day mortality, cardiac readmission). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to explore the predictors of long-term mortality.

RESULTS

The median age of 188 VSR patients was 66.2 ± 9.1 years and 97 (51.6%) were males, and there were 103 (54.8%) patients in the medication group, 34 (18.1%) patients in the percutaneous transcatheter closure (TCC) group, and 51 (27.1%) patients in the surgical repair group. The average follow-up time was 857.4 days. The long-term mortality of the medically managed group, the percutaneous TCC group, and the surgical repair group was 94.2, 32.4, and 35.3%, respectively. Whether combined with cardiogenic shock (OR 0.023, 95% CI 0.001-0.054, = 0.019), NT-pro BNP level (OR 0.027, 95% CI 0.002-0.34, = 0.005), EuroSCORE II (OR 0.530, 95% CI 0.305-0.918, = 0.024) and therapy group (OR 3.518, 95% CI 1.079-11.463, = 0.037) were independently associated with long-term mortality in patients with VSR, and this seems to be independent of the therapy group. The mortality rate of surgical repair after 2 weeks of VSR was much lower than within 2 weeks ( = 0.025). The cut-off point of EuroSCORE II was determined to be 14, and there were statistically significant differences between the EuroSCORE II < 14 group and EuroSCORE II≥14 group (HR = 0.2596, 95%CI: 0.1800-0.3744, Logrank < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with AMI combined with VSR have a poor prognosis if not treated surgically, surgical repair after 2 weeks of VSR is a better time. In addition, EuroSCORE II can be used as a scoring system to assess the prognosis of patients with VSR.

摘要

背景

室间隔破裂(VSR)是一种心脏破裂类型,通常并发急性心肌梗死(AMI),死亡率高且预后往往较差。本研究的目的是从不同方面探讨影响VSR患者长期预后的因素,比较Gensini评分、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)评分系统的评估性能。

方法

本研究回顾性纳入了2011年12月9日至2021年11月21日在郑州大学第一附属医院的188例VSR患者。对所有患者进行随访至2022年1月27日,收集临床资料、血管造影特征、超声心动图结果、术中、术后特征及主要不良心脏事件(MACEs)(30天死亡率、心脏再入院)。采用Cox比例风险回归分析探讨长期死亡率的预测因素。

结果

188例VSR患者的中位年龄为66.2±9.1岁,男性97例(51.6%),药物治疗组103例(54.8%),经皮导管封堵(TCC)组34例(18.1%),手术修复组51例(27.1%)。平均随访时间为857.4天。药物治疗组、经皮TCC组和手术修复组的长期死亡率分别为94.2%、32.4%和35.3%。是否合并心源性休克(OR 0.023,95%CI 0.001 - 0.054,P = 0.019)、NT - pro BNP水平(OR 0.027,95%CI 0.002 - 0.34,P = 0.005)、EuroSCORE II(OR 0.530,95%CI 0.305 - 0.918,P = 0.024)和治疗组(OR 3.518,95%CI 1.079 - 11.463,P = 0.037)与VSR患者的长期死亡率独立相关,且这似乎与治疗组无关。VSR发生2周后手术修复的死亡率远低于2周内(P = 0.025)。确定EuroSCORE II的截断点为14,EuroSCORE II < 14组和EuroSCORE II≥14组之间存在统计学显著差异(HR = 0.2596,95%CI:0.1800 - 0.3744,Logrank P < 0.001)。

