Suppr超能文献

为什么医学需要对“怪物”进行神学思考

Why Medicine Needs a Theology of Monstrosity.

机构信息

Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2022 Nov 21;47(5):612-624. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhac020.

Abstract

For centuries, philosophers and theologians debated the meaning of monstrous births. This article describes the debates that took place in the early modern period concerning the origins of monstrous births and examines how they might be relevant to our understanding of disability today. I begin with the central questions that accompanied the birth of conjoined twins in the early 17th century as well as the theological origins of those questions. I then show the shifts that occurred in philosophical debate in the 18th century, which reveal the changing understanding of God's interaction with creation, as well as the burgeoning medical responses to monstrous births. By reexamining these earlier debates, I claim some of the earlier questions posed by philosophers and theologians have been neglected but remain relevant in bioethics debates concerning how best to consider and treat newborns with certain disabilities.

摘要

几个世纪以来,哲学家和神学家一直在争论畸形儿诞生的意义。本文描述了早期现代时期有关畸形儿诞生起源的争论,并探讨了它们如何与我们今天对残疾的理解相关。我首先介绍了 17 世纪连体双胞胎诞生时伴随的核心问题,以及这些问题的神学起源。然后,我展示了 18 世纪哲学争论中发生的转变,这些转变揭示了人们对上帝与创造相互作用的理解的变化,以及对畸形儿诞生的医疗反应的不断发展。通过重新审视这些早期的争论,我声称哲学家和神学家提出的一些早期问题被忽视了,但在涉及如何最好地考虑和治疗某些残疾新生儿的生物伦理辩论中仍然具有相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验