• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

序贯性器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分与死亡率的相关性。

Association of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) components with mortality.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.

University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Jul;66(6):731-741. doi: 10.1111/aas.14067. Epub 2022 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1111/aas.14067
PMID:35353902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9322581/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) is a practical method to describe and quantify the presence and severity of organ system dysfunctions and failures. Some proposals suggest that SOFA could be employed as an endpoint in trials. To justify this, all SOFA component scores should reflect organ dysfunctions of comparable severity. We aimed to investigate whether the associations of different SOFA components with in-hospital mortality are comparable.

METHODS

We performed a study based on nationwide register data on adult patients admitted to 26 Finnish intensive care units (ICUs) during 2012-2015. We determined the SOFA score as the maximum score in the first 24 hours after ICU admission. We defined organ failure (OF) as an organ-specific SOFA score of three or higher. We evaluated the association of different SOFA component scores with mortality.

RESULTS

Our study population comprised 63,756 ICU patients. Overall hospital mortality was 10.7%. In-hospital mortality was 22.5% for patients with respiratory failure, 34.8% for those with coagulation failure, 40.1% for those with hepatic failure, 14.9% for those with cardiovascular failure, 26.9% for those with neurologic failure and 34.6% for the patients with renal failure. Among patients with comparable total SOFA scores, the risk of death was lower in patients with cardiovascular OF compared with patients with other OFs.

CONCLUSIONS

All SOFA components are associated with mortality, but their weights are not comparable. High scores of other organ systems mean a higher risk of death than high cardiovascular scores. The scoring of cardiovascular dysfunction needs to be updated.

摘要

背景

序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)是一种描述和量化器官系统功能障碍和衰竭的存在和严重程度的实用方法。一些建议表明,SOFA 可以作为试验的终点。为了证明这一点,所有 SOFA 组成部分的评分都应反映出具有相当严重程度的器官功能障碍。我们旨在研究不同 SOFA 成分与住院死亡率的相关性是否具有可比性。

方法

我们进行了一项基于 2012 年至 2015 年期间在芬兰 26 个重症监护病房(ICU)住院的成年患者的全国性登记数据的研究。我们将 ICU 入住后 24 小时内的最大 SOFA 评分确定为 SOFA 评分。我们将器官衰竭(OF)定义为特定器官的 SOFA 评分为 3 或更高。我们评估了不同 SOFA 成分评分与死亡率的相关性。

结果

我们的研究人群包括 63756 名 ICU 患者。总住院死亡率为 10.7%。呼吸衰竭患者的院内死亡率为 22.5%,凝血功能衰竭患者为 34.8%,肝功能衰竭患者为 40.1%,心血管功能衰竭患者为 14.9%,神经功能衰竭患者为 26.9%,肾功能衰竭患者为 34.6%。在具有可比总 SOFA 评分的患者中,与其他 OF 患者相比,心血管 OF 患者的死亡风险较低。

