Suppr超能文献

比较急诊科中因胸痛和焦虑接受评估的患者现有焦虑治疗方案的有效性:PACER实用随机对照有效性试验的研究方案。

Comparing the effectiveness of existing anxiety treatment options among patients evaluated for chest pain and anxiety in the emergency department setting: Study protocol for the PACER pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial.

作者信息

Connors Jill Nault, Kroenke Kurt, Monahan Patrick, Chernyak Yelena, Pettit Kate, Hayden Julie, Montgomery Chet, Brenner George, Millard Michael, Holmes Emily, Musey Paul

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, United States.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Jan;124:107020. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107020. Epub 2022 Nov 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anxiety disorders are a common underlying cause of symptoms among low-risk chest pain patients evaluated in the emergency department setting. However, anxiety is often undiagnosed and undertreated in any setting, and causes considerable functional impairment to work, family, and social life.

OBJECTIVES

The Patient-Centered Treatment of Anxiety after Low-Risk Chest Pain in the Emergency Room (PACER) study is a pragmatic randomized trial to test the comparative effectiveness of existing anxiety treatments of graduated intensities and determine what options work best for patient subgroups based on anxiety severity and other comorbidities.

METHODS

The PACER trial will enroll 375 emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain and anxiety (GAD-7 score ≥ 8) and randomize them to either: 1) referral to primary care with enhanced care coordination, 2) online self-administered cognitive behavioral therapy with guided peer support, or 3) therapist-administered cognitive behavior therapy. Outcomes include anxiety symptoms (primary) as well as physical symptom burden, depression symptoms, functional impairment, ED recidivism, and occurrence of major adverse cardiac events. Statistical analyses will be conducted primarily using linear mixed models to perform a repeated measures analysis of patient-reported outcomes, assessed at 3, 6, 9, and 12-month follow-ups.

DISCUSSION

PACER is an innovative and pragmatic clinical trial that will compare the effectiveness of several evidence-based telecare-delivered treatments for anxiety. Results have the potential to inform clinical guidelines for evaluation and management of low-risk chest pain patients and promote adoption of findings in ED departments across the country.

摘要

背景

焦虑症是在急诊科接受评估的低风险胸痛患者症状的常见潜在原因。然而,在任何环境中,焦虑症往往未被诊断和治疗不足,并对工作、家庭和社会生活造成相当大的功能损害。

目的

急诊科低风险胸痛后焦虑症的以患者为中心治疗(PACER)研究是一项实用的随机试验,旨在测试现有不同强度焦虑症治疗方法的相对有效性,并根据焦虑严重程度和其他合并症确定哪些治疗方法对患者亚组最有效。

方法

PACER试验将招募375名患有低风险胸痛和焦虑症(广泛性焦虑障碍7项量表评分≥8)的急诊科患者,并将他们随机分为:1)转介至初级保健并加强护理协调,2)在线自我管理的认知行为疗法并获得同伴指导支持,或3)治疗师实施的认知行为疗法。结果包括焦虑症状(主要指标)以及身体症状负担、抑郁症状、功能损害、急诊科再就诊率和主要不良心脏事件的发生情况。统计分析将主要使用线性混合模型对患者报告的结果进行重复测量分析,在3、6、9和12个月的随访中进行评估。

讨论

PACER是一项创新且实用的临床试验,将比较几种基于证据的远程护理提供的焦虑症治疗方法的有效性。研究结果有可能为低风险胸痛患者的评估和管理临床指南提供信息,并促进全国急诊科采用这些研究结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验