Department of Medical Microbiology and Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Microbiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 3;76(7):1188-1196. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac913.
An increase in infections after transrectal prostate biopsy (PB), related to an increasing number of patients with ciprofloxacin-resistant rectal flora, necessitates the exploration of alternatives for the traditionally used empirical prophylaxis of ciprofloxacin. We compared infectious complication rates after transrectal PB using empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis versus culture-based prophylaxis.
In this nonblinded, randomized trial, between 4 April 2018 and 30 July 2021, we enrolled 1538 patients from 11 Dutch hospitals undergoing transrectal PB. After rectal swab collection, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive empirical prophylaxis with oral ciprofloxacin (control group [CG]) or culture-based prophylaxis (intervention group [IG]). Primary outcome was any infectious complication within 7 days after biopsy. Secondary outcomes were infectious complications within 30 days, and bacteremia and bacteriuria within 7 and 30 days postbiopsy. For primary outcome analysis, the χ2 test stratified for hospitals was used. Trial registration number: NCT03228108.
Data from 1288 patients (83.7%) were available for analysis (CG, 652; IG, 636). Infection rates within 7 days postbiopsy were 4.3% (n = 28) (CG) and 2.5% (n = 16) (IG) (P value = .08; reduction: -1.8%; 95% confidence interval, -.004 to .040). Ciprofloxacin-resistant bacteria were detected in 15.2% (n = 1288). In the CG, the presence of ciprofloxacin-resistant rectal flora resulted in a 6.2-fold higher risk of early postbiopsy infection.
Our study supports the use of culture-based prophylaxis to reduce infectious complications after transrectal PB. Despite adequate prophylaxis, postbiopsy infections can still occur. Therefore, culture-based prophylaxis must be weighed against other strategies that could reduce postbiopsy infections. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03228108.
由于越来越多的直肠菌群对环丙沙星耐药,经直肠前列腺活检(PB)后感染的发生率增加,因此需要探索替代传统经验性环丙沙星预防的方法。我们比较了经直肠 PB 后使用经验性环丙沙星预防与基于培养的预防的感染并发症发生率。
在这项非盲、随机试验中,我们纳入了 2018 年 4 月 4 日至 2021 年 7 月 30 日期间来自荷兰 11 家医院的 1538 名接受经直肠 PB 的患者。在直肠拭子采集后,患者按 1:1 随机接受口服环丙沙星的经验性预防(对照组[CG])或基于培养的预防(干预组[IG])。主要结局是活检后 7 天内任何感染性并发症。次要结局是 30 天内的感染性并发症,以及活检后 7 天和 30 天内的菌血症和菌尿。对于主要结局分析,使用按医院分层的 χ2 检验。试验注册编号:NCT03228108。
1288 名患者(83.7%)的数据可用于分析(CG,652 例;IG,636 例)。活检后 7 天内的感染率为 4.3%(n=28)(CG)和 2.5%(n=16)(IG)(P 值=0.08;降低:-1.8%;95%置信区间,-.004 至.040)。在 1288 名患者中,检测到 15.2%(n=1288)的环丙沙星耐药细菌。在 CG 中,存在环丙沙星耐药的直肠菌群会使活检后早期感染的风险增加 6.2 倍。
我们的研究支持使用基于培养的预防来降低经直肠 PB 后的感染并发症。尽管进行了适当的预防,但仍可能发生活检后感染。因此,基于培养的预防必须与其他可能降低活检后感染的策略进行权衡。临床试验注册。NCT03228108。