Tops Sofie C M, Kolwijck Eva, Koldewijn Evert L, Somford Diederik M, Delaere Filip J M, van Leeuwen Menno A, Breeuwsma Anthonius J, de Vocht Thijn F, Broos Hans J H P, Schipper Rob A, Steffens Martijn G, Wegdam-Blans Marjolijn C A, de Brauwer Els, van den Bijllaardt Wouter, Leenders Alexander C A P, Sedelaar J P Michiel, Wertheim Heiman F L, Adang Eddy
Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Feb 26;50:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.006. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Culture-based antibiotic prophylaxis is a plausible strategy to reduce infections after transrectal prostate biopsy (PB) related to fluoroquinolone-resistant pathogens.
To assess the cost effectiveness of rectal culture-based prophylaxis compared with empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis.
The study was performed alongside a trial in 11 Dutch hospitals investigating the effectiveness of culture-based prophylaxis in transrectal PB between April 2018 and July 2021 (trial registration number: NCT03228108).
Patients were 1:1 randomized for empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (oral) or culture-based prophylaxis. Costs for both prophylactic strategies were determined for two scenarios: (1) all infectious complications within 7 d after biopsy and (2) culture-proven Gram-negative infections within 30 d after biopsy.
Differences in costs and effects (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) were analyzed from a healthcare and societal perspective (including productivity losses, and travel and parking costs) using a bootstrap procedure presenting uncertainty surrounding the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in a cost-effectiveness plane and acceptability curve.
For the 7-d follow-up period, culture-based prophylaxis ( = 636) was €51.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.52-96.63) more expensive from a healthcare perspective and €16.95 (95% CI -54.29 to 88.18) from a societal perspective than empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis ( = 652). Ciprofloxacin-resistant bacteria were detected in 15.4%. Extrapolating our data, from a healthcare perspective, 40% ciprofloxacin resistance would lead to equal cost for both strategies. Results were similar for the 30-d follow-up period. No significant differences in QALYs were observed.
Our results should be interpreted in the context of local ciprofloxacin resistance rates. In our setting, from a healthcare perspective, culture-based prophylaxis was significantly more expensive than empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. From a societal perspective, culture-based prophylaxis was somewhat more cost effective against the threshold value customary for the Netherlands (€80.000).
Culture-based prophylaxis in transrectal prostate biopsy was not associated with reduced costs compared with empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis.
基于培养结果的抗生素预防是一种合理的策略,可减少经直肠前列腺穿刺活检(PB)后与耐氟喹诺酮病原体相关的感染。
评估与经验性环丙沙星预防相比,基于直肠培养结果的预防措施的成本效益。
设计、设置和参与者:该研究是在11家荷兰医院进行的一项试验的同时开展的,该试验于2018年4月至2021年7月期间调查基于培养结果的预防措施在经直肠PB中的有效性(试验注册号:NCT03228108)。
患者按1:1随机分配接受经验性环丙沙星预防(口服)或基于培养结果的预防措施。两种预防策略的成本在两种情况下进行了确定:(1)活检后7天内的所有感染并发症,以及(2)活检后30天内培养证实的革兰氏阴性菌感染。
从医疗保健和社会角度(包括生产力损失、交通和停车成本)分析成本和效果(质量调整生命年[QALY])的差异,使用自举程序在成本效益平面和可接受性曲线中呈现增量成本效益比周围的不确定性。
在7天的随访期内,从医疗保健角度来看,基于培养结果的预防措施(n = 636)比经验性环丙沙星预防措施(n = 652)贵51.57欧元(95%置信区间[CI] 6.52 - 96.63),从社会角度来看贵16.95欧元(95% CI -54.29至88.18)。检测到15.4%的耐环丙沙星细菌。根据我们的数据推断,从医疗保健角度来看,40%的环丙沙星耐药率将导致两种策略的成本相等。30天随访期的结果相似。未观察到QALY有显著差异。
我们的结果应结合当地环丙沙星耐药率来解释。在我们的研究环境中,从医疗保健角度来看,基于培养结果的预防措施比经验性环丙沙星预防措施贵得多。从社会角度来看,基于培养结果的预防措施相对于荷兰惯用的阈值(80000欧元)在成本效益方面略好一些。
与经验性环丙沙星预防相比,经直肠前列腺穿刺活检中基于培养结果的预防措施并未降低成本。