Suppr超能文献

基于心脏磁共振成像的右心室应变分析评估肺动脉高压的耦联和舒张功能。

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Right Ventricular Strain Analysis for Assessment of Coupling and Diastolic Function in Pulmonary Hypertension.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center, Giessen, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Nov;12(11 Pt 1):2155-2164. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.032. Epub 2019 Mar 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging-derived right ventricular (RV) strain and invasively measured pressure-volume loop-derived RV contractility, stiffness, and afterload and RV-arterial coupling in pulmonary hypertension (PH).

BACKGROUND

In chronic RV pressure overload, RV-arterial uncoupling is considered the driving cause of RV maladaptation and eventual RV failure. The pathophysiological and clinical value of CMR-derived RV strain relative to that of invasive pressure-volume loop-derived measurements in PH remains incompletely understood.

METHODS

In 38 patients with PH, global RV CMR strain was measured within 24 h of diagnostic right heart catheterization and conductance (pressure-volume) catheterization. Associations were evaluated by correlation, multivariate logistic binary regression, and receiver operating characteristic analyses.

RESULTS

Long-axis RV longitudinal and radial strain and short-axis RV radial and circumferential strain were -18.0 ± 7.0%, 28.9% [interquartile range (IQR): 17.4% to 46.6%]; 15.6 ± 6.2%; and -9.8 ± 3.5%, respectively. RV-arterial coupling (end-systolic [Eds]/arterial elastance [Ea]) was 0.76 (IQR: 0.47 to 1.07). Peak RV strain correlated with Ees/Ea, afterload (Ea), RV diastolic dysfunction (Tau), and stiffness (end-diastolic elastance [Eed]) but not with contractility (Ees). In multivariate analysis, long-axis RV radial strain was associated with RV-arterial uncoupling (Ees/Ea: <0.805; odds ratio [OR]: 5.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.50 to 20.18), whereas long-axis RV longitudinal strain was associated with increased RV diastolic stiffness (Eed: ≥0.124 mm Hg/ml; OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.51). The long-axis RV longitudinal strain-to-RV end-diastolic volume/body surface area ratio strongly predicted RV diastolic stiffness (area under receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.908).

CONCLUSIONS

In chronic RV overload, CMR-determined RV strain is associated with RV-arterial uncoupling and RV end-diastolic stiffness and represents a promising noninvasive alternative to current invasive methods for assessment of RV-arterial coupling and end-diastolic stiffness in patients with PH. (Right Ventricular Haemodynamic Evaluation and Response to Treatment [Rightheart I]; NCT03403868).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较心脏磁共振(CMR)成像衍生的右心室(RV)应变与侵入性测量的压力-容积环衍生的 RV 收缩力、僵硬和后负荷以及肺动脉高压(PH)中的 RV-动脉偶联。

背景

在慢性 RV 压力超负荷中,RV-动脉解偶联被认为是 RV 适应不良和最终 RV 衰竭的驱动因素。CMR 衍生的 RV 应变与 PH 中的侵入性压力-容积环衍生测量相比,其在病理生理和临床方面的价值仍不完全清楚。

方法

在 38 例 PH 患者中,在诊断性右心导管检查和电导(压力-容积)导管检查后 24 小时内测量了全局 RV CMR 应变。通过相关性、多变量逻辑二元回归和接收器操作特征分析评估关联。

结果

RV 长轴纵向和径向应变以及 RV 短轴径向和周向应变分别为-18.0±7.0%,28.9%(四分位距[IQR]:17.4%至 46.6%);15.6±6.2%;-9.8±3.5%。RV-动脉偶联(收缩末期[Eds]/动脉弹性[Ea])为 0.76(IQR:0.47 至 1.07)。峰值 RV 应变与 Ees/Ea、后负荷(Ea)、RV 舒张功能障碍(Tau)和僵硬(舒张末期弹性[Eed])相关,但与收缩力(Ees)无关。在多变量分析中,RV 长轴径向应变与 RV-动脉解偶联相关(Ees/Ea:<0.805;比值比[OR]:5.50;95%置信区间[CI]:1.50 至 20.18),而 RV 长轴纵向应变与 RV 舒张僵硬相关(Eed:≥0.124 mm Hg/ml;OR:1.23;95%CI:1.10 至 1.51)。RV 长轴纵向应变与 RV 舒张末期容积/体表面积比值强烈预测 RV 舒张僵硬(接收器操作特征曲线下面积:0.908)。

结论

在慢性 RV 超负荷中,CMR 确定的 RV 应变与 RV-动脉解偶联和 RV 舒张末期僵硬相关,是一种很有前途的非侵入性替代方法,可用于评估 PH 患者的 RV-动脉偶联和舒张末期僵硬,优于目前的侵入性方法。(右心室血液动力学评估和治疗反应[Rightheart I];NCT03403868)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验