Suppr超能文献

异食癖、回避性/restrictive食物摄入障碍和反刍障碍访谈ARFID问卷(PARDI-AR-Q)的初步验证。 (注:原文中“ARFID”后面似乎少了个单词,推测可能是“回避性/restrictive食物摄入障碍”相关表述,这里按可能情况翻译了,具体准确内容需结合完整原文判断)

Preliminary validation of the pica, ARFID and rumination disorder interview ARFID questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q).

作者信息

Bryant-Waugh Rachel, Stern Casey M, Dreier Melissa J, Micali Nadia, Cooke Lucy J, Kuhnle Megan C, Burton Murray Helen, Wang Shirley B, Breithaupt Lauren, Becker Kendra R, Misra Madhusmita, Lawson Elizabeth A, Eddy Kamryn T, Thomas Jennifer J

机构信息

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Eat Disord. 2022 Nov 22;10(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s40337-022-00706-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Interview (PARDI) is a structured interview that can be used to determine diagnosis, presenting characteristics, and severity across three disorders, including avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a questionnaire focused specifically on ARFID (PARDI-AR-Q), which has the potential to provide related information with less participant burden.

METHODS

Adolescents and adults (n = 71, ages 14-40 years) with ARFID (n = 42) and healthy control participants (HC, n = 29) completed the PARDI-AR-Q and other measures. A subset of the ARFID group (n = 27) also completed the PARDI interview.

RESULTS

An exploratory factor analysis of proposed subscale items identified three factors corresponding to the ARFID phenotypes of avoidance based on the sensory characteristics of food, lack of interest in eating or food, and concern about aversive consequences of eating. Further analyses supported the internal consistency and convergent validity of the PARDI-AR-Q subscales, and subscale ratings on the questionnaire showed large and significant correlations (all p-values < 0.001; r's ranging from 0.48 to 0.77) with the corresponding subscales on the interview. The ARFID group scored significantly higher than HC on all subscales. Furthermore, 90% of the ARFID group scored positive on the PARDI-AR-Q diagnostic algorithm while 93% of the HC scored negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Though replication in larger and more diverse samples is needed, findings provide early support for the validity of the PARDI-AR-Q as a self-report measure for possible ARFID in clinical or research settings.

摘要

背景

异食癖、回避性/限制性食物摄入障碍及反刍障碍访谈量表(PARDI)是一种结构化访谈工具,可用于确定三种障碍(包括回避性/限制性食物摄入障碍,即ARFID)的诊断、表现特征及严重程度。本研究的目的是评估一份专门针对ARFID的问卷(PARDI-AR-Q)的心理测量特性,该问卷有可能在减轻参与者负担的情况下提供相关信息。

方法

患有ARFID的青少年和成年人(n = 71,年龄14 - 40岁)(n = 42)以及健康对照参与者(HC,n = 29)完成了PARDI-AR-Q及其他测量。ARFID组的一个子集(n = 27)也完成了PARDI访谈。

结果

对提议的子量表项目进行探索性因素分析,确定了三个因素,分别对应基于食物感官特征的回避、对进食或食物缺乏兴趣以及对进食厌恶后果的担忧这三种ARFID表型。进一步分析支持了PARDI-AR-Q子量表的内部一致性和收敛效度,问卷上的子量表评分与访谈中的相应子量表显示出高度显著的相关性(所有p值<0.001;r值范围为0.48至0.77)。ARFID组在所有子量表上的得分均显著高于HC组。此外,90%的ARFID组在PARDI-AR-Q诊断算法上得分呈阳性,而93%的HC组得分呈阴性。

结论

尽管需要在更大且更多样化的样本中进行重复验证,但研究结果为PARDI-AR-Q作为临床或研究环境中可能的ARFID的自我报告测量工具的有效性提供了早期支持。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验