Suppr超能文献

马歇尔韧带术中电生理定位的优化

Optimization of intra-operative electrophysiological localization of the ligament of Marshall.

作者信息

Langmuur Sanne J J, Taverne Yannick J H J, van Schie Mathijs S, Bogers Ad J J C, de Groot Natasja M S

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 3;9:1030064. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1030064. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ligament of Marshall (LOM) may play a role in the pathophysiology of several tachyarrhythmias and accurate electrophysiological localization of this structure is crucial for effective ablation therapy. This study therefore quantifies electrophysiological properties of the LOM, and identifies which electrogram (EGM) recording (uni- or bipolar) and processing technologies [local activation time (LAT) and/or voltage mapping] are most suitable for accurate localization of the LOM.

METHODS

The LOM was electrophysiologically identified in 19 patients (mean age 66 ± 14 years; 12 male) undergoing elective cardiac surgery using intra-operative high-density epicardial mapping, to quantify and visualize EGM features during sinus rhythm.

RESULTS

Only a third of LOM potentials that were visualized using unipolar EGMs, were still visible in bipolar activation maps. Unipolar LOM potentials had lower voltages (P50: LOM: 1.51 (0.42-4.29) mV vs. left atrium (LA): 8.34 (1.50-17.91) mV, < 0.001), less steep slopes (P50: LOM: -0.48 (-1.96 to -0.17) V/s vs. LA: -1.24 (-2.59 to -0.21) V/s, < 0.001), and prolonged activation duration (LOM: 20 (7.5-30.5) ms vs. LA: 16.5 (6-28) ms, = 0.008) compared to LA potentials. Likewise, bipolar LOM voltages were also smaller (P50: LOM: 1.54 (0.48-3.28) mV vs. LA: 3.12 (0.50-7.19) mV, < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The LOM was most accurately localized in activation and voltage maps by using unipolar EGMs with annotation of primary deflections in case of single potentials and secondary deflections in case of double or fractionated potentials.

摘要

背景

马歇尔韧带(LOM)可能在多种快速性心律失常的病理生理过程中发挥作用,准确对该结构进行电生理定位对于有效的消融治疗至关重要。因此,本研究对LOM的电生理特性进行量化,并确定哪种心电图(EGM)记录方式(单极或双极)和处理技术[局部激动时间(LAT)和/或电压标测]最适合于LOM的准确定位。

方法

在19例接受择期心脏手术的患者(平均年龄66±14岁;12例男性)中,通过术中高密度心外膜标测从电生理角度识别LOM,以量化和可视化窦性心律期间的EGM特征。

结果

使用单极EGM可视化的LOM电位中,只有三分之一在双极激动图中仍可见。与左心房(LA)电位相比,单极LOM电位的电压较低(P50:LOM:1.51(0.42 - 4.29)mV vs. LA:8.3(1.50 - 17.91)mV,<0.001),斜率较平缓(P50:LOM: - 0.48( - 1.96至 - 0.17)V/s vs. LA: - 1.24( - 2.59至 - 0.21)V/s,<0.001),激动持续时间延长(LOM:20(7.5 - 30.5)ms vs. LA:16.5(6 - 28)ms,=0.008)。同样,双极LOM电压也较小(P50:LOM:1.54(0.48 - 3.28)mV vs. LA:3.12(0.50 - 7.19)mV,<0.001)。

结论

通过使用单极EGM,在单电位情况下标注主要偏转,在双电位或碎裂电位情况下标注次要偏转,可在激动图和电压图中最准确地定位LOM。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b29/9669368/3c8ea6c50ccf/fcvm-09-1030064-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验