Suppr超能文献

欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)和胸外科医师协会(STS)评分对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者院内及中期死亡率的预测能力

Predictive Ability of European Heart Surgery Risk Assessment System II (EuroSCORE II) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Score for in-Hospital and Medium-Term Mortality of Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

作者信息

Gao Fei, Shan Lingtong, Wang Chong, Meng Xiaoqi, Chen Jiapeng, Han Lixiang, Zhang Yangyang, Li Zhi

机构信息

Cardiovascular Department, Huaiyin Hospital of Huai'an City, Huai'an, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sheyang County People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Gen Med. 2021 Nov 19;14:8509-8519. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S338819. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the powers of European Heart Surgery Risk Assessment System II (EuroSCORE II) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score in predicting in-hospital and medium-term mortality of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

Totally 1628 Chinese patients were included between January 2000 and January 2018. Their perioperative clinical data were collected and the patients were closely followed up. According to the length of follow-up time, the total cohort was divided into 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year and 5-year groups. The in-hospital and medium-term risk prediction of EuroSCORE II and STS score were comparatively assessed by calibration, discrimination, decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

About 36 (2.21%) patients died during hospitalization. Both EuroSCORE II and STS score performed extremely well in predicting in-hospital mortality (area under curve = 0.900 and 0.879, respectively). However, calibration and discrimination analyses showed gradual decrease when these two risk evaluation systems were used to predict mortality during the follow-up period. At the same time, the predictive ability of EuroSCORE II was better than STS score. DCA curves showed that the performances of the two evaluation systems were roughly equal between the threshold probability of 0% to 20%. The percentage of correct reclassification of EuroSCORE II was 21.64% higher than that of STS score in predicting 2-year postoperative mortality. The IDI index showed that the predictive capabilities of these two systems were roughly equivalent. Bland-Altman analysis showed no significant difference between the values of the two systems.

CONCLUSION

EuroSCORE II and STS score have excellent predictive powers in predicting in-hospital mortality of patients undergoing CABG. In particular, EuroSCORE II is superior in calibration and discrimination. The prediction efficiency of the two risk evaluation systems is still acceptable for two-year postoperative mortality, but decreases year by year.

摘要

目的

评估欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)和胸外科医师协会(STS)评分预测冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者住院期间及中期死亡率的能力。

方法

纳入2000年1月至2018年1月期间的1628例中国患者。收集其围手术期临床资料,并对患者进行密切随访。根据随访时间长短,将整个队列分为1年、2年、3年、4年和5年组。通过校准、区分度、决策曲线分析(DCA)、净重新分类指数(NRI)、综合区分度改善(IDI)和Bland-Altman分析,对EuroSCORE II和STS评分的住院及中期风险预测进行比较评估。

结果

约36例(2.21%)患者在住院期间死亡。EuroSCORE II和STS评分在预测住院死亡率方面均表现出色(曲线下面积分别为0.900和0.879)。然而,在校准和区分度分析中,当使用这两种风险评估系统预测随访期间的死亡率时,其性能逐渐下降。同时,EuroSCORE II的预测能力优于STS评分。DCA曲线显示,在阈值概率为0%至20%之间,两种评估系统的性能大致相当。在预测术后2年死亡率方面,EuroSCORE II的正确重新分类百分比比STS评分高21.64%。IDI指数显示,这两种系统的预测能力大致相当。Bland-Altman分析显示,两种系统的值之间无显著差异。

结论

EuroSCORE II和STS评分在预测CABG患者住院死亡率方面具有出色的预测能力。特别是,EuroSCORE II在校准和区分度方面更具优势。两种风险评估系统对术后2年死亡率的预测效率仍可接受,但逐年下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ba6/8610380/05af4c63697e/IJGM-14-8509-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验