• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回旋支开口处生物可吸收支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 4 年结果。

Four-Year Outcomes of Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with a Bioresorbable Scaffold in the Circumflex Ostium.

机构信息

University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.

Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Oct 31;2022:7934868. doi: 10.1155/2022/7934868. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/7934868
PMID:36407753
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9640231/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of a double stent scaffold strategy in patients with left main (LM) bifurcation lesions involving the ostium of the left circumflex artery (LCX), utilizing a drug-eluting stent (DES) in the LM extending into the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) in the LCX ostium.

BACKGROUND

The high occurrence of in-stent restenosis of the LCX ostium is the major limitation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for LM lesions with a two-stent strategy.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective, single-arm study of 46 consecutively enrolled patients with a stable coronary artery disease and significant unprotected LM distal bifurcation disease. Patients underwent imaging-guided PCI using DES in the LM-LAD and BVS in the LCX using a T-stent or mini-crush technique. The primary outcome at four years was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and target lesion revascularization (TLR).

RESULTS

At four years, the primary outcome was identified in 9 patients (19.6%). All events were TLRs except one myocardial infarction due to BVS thrombosis. Seven of the eight TLRs were a result of side branch BVS restenosis. Univariate predictors of the 4-year outcome were higher LDL cholesterol and BVS size ≤2.5 mm. On multivariate analysis, LCX lesion preparation with a cutting balloon and post-procedure use of intravascular ultrasound for optimization were found to be independent protective factors of MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients with LM distal bifurcation disease, an imaging-guided double stent scaffold strategy with DES in the LM and BVS in the LCX ostium was technically successful in all patients and was reasonably safe and effective for four years.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨在左主干(LM)分叉病变累及回旋支(LCX)开口的患者中,采用药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗 LM 并延伸至左前降支(LAD)和生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)治疗 LCX 开口的双支架支架策略的长期结果。

背景

LCX 开口处支架内再狭窄的高发生率是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗双支架策略的 LM 病变的主要局限性。

方法

这是一项单中心、前瞻性、单臂研究,共纳入 46 例连续入选的稳定型冠心病和明显无保护的 LM 远端分叉病变患者。患者接受了影像学引导的 PCI,在 LM-LAD 中使用 DES,在 LCX 中使用 T 支架或迷你挤压技术使用 BVS。四年时的主要结局是死亡、心肌梗死、卒中和靶病变血运重建(TLR)的复合事件。

结果

四年时,9 例患者(19.6%)出现主要结局。所有事件均为 TLR,除 1 例因 BVS 血栓形成导致的心肌梗死。8 例 TLR 中有 7 例是由于边支 BVS 再狭窄引起的。4 年预后的单因素预测因素包括较高的 LDL 胆固醇和 BVS 直径≤2.5mm。多因素分析发现,采用切割球囊进行 LCX 病变准备和术后使用血管内超声进行优化是 MACE 的独立保护因素。