结论

AMI合并VSR患者若不进行手术治疗预后较差,VSR发生2周后进行手术修复是较好时机。此外,EuroSCORE II可作为评估VSR患者预后的评分系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4276/9668866/7d78f1fe236d/fcvm-09-995275-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4276/9668866/d6be366af78a/fcvm-09-995275-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4276/9668866/0dee383a740d/fcvm-09-995275-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4276/9668866/4a443cf238ea/fcvm-09-995275-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4276/9668866/7d78f1fe236d/fcvm-09-995275-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4276/9668866/d6be366af78a/fcvm-09-995275-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4276/9668866/0dee383a740d/fcvm-09-995275-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4276/9668866/4a443cf238ea/fcvm-09-995275-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4276/9668866/7d78f1fe236d/fcvm-09-995275-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of influencing factors for prognosis of patients with ventricular septal perforation: A single-center retrospective study.室间隔穿孔患者预后的影响因素分析:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 3;9:995275. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.995275. eCollection 2022.
2
Clinical Characteristics and Contemporary Prognosis of Ventricular Septal Rupture Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Single-Center Experience.急性心肌梗死并发室间隔破裂的临床特征及当代预后:单中心经验
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 13;8:679148. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.679148. eCollection 2021.
3
Perioperative Risk Assessment for Surgery of Consecutive Cases with Ventricular Septal Rupture: Seeking A Novel and Comprehensive Method.连续室间隔破裂手术的围手术期风险评估:寻求一种新的综合方法。
Heart Surg Forum. 2021 May 24;24(3):E461-E466. doi: 10.1532/hsf.3753.
4
Clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and outcomes of ventricular septal rupture in patients with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者室间隔破裂的临床特征、预后因素及结局
J Investig Med. 2023 Apr;71(4):361-371. doi: 10.1177/10815589221149185. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
5
Perioperative Challenges and Outcome After Surgical Correction of Post-myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture: A Retrospective Single Center Study.心肌梗死后室间隔破裂患者行外科修补术后的围手术期挑战与结局:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2024 Jan 1;27(1):17-23. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_75_23. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
6
Risk factors and outcome analysis after surgical management of ventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective analysis.急性心肌梗死并发室间隔破裂手术治疗后的危险因素及预后分析:一项回顾性分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 May 4;10:66. doi: 10.1186/s13019-015-0265-2.
7
Management and outcome of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture-A Low-Middle-Income Country Experience.心肌梗死后室间隔破裂的处理和结局——来自中低收入国家的经验。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276615. eCollection 2022.
8
Transcatheter closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture.经心肌梗死后室间隔破裂的经导管封堵术。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;6(1):59-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.972711. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
9
Percutaneous closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture - A single centre experience.经皮封堵心肌梗死后室间隔破裂——单中心经验
Indian Heart J. 2017 Apr;69 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S24-S27. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
10
Therapeutic management changes and mortality rates over 30 years in ventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction.30 年来治疗管理的变化与急性心肌梗死后并发室间隔破裂的死亡率。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 1;112(9):1273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative management of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture: a comparison of Impella with intra-aortic balloon pump.心肌梗死后室间隔破裂的围手术期管理:Impella与主动脉内球囊反搏的比较
Heart Vessels. 2025 Jan 26. doi: 10.1007/s00380-025-02513-x.
2
Surgical closure versus transcatheter closure for ventricular septal defect post-infarction: a meta-analysis.心肌梗死后室间隔缺损的外科闭合术与经导管闭合术:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Jul 11;86(9):5276-5282. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002294. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) components with mortality.序贯性器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分与死亡率的相关性。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Jul;66(6):731-741. doi: 10.1111/aas.14067. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
2
The enlargement rate of ventricular septal rupture is a risk factor for 30-day mortality in patients with delayed surgery.
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Dec;9(24):1786. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-6243.
3
Predictive Ability of European Heart Surgery Risk Assessment System II (EuroSCORE II) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Score for in-Hospital and Medium-Term Mortality of Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)和胸外科医师协会(STS)评分对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者院内及中期死亡率的预测能力
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Nov 19;14:8509-8519. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S338819. eCollection 2021.
4
Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture repair: Is it just a matter of the surgical technique?心肌梗死后室间隔破裂修补术:这仅仅是手术技术的问题吗?
J Card Surg. 2022 Mar;37(3):524-525. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16149. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
5
Surgical Treatment of Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Rupture.心肌梗死后室间隔破裂的外科治疗。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128309. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28309.
6
Clinical Characteristics and Contemporary Prognosis of Ventricular Septal Rupture Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Single-Center Experience.急性心肌梗死并发室间隔破裂的临床特征及当代预后:单中心经验
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 13;8:679148. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.679148. eCollection 2021.
7
One-year outcome and survival analysis of deferred ventricular septal repair in cardiogenic shock supported with mechanical circulatory support.机械循环支持支持下心源性休克中行延迟室间隔修复术的 1 年结果和生存分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 18;16(8):e0256377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256377. eCollection 2021.
8
Perioperative Risk Assessment for Surgery of Consecutive Cases with Ventricular Septal Rupture: Seeking A Novel and Comprehensive Method.连续室间隔破裂手术的围手术期风险评估:寻求一种新的综合方法。
Heart Surg Forum. 2021 May 24;24(3):E461-E466. doi: 10.1532/hsf.3753.
9
Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Definitive Treatment in Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture.机械循环支持作为心肌梗死后室间隔破裂的确定性治疗桥接。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 24;14(10):1053-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.046.
10
A new surgical technique for post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture with hemodynamic instability.一种用于治疗心肌梗死后室间隔破裂并伴有血流动力学不稳定的新手术技术。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2021 Apr 7;134(8):981-983. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001442.