结论

所有 SOFA 成分都与死亡率相关,但它们的权重并不具有可比性。其他器官系统的高评分意味着死亡风险高于心血管系统的高评分。心血管功能障碍的评分需要更新。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/446dcac2235f/AAS-66-731-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/0326dee2311e/AAS-66-731-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/9bda6b40a37a/AAS-66-731-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/8718f6c68c50/AAS-66-731-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/d69eb0cbd3f5/AAS-66-731-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/2f20f67e2297/AAS-66-731-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/33842bc598ff/AAS-66-731-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/446dcac2235f/AAS-66-731-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/0326dee2311e/AAS-66-731-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/9bda6b40a37a/AAS-66-731-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/8718f6c68c50/AAS-66-731-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/d69eb0cbd3f5/AAS-66-731-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/2f20f67e2297/AAS-66-731-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/33842bc598ff/AAS-66-731-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/242a/9322581/446dcac2235f/AAS-66-731-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) components with mortality.序贯性器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分与死亡率的相关性。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Jul;66(6):731-741. doi: 10.1111/aas.14067. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
2
Describing organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit: a cohort study of 20,000 patients.描述重症监护病房中的器官功能障碍:一项涉及 20000 名患者的队列研究。
Crit Care. 2019 May 23;23(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2459-9.
3
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Component Score Prediction of In-hospital Mortality From Sepsis.序贯器官衰竭评估组件评分预测脓毒症患者住院死亡率。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):810-817. doi: 10.1177/0885066618795400. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
4
Glasgow Coma Scale score dominates the association between admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and 30-day mortality in a mixed intensive care unit population.在混合重症监护病房人群中,格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分在入院序贯器官衰竭评估评分与30天死亡率之间的关联中占主导地位。
J Crit Care. 2014 Oct;29(5):780-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 May 28.
5
The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems of the ESICM.使用最大序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分来量化重症监护中的器官功能障碍/衰竭。一项前瞻性多中心研究的结果。欧洲重症监护医学学会脓毒症相关问题工作组
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Jul;25(7):686-96. doi: 10.1007/s001340050931.
6
Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.使用序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分来评估重症监护病房中器官功能障碍/衰竭的发生率:一项多中心前瞻性研究的结果。欧洲重症监护医学学会“脓毒症相关问题”工作组
Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;26(11):1793-800. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199811000-00016.
7
Validation of prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among cardiac-, thoracic-, and vascular-surgery patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit.入住心胸重症监护病房的心脏、胸科和血管手术患者中,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准及快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分对院内死亡率预后准确性的验证。
J Card Surg. 2020 Jan;35(1):118-127. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14331. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
8
Association Between Levels of Intensive Care and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Hospitalized for Sepsis Stratified by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores.根据序贯器官衰竭评估评分对因败血症住院患者进行分层,比较不同 ICU 治疗水平与住院死亡率之间的关系。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep 1;51(9):1138-1147. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005886. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
9
Reporting SOFA in research: we should always present each of the SOFA subscores.在研究中报告 SOFA 评分时:我们应始终呈现每个 SOFA 分项评分。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2023;55(5):326-329. doi: 10.5114/ait.2023.134188.
10
Evaluation of the SOFA score: a single-center experience of a medical intensive care unit in 303 consecutive patients with predominantly cardiovascular disorders. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的评估:一家医疗重症监护病房对303例主要患有心血管疾病的连续患者的单中心经验。序贯器官衰竭评估。
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Aug;26(8):1037-45. doi: 10.1007/s001340051316.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Performance of SAPS-3, SOFA Score, and Procalcitonin for Hospital Mortality in COVID-19 Viral Sepsis: A Cohort Study.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、降钙素原及简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)-3对新型冠状病毒肺炎病毒脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测性能:一项队列研究
Life (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;15(8):1161. doi: 10.3390/life15081161.
2
Association Between ST-Segment Deviation in Electrocardiography and 30-Day Mortality in Non-Cardiac Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.心电图ST段偏移与非心脏危重症患者30天死亡率的关联:一项回顾性单中心研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 10;14(14):4911. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144911.
