Department of Internal Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Apr;10(2):762-775. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14233. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
Right ventricular (RV) function and its adaptation to increased afterload [RV-pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling] are crucial in various types of pulmonary hypertension, determining symptomatology and outcome. In the course of disease progression and increasing afterload, the right ventricle undergoes adaptive remodelling to maintain right-sided cardiac output by increasing contractility. Exhaustion of compensatory RV remodelling (RV-PA uncoupling) finally leads to maladaptation and increase of cardiac volumes, resulting in heart failure. The gold-standard measurement of RV-PA coupling is the ratio of contractility [end-systolic elastance (Ees)] to afterload [arterial elastance (Ea)] derived from RV pressure-volume loops obtained by conductance catheterization. The optimal Ees/Ea ratio is between 1.5 and 2.0. RV-PA coupling in pulmonary hypertension has considerable reserve; the Ees/Ea threshold at which uncoupling occurs is estimated to be ~0.7. As RV conductance catheterization is invasive, complex, and not widely available, multiple non-invasive echocardiographic surrogates for Ees/Ea have been investigated. One of the first described and best validated surrogates is the ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to estimated pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP), which has shown prognostic relevance in left-sided heart failure and precapillary pulmonary hypertension. Other RV-PA coupling surrogates have been formed by replacing TAPSE with different echocardiographic measures of RV contractility, such as peak systolic tissue velocity of the lateral tricuspid annulus (S'), RV fractional area change, speckle tracking-based RV free wall longitudinal strain and global longitudinal strain, and three-dimensional RV ejection fraction. PASP-independent surrogates have also been studied, including the ratios S'/RV end-systolic area index, RV area change/RV end-systolic area, and stroke volume/end-systolic volume. Limitations of these non-invasive surrogates include the influence of severe tricuspid regurgitation (which can cause distortion of longitudinal measurements and underestimation of PASP) and the angle dependence of TAPSE and PASP. Detection of early RV remodelling may require isolated analysis of single components of RV shortening along the radial and anteroposterior axes as well as the longitudinal axis. Multiple non-invasive methods may need to be applied depending on the level of RV dysfunction. This review explains the mechanisms of RV (mal)adaptation to its load, describes the invasive assessment of RV-PA coupling, and provides an overview of studies of non-invasive surrogate parameters, highlighting recently published works in this field. Further large-scale prospective studies including gold-standard validation are needed, as most studies to date had a retrospective, single-centre design with a small number of participants, and validation against gold-standard Ees/Ea was rarely performed.
右心室(RV)功能及其对后负荷增加的适应性[RV-肺动脉(PA)偶联]在各种类型的肺动脉高压中至关重要,决定了症状和预后。在疾病进展和后负荷增加的过程中,右心室通过增加收缩力来进行适应性重塑,以维持右侧心输出量。RV 重塑的代偿性耗尽(RV-PA 解偶联)最终导致心脏容积的失调和增加,导致心力衰竭。RV-PA 偶联的金标准测量是由右心室压力-容积环得出的收缩力[收缩末期弹性(Ees)]与后负荷[动脉弹性(Ea)]的比值,该环通过心导管获得。最佳的 Ees/Ea 比值在 1.5 到 2.0 之间。肺动脉高压中的 RV-PA 偶联具有相当大的储备;解偶联时的 Ees/Ea 阈值估计约为 0.7。由于 RV 心导管术具有侵入性、复杂性且不广泛可用,因此已经研究了多种非侵入性超声心动图替代 Ees/Ea 的方法。第一个描述和验证最好的替代方法之一是三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移与估计的肺动脉收缩压(TAPSE/PASP)的比值,该比值在左侧心力衰竭和毛细血管前肺动脉高压中具有预后相关性。其他 RV-PA 偶联替代方法是用不同的 RV 收缩力超声心动图测量值代替 TAPSE,例如外侧三尖瓣环的收缩期组织速度峰值(S')、RV 局部面积变化、斑点追踪法 RV 游离壁纵向应变和整体纵向应变以及三维 RV 射血分数。也研究了与 PASP 无关的替代方法,包括 S'/RV 收缩末期面积指数、RV 面积变化/RV 收缩末期面积和每搏量/收缩末期容积比值。这些非侵入性替代方法的局限性包括严重三尖瓣反流的影响(可导致纵向测量值失真并低估 PASP)和 TAPSE 和 PASP 的角度依赖性。检测 RV 早期重塑可能需要单独分析 RV 缩短沿径向和前后轴以及纵向的单个成分。可能需要应用多种非侵入性方法,具体取决于 RV 功能障碍的程度。本综述解释了 RV(不良)适应其负荷的机制,描述了 RV-PA 偶联的侵入性评估,并提供了非侵入性替代参数研究的概述,重点介绍了该领域最近发表的工作。需要进一步进行大型前瞻性研究,包括金标准验证,因为迄今为止的大多数研究都是回顾性的、单中心设计,参与者数量较少,并且很少对金标准的 Ees/Ea 进行验证。