aUniversity of Alabama, USA.
bMaastricht University, Netherlands.
Adv Health Care Manag. 2022 Dec 12;21. doi: 10.1108/S1474-823120220000021006.
Networked forms of organizing in health care are increasingly viewed as an effective means of addressing "wicked", multifaceted health and societal challenges. This is because networks attempt to address these challenges via collaborative approaches in which diverse stakeholders together define the problem(s) and implement solutions. Consequently, there has been a sharp increase in the number and types of networks used in health care. Despite this growth, our understanding of how these networks are governed has not kept pace. The purpose of this chapter is to chart a research agenda for scholars who are interested in studying health care network governance (i.e., the systems of rules and decision-making within networks), which is of particular importance in deliberate networks between organizations. We do so based on our knowledge of the literature and interviews with subject matter experts, both of which are used to identify core network governance concepts that represent gaps in our current knowledge. Our analysis identified various conceptualizations of networks and of their governance, as well as four primary knowledge gaps: "bread and butter" studies of network governance in health care, the role of single organizations in managing health care networks, governance through the life-cycle stages of health care networks, and governing across the multiple levels of health care networks. We first seek to provide some conceptual clarity around networks and network governance. Subsequently, we describe some of the challenges that researchers may confront while addressing the associated knowledge gaps and potential ways to overcome these challenges.
医疗保健中的网络组织形式越来越被视为解决“棘手”、多方面的健康和社会挑战的有效手段。这是因为网络试图通过合作的方式来应对这些挑战,在这种方式中,不同的利益相关者共同定义问题并实施解决方案。因此,医疗保健中使用的网络的数量和类型急剧增加。尽管如此,我们对这些网络如何被治理的理解并没有跟上。本章的目的是为有兴趣研究医疗保健网络治理(即网络内的规则和决策系统)的学者制定研究议程,这在组织之间的精心设计的网络中尤为重要。我们这样做是基于我们对文献的了解和对主题专家的访谈,这两者都用于确定代表我们当前知识空白的核心网络治理概念。我们的分析确定了网络及其治理的各种概念化,以及四个主要的知识差距:医疗保健网络治理的“基础”研究、单个组织在管理医疗保健网络方面的作用、通过医疗保健网络的生命周期阶段进行治理,以及在医疗保健网络的多个层次上进行治理。我们首先试图在网络和网络治理方面提供一些概念上的清晰性。随后,我们描述了研究人员在解决相关知识差距时可能面临的一些挑战,以及克服这些挑战的潜在方法。