3
Innate Immune Response After Cardiac Arrest (INNATUS): A Study Protocol for an Observational Single-Center Pilot Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiovascular SOFA score may not reflect current practice.心血管序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分可能无法反映当前的实际情况。
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jan;48(1):119-120. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06536-6. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
2
Development of the Gastrointestinal Dysfunction Score (GIDS) for critically ill patients - A prospective multicenter observational study (iSOFA study).危重症患者胃肠功能障碍评分(GIDS)的制定——一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究(iSOFA研究)
Clin Nutr. 2021 Aug;40(8):4932-4940. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.07.015. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
3
The early change of SOFA score as a prognostic marker of 28-day sepsis mortality: analysis through a derivation and a validation cohort.
心脏骤停后的先天免疫反应(INNATUS):一项单中心观察性试点研究的研究方案
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Aug;69(7):e70087. doi: 10.1111/aas.70087.
4
Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients with Full Spectrum of COVID-19 Severity and Concomitant Herpesvirus Reactivation.新冠病毒病全谱严重程度及合并疱疹病毒再激活患者的临床特征与转归
Microorganisms. 2025 May 27;13(6):1221. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13061221.
5
The Role of Hematological Parameters in Critically Ill Patients: Mortality Prediction in Elderly Intensive Care Unit Patients.血液学参数在危重症患者中的作用:老年重症监护病房患者的死亡率预测
Cureus. 2025 Apr 13;17(4):e82183. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82183. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Clinical Significance of sp Found in Respiratory Fungal Cultures of ICU Patients.重症监护病房患者呼吸道真菌培养中发现的sp的临床意义
J Intensive Care Med. 2025 Oct;40(10):1089-1095. doi: 10.1177/08850666251340043. Epub 2025 May 13.
7
Observational Study of Microbial Colonization and Infection in Neurological Intensive Care Patients Based on Electronic Health Records.基于电子健康记录的神经重症监护患者微生物定植与感染的观察性研究
Biomedicines. 2025 Apr 2;13(4):858. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13040858.
8
Clinical outcomes and peripheral tissue oxygen saturation monitoring of the knee region by near-infrared spectroscopy in circulatory shock: a prospective observational cohort study.循环性休克中通过近红外光谱法对膝部区域进行临床结局及外周组织氧饱和度监测:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2025 Mar 19;29(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05363-1.
9
Differential impact of TyG and TyG-BMI indices on short- and long-term mortality in critically ill ischemic stroke patients.甘油三酯与血糖指数(TyG)和甘油三酯与血糖指数-体重指数(TyG-BMI)对重症缺血性中风患者短期和长期死亡率的差异影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):754. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04450-5.
10
An optimal antibiotic selection framework for Sepsis patients using Artificial Intelligence.一种使用人工智能的脓毒症患者最佳抗生素选择框架。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Nov 29;7(1):343. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01350-y.
序贯器官衰竭评估评分早期变化作为 28 天脓毒症死亡率的预后标志物:通过推导和验证队列进行的分析。
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 29;23(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2665-5.
4
The SOFA score-development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials.SOFA 评分的发展、在临床试验中准确评估的效用和挑战。
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 27;23(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2663-7.
5
Which Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trials in Critical Care Medicine Have Shown Reduced Mortality? A Systematic Review.哪些重症监护医学多中心随机对照试验显示降低了死亡率?系统评价。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec;47(12):1680-1691. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004000.
6
Temporal Trends and Clinical Outcomes Associated with Vasopressor and Inotrope Use in The Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.血管加压素和儿茶酚胺类药物在心脏重症监护病房的使用与时间趋势和临床结果的关系。
Shock. 2020 Apr;53(4):452-459. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001390.
7
Predictive value of individual Sequential Organ Failure Assessment sub-scores for mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit.序贯性器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对心脏重症监护病房患者死亡率的预测价值。
PLoS One. 2019 May 20;14(5):e0216177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216177. eCollection 2019.
8
Association of extracerebral organ failure with 1-year survival and healthcare-associated costs after cardiac arrest: an observational database study.心搏骤停后体外器官衰竭与 1 年生存率和医疗保健相关成本的关系:一项观察性数据库研究。
Crit Care. 2019 Feb 28;23(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2359-z.
9
Current use of vasopressors in septic shock.血管活性药物在感染性休克中的当前应用。
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0498-7.
10
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Intra-Abdominal Hypertension in Critically Ill Patients-A Prospective Multicenter Study (IROI Study).危重症患者腹腔内高压的发生率、风险因素和结局:一项前瞻性多中心研究(IROI 研究)。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr;47(4):535-542. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003623.