European Forest Institute, Bonn Office, Governance Programme, Platz der Vereinten Nationen 7, 53113, Bonn, Germany; Wageningen University and Research, Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands.
European Forest Institute, Bonn Office, Governance Programme, Platz der Vereinten Nationen 7, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 15;326(Pt B):116808. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116808. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
Investment products labelled as sustainable, as well as regulations on sustainable finance, such as the EU taxonomy for sustainable activities, are on the rise globally. While some of these products and regulations include forests and forestry, the forest-sustainable finance nexus is largely unexplored in academic research. This paper systematically analyses the emerging expert debate spanning across the financial and forest sectors. We conducted 51 in-depth qualitative interviews with experts from financial institutions, timberland and impact investors, international organizations, civil society organizations and academia. We chose mainly experts from Europe, as one of the regions spearheading the topic globally. Based on these, we identify five main narratives on the nexus between sustainable finance and forests. These narratives are strikingly different regarding such dimensions as emphasis on risks versus opportunities, preference for public versus private governance and investments, as well as on the sustainability of forest-related investments per se. While financial sector experts are mainly concerned about financial risks, and only partially about deforestation risks, forest sector experts with financial expertise promote investment opportunities either for the asset class, or to increase private investment in tropical forests. In contrast, some experts from both the forest and financial sectors explicitly exclude forests as investable assets for the private sector, seeing them instead as pure public goods. We conclude with underlining the importance of more cross-sectoral dialogue, but also research, to both critically assess and advance the role of sustainable finance policy and practice in supporting forest conservation, restoration, and sustainable management.
投资产品贴上可持续标签,以及可持续金融法规(如欧盟可持续活动分类法)在全球范围内不断增加。虽然这些产品和法规中有一些包含森林和林业,但森林可持续金融的联系在学术研究中基本上没有得到探索。本文系统地分析了金融和林业部门之间新兴的专家辩论。我们对来自金融机构、林地和影响力投资者、国际组织、民间社会组织和学术界的专家进行了 51 次深入的定性访谈。我们主要选择了来自欧洲的专家,因为欧洲是全球推动该主题的地区之一。基于这些,我们确定了可持续金融与森林之间联系的五个主要叙述。这些叙述在强调风险与机会、偏好公共治理与投资、以及森林相关投资本身的可持续性等方面存在显著差异。虽然金融部门的专家主要关注金融风险,而只是部分关注森林砍伐风险,但具有金融专业知识的林业部门专家则为资产类别或增加对热带森林的私人投资来促进投资机会。相比之下,来自林业和金融部门的一些专家明确将森林排除在私人部门的可投资资产之外,将其视为纯粹的公共产品。我们的结论是,需要更多的跨部门对话,但也需要研究,以批判性地评估和推进可持续金融政策和实践在支持森林保护、恢复和可持续管理方面的作用。