Center on Aging Psychology (XL, ZM, XZ, ZZ, JL, JF, QS, JL), CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Department of Psychology (XL, ZM, XZ, ZZ, JL, JF, QS, JL), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention (XH, XW), Beijing, China.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023 Mar;31(3):197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
We sought to assess cognitive benefits of a community-based multidomain intervention for improving cognition among older adults at risk of cognitive decline (COMBAT).
A two-armed cluster-randomized controlled trial.
Community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older and were at risk of cognitive decline (n = 209).
In this 9-month intervention study, 10 community hospitals in Beijing, China, were randomized (1:1) to receive either a multidomain intervention of meditation, cognitive training, exercise, and nutrition counseling or usual care. The intervention was delivered with weekly 1-hour group training sessions and weekly home homework.
Primary outcome was change in cognition as measured by a composite Z score of seven cognitive tests. Secondary outcomes included subjective cognitive abilities, positive and negative affective experiences, physical activity, and dietary habits. Assessments were administered at baseline, end of the intervention, and 1 year after completing the intervention (1-year follow-up).
Immediately after the intervention, the intervention group showed significant enhancement in cognitive performance (p = 0.026). The between-group difference in the Z score of change of cognition was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.053, 0.35), with a Hedges' g of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.29, 0.50). However, this cognitive benefit was not significant at 1-year follow-up.
This multidomain intervention was effective to improve cognition for at-risk individuals. Long-term effects on cognitive function and individual differences in response to the intervention deserve further investigation.
我们旨在评估一项基于社区的多领域干预措施对认知能力下降风险老年人(COMBAT)认知的益处。
一项双臂、聚类随机对照试验。
居住在社区中的年龄在 60 岁或以上、有认知能力下降风险的老年人(n=209)。
在这项为期 9 个月的干预研究中,中国北京的 10 家社区医院被随机(1:1)分为接受多领域干预(冥想、认知训练、运动和营养咨询)或常规护理。干预措施通过每周 1 小时的小组培训课程和每周的家庭作业来实施。
主要结局是通过七个认知测试的综合 Z 分数衡量的认知变化。次要结局包括主观认知能力、积极和消极的情感体验、身体活动和饮食习惯。评估在基线、干预结束时和完成干预后 1 年(1 年随访)进行。
干预后即刻,干预组的认知表现显著提高(p=0.026)。认知变化 Z 分数的组间差异为 0.20(95%CI:0.053,0.35),Hedges'g 为 0.40(95%CI:0.29,0.50)。然而,这种认知益处在 1 年随访时并不显著。
这种多领域干预措施对高危个体的认知有益。需要进一步研究该干预措施对认知功能的长期影响和个体对干预的反应差异。