结论

在有 LM 远端分叉病变的选定患者中,采用 DES 治疗 LM 和 BVS 治疗 LCX 开口的影像学引导的双支架支架策略在所有患者中均取得了技术成功,并且在四年内具有合理的安全性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8566/9640231/1968cf9a8f69/JITC2022-7934868.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8566/9640231/1968cf9a8f69/JITC2022-7934868.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8566/9640231/1968cf9a8f69/JITC2022-7934868.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Four-Year Outcomes of Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with a Bioresorbable Scaffold in the Circumflex Ostium.回旋支开口处生物可吸收支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 4 年结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Oct 31;2022:7934868. doi: 10.1155/2022/7934868. eCollection 2022.
2
Optimal Minimal Stent Area and Impact of Stent Underexpansion in Left Main Up-Front 2-Stent Strategy.左主干 upfront 2 支架策略中最优最小支架面积和支架扩张不足的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan;17(1):e013006. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013006. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
3
Single-stent crossover technique from distal unprotected left main coronary artery to the left circumflex artery.经远端无保护左主干至回旋支的单支架交叉技术。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov 1;82(5):757-64. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24988. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
4
The impact of left circumflex coronary artery ostium stenosis on outcomes for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease.左旋支冠状动脉开口狭窄对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无保护左主干病变患者预后的影响。
Kardiol Pol. 2023;81(9):903-908. doi: 10.33963/KP.a2023.0156. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
5
Difference in vascular response between sirolimus-eluting- and everolimus-eluting stents in ostial left circumflex artery after unprotected left main as observed by optical coherence tomography.光学相干断层扫描观察无保护左主干病变后左旋支开口处西罗莫司洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架血管反应的差异
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.122. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
6
Clinical Implications of Bifurcation Angles in Left Main Bifurcation Intervention Using a Two-Stent Technique.左主干分叉病变双支架技术中分叉角度的临床意义。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Jul 11;2020:2475930. doi: 10.1155/2020/2475930. eCollection 2020.
7
Long-Term Outcomes of Different Two-Stent Techniques With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Bifurcation Disease: Insights From the FAILS-2 Study.第二代药物洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干分叉病变不同双支架技术的长期预后:来自FAILS-2研究的见解
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Aug;30(8):276-281.
8
Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架置入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病后,冠状动脉解剖结构和支架技术对长期预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
9
The use of bioresorbable vascular scaffold Absorb BVS® in patients with stable coronary artery disease: one-year results with special focus on the hybrid bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and drug eluting stents treatment.生物可吸收血管支架Absorb BVS®在稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者中的应用:特别关注混合生物可吸收血管支架和药物洗脱支架治疗的一年结果。
Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(7):627-33. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0250. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
10
Long-term outcomes of simple crossover stenting from the left main to the left anterior descending coronary artery.从左主干到左前降支冠状动脉进行简单交叉支架置入术的长期预后。
Korean J Intern Med. 2014 Sep;29(5):597-602. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2014.29.5.597. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioresorbable Scaffold Use in Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: A Long-Term, Single-Center Follow-Up Study.生物可吸收支架在冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变中的应用:一项长期、单中心随访研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 30;60(8):1233. doi: 10.3390/medicina60081233.

本文引用的文献

1
The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN).欧洲分叉俱乐部左主干冠状动脉支架研究:分步临时与系统双支架策略的随机比较(EBC MAIN)。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Oct 1;42(37):3829-3839. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab283.
2
Scaffold underexpansion and late lumen loss after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: Insights from ABSORB JAPAN trial.生物可吸收支架植入后支架扩张不足和晚期管腔丢失:来自ABSORB日本试验的见解。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Sep 4;31:100623. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100623. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Optimal Stenting Technique for Complex Coronary Lesions: Intracoronary Imaging-Guided Pre-Dilation, Stent Sizing, and Post-Dilation.
复杂冠状动脉病变的最佳支架置入技术:冠状动脉内影像学指导的预扩张、支架大小选择和后扩张。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 22;13(12):1403-1413. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.023. Epub 2020 May 27.
4
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄:NOBLE 随机非劣效性试验的 5 年更新结果。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):191-199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
5
The impact of the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and drug-coated balloons in coronary bifurcation lesions.生物可吸收血管支架和药物涂层球囊在冠状动脉分叉病变中的应用影响。
Egypt Heart J. 2019 Dec 16;71(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s43044-019-0033-z.
6
Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease.左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术后 5 年的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 7;381(19):1820-1830. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909406. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
7
3-Year Outcomes of the DKCRUSH-V Trial Comparing DK Crush With Provisional Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions.比较DK Crush与临时支架置入术治疗左主干分叉病变的DKCRUSH-V试验的3年结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 14;12(19):1927-1937. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.056. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
8
Functional and Structural Coronary Recovery at the 5-year Follow-up After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation. An Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis.生物可吸收血管支架植入术后5年随访时的冠状动脉功能和结构恢复。光学相干断层扫描分析
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Apr;72(4):357-359. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
9
Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Distal Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的左主干远端患者的结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e007007. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007007.
10
Long-term outcome of first 300 implanted Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in an all-comers Middle East population.在中东所有人群中首批植入的300个Absorb生物可吸收血管支架的长期结果。
J Int Med Res. 2019 Jan;47(1):173-187. doi: 10.1177/0300060518798994. Epub 2018 Sep 21.