• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

线上面部女性化手术材料的复杂性超过患者健康素养。

Complexity of Online Facial Feminization Surgery Material Exceeds Patient Health Literacy.

机构信息

School of Medicine Riverside, University of California, Riverside.

Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of Southern California.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(8):e818-e820. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008726. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000008726
PMID:36409856
Abstract

The increase in healthcare coverage for transgender populations has made facial feminization surgeries (FFS) more accessible. Majority of patients interested in surgery regularly check online medical information to help understand surgical procedures, risks, and recovery. National health organizations recommend that patient information material should be written at a sixth-grade-reading level, but online material often surpasses patient health literacy. This study evaluates the readability of online FFS resources. An Internet search of the top 100 Web sites was conducted using the keywords "facial feminization surgery." Web sites were analyzed for relevant patient information articles on FFS and categorized into health care and nonhealth care groups. Readability examinations were performed for written text using the Automated Readability Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog Index, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-tailed z tests, with statistical significance set at P≤0.05. A total of 100 articles from 100 Web sites were examined. The average readability for all online FFS resources was at a 12th-grade-writing level. Articles from health care organizations were at a 13th-grade-reading level and nonhealth care organization articles were at a 12th-grade-reading level (P<0.01). Online patient information for FFS is more complex than nationally recommended writing levels, which may interfere with patient decision making and outcomes. Patient resources for FFS should be written at a lower reading level to promote patient education, satisfaction, and compliance.

摘要

医疗保健覆盖范围的增加使跨性别群体更容易获得面部女性化手术(FFS)。大多数有兴趣接受手术的患者经常在线检查医疗信息,以帮助了解手术程序、风险和恢复情况。国家卫生组织建议,患者信息材料的写作水平应达到六年级阅读水平,但在线材料往往超过患者的健康素养。本研究评估了在线 FFS 资源的可读性。使用关键字“面部女性化手术”对前 100 个网站进行了互联网搜索。对 FFS 的相关患者信息文章进行了分析,并将网站分为医疗保健和非医疗保健组。使用自动可读性指数、Coleman-Liau 指数、Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平、Gunning Fog 指数和简单测量胡言乱语指数对书面文本进行了可读性检查。使用双尾 z 检验进行统计分析,以 P≤0.05 为统计学意义。共检查了 100 个网站的 100 篇文章。所有在线 FFS 资源的平均可读性均为 12 年级写作水平。来自医疗机构的文章为 13 年级阅读水平,而非医疗机构的文章为 12 年级阅读水平(P<0.01)。FFS 的在线患者信息比国家推荐的写作水平更复杂,这可能会干扰患者的决策和结果。FFS 的患者资源应采用较低的阅读水平,以促进患者教育、满意度和依从性。

相似文献

1
Complexity of Online Facial Feminization Surgery Material Exceeds Patient Health Literacy.线上面部女性化手术材料的复杂性超过患者健康素养。
J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(8):e818-e820. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008726. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
2
A multimetric health literacy analysis of online gender affirmation surgery materials: From facial to genital surgery.多维度健康素养分析在线性别肯定手术资料:从面部手术到生殖器手术。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Dec;87:449-460. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.067. Epub 2023 Oct 15.
3
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
4
Hand Surgery Resources Exceed American Health Literacy.手部外科资源超出美国健康素养水平。
Hand (N Y). 2018 Sep;13(5):547-551. doi: 10.1177/1558944717725384. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
5
Assessing Readability of Patient Education Materials on Breast Reconstruction by Major US Academic Hospitals as Compared With Nonacademic Sites.评估美国主要学术医院与非学术网站的乳房再造患者教育材料的可读性。
Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Jun 1;86(6):610-614. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002575.
6
Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.评估三叉神经痛在线患者教育材料的可读性。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e934-e938. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.123. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
7
Readability of Spanish-Language Online Patient Educational Materials for Peripheral Artery Disease Do Not Meet Recommended Standards and Represent a Literacy Barrier to Care.西班牙语在线外周动脉疾病患者教育材料的可读性不符合推荐标准,代表了患者获取医疗服务的读写能力障碍。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Apr;101:157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.10.029. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
8
Quality and Readability of Accessible Facial Feminization Literature: Where Can We Improve?可访问的面部女性化文献的质量和可读性:我们在哪里可以改进?
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6):533-537. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003569.
9
The readability of psychosocial wellness patient resources: improving surgical outcomes.心理社会健康患者资源的可读性:改善手术效果。
J Surg Res. 2017 Oct;218:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.033. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
10
Readability assessment of online patient resources for breast augmentation surgery.隆胸手术在线患者资源的可读性评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1573-1579. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001230.

引用本文的文献

1
Carpal Tunnel Surgery: Can Patients Read, Understand, and Act on Online Educational Resources?腕管综合征手术:患者能否阅读、理解和运用在线教育资源?
Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):47-58.
2
Health literacy of trans and gender diverse individuals -a cross sectional survey in Germany.跨性别和性别多样化个体的健康素养 - 德国的横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 30;24(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17823